Abstract
A self-limited regime consists in a set of agreements with some governing principles and rules that do not exclude out of hand other rules of public international law. The World Trade Organization (WTO) panels and Appellate Body have insistently demonstrated the openness of the WTO to public international law. However, this openness is limited and by no means governs the WTO’s specific nature. WTO cannot work efficaciously as a closed regime, but the pursuit of further agreements to be applied is limited by a bias toward trade that runs through decisions of the WTO Dispute Settlement System. Of course, the interpretation of Article XX of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) is a sort of “filter” by which outside treaties are invoked but tensions with WTO logic are not acknowledged. As a result, consolidating suitable safeguards for plant, animal, and human life and natural resources becomes almost impossible within the WTO.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Commentary to Article 55 (lex specialis) of the European Commission’s (EC) draft articles on responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts.
- 2.
Case concerning the US Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran (US v.Iran) “Hostages case,” ICJ Reports 1980, p. 41.
- 3.
Koskenniemi (2006), para. 110.
- 4.
Op. cit., para. 111.
- 5.
WTO DS 290.
- 6.
EC-Trademarks, Panel Report, para. 7.210.
- 7.
In the first place, an interpreter inquires whether the measure figures among exceptions stipulated in Article XX; he then examines if it is necessary to meet the goal previously listed and, finally, verifies the fulfillment of the chapeau requirements, namely, the lack of arbitrary or unjustified discrimination amidst countries where the same conditions prevail or imposition of disguised restrictions to international trade.
- 8.
This approach was first taken in a case called US-Tuna-Dolphin II.
- 9.
WTO DS 371.
- 10.
WTO DS 186.
- 11.
GATT Panel Report, Thailand—Cigarettes, para. 75.
- 12.
Paltrowitz (2001).
- 13.
WTO DS 332.
- 14.
WTO DS 246.
- 15.
WTO DS 135.
- 16.
WTO DS 276.
- 17.
WTO DS 161.
- 18.
WTO DS 58.
- 19.
WTO DS 246.
- 20.
Schoenbaum (1997).
- 21.
US—Poultry (China), Panel Report, para. 7.481.
- 22.
WTO DS 406.
- 23.
WTO DS 431.
- 24.
do Amaral Júnior et al. (2009), p. 209.
- 25.
Condon (2002).
- 26.
WTO DS 2.
- 27.
US—Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products, AB Report, paras. 127–131.
- 28.
Schoenbaum (1997).
- 29.
China—Auto Parts, Panel Report, paras. 7.293–7.296.
- 30.
Mexico—Taxes on Soft Drinks, AB Report, para. 69.
- 31.
EC—Trademarks and Geographical Indications (US), Panel Report, para. 7.462.
- 32.
Colombia—Ports of Entry, Panel Report, paras. 7.482–7.620.
- 33.
US—Gambling, Panel Report, para. 6.465; US—Gambling, AB Report, para. 299.
- 34.
US—Gambling, Panel Report, para. 6.461.
- 35.
China—Publications and Audiovisual Products, Panel Report, para. 7.759.
- 36.
China—Publications and Audiovisual Products, Panel Report, paras. 7.751–7.793.
- 37.
China—Publications and Audiovisual Products, Panel Report, para. 7.817.
- 38.
China—Publications and Audiovisual Products, Panel Report, para. 7.819.
- 39.
China—Publications and Audiovisual Products, AB Report, paras. 243–249.
- 40.
US–Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products, AB Report, para. 161.
- 41.
Gaines (2001).
- 42.
In do Amaral Júnior (2010).
- 43.
WTO DS 401.
- 44.
Korea—Measures Affecting Government Procurement, Panel Report, para. 7.96.
References
Condon B (2002) Multilateral environmental agreements and the WTO: is the sky really falling. Tulsa J Comp Int Law 9(2):547
do Amaral Júnior A (2010) Comércio Internacional e a Proteção do Meio Ambiente. Atlas, São Paulo
do Amaral Júnior A et al (2009) O Artigo XX do GATT, meio ambiente e direitos humanos. São Paulo, Aduaneiras
Gaines S (2001) The WTO’s reading of the GATT Article XX chapeau: a disguised restriction on environmental measures. J Int Econ Law 22(4):778. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=301404. Accessed on 16 Feb 2018
Koskenniemi M (13 April 2006) Fragmentation of international law: difficulties arising from the diversification and expansion of international law. United Nations Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission (ILC). A/CN.4/L.682
Paltrowitz JH (2001) A “greening” of the World Trade Organization? A case comment on the Asbestos report. Brooklyn J Int Law 26(4):1789–1838
Schoenbaum TJ (1997) International trade and protection of the environment: the continuing search for reconciliation. Am J Int Law 91(2):268–313. https://doi.org/10.2307/2954212. Published by: Cambridge University Press
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Amaral Júnior, A.d., Kramer, C. (2019). WTO as a Self-Limited Regime: The Case of Article XX of GATT. In: do Amaral Júnior, A., de Oliveira Sá Pires, L.M., Lucena Carneiro, C. (eds) The WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03263-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03263-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03262-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03263-0
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)