Skip to main content

Making Bitcoin Legal

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Security Protocols XXVI (Security Protocols 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 11286))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

What would happen if the existing laws were actually enforced on the rich and powerful? Social reformers often clamour for new rules but ignore the huge changes that might happen if our existing rules were applied equally to all. And in the brave new world of ICOs and thousand percent cryptocurrency inflation, the rich and powerful are the bitcoin exchanges. What would happen if FinCEN regulations and the laws against money laundering were applied to them, and extended by sensible case law? We argue that this could mitigate most of the worst excesses of cryptocurrency world, and turn a dangerous system into a much safer one. The curious thing about this change is that it would not involve changing the protocol. It would not even necessarily involve changing the law. It might be enough to take some information that’s already public, publishing it again in a more easily understood format.

When you come to a fork in the road, take it – Yogi Berra

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Slightly over 72% of all bitcoin accounts with a nonzero balance are taint-free.

  2. 2.

    Monetary law over the centuries has had the same ambivalent attitude about whether money consists of the physical goods that used to embody it, such as coins or notes, or the value they embody – just as bitcoin promoters claim that cryptocurrencies are money or goods depending on which will best help them escape regulation.

  3. 3.

    The maintenance of the taintchain could and should be open, which in itself gives rise to interesting questions of governance, which will lead to protocol design questions too.

References

  1. Bonneau, J., Clark, J., Narayanan, A., Kroll, J., Felten, E.: Sok: research perspectives and challenges for Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. In: IEEE S&P 2015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng, E.: US government misses out on \$600 million payday by selling dirty Bitcoins too early. CNBC, 3 October 2017

    Google Scholar 

  3. Devaynes v Noble. 35 ER 767, 781 (1816)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network: Application of FinCEN’s Regulations to Persons Administering, Exchanging, or Using Virtual Currencies (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fox, D.: Property Rights in Money. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fox, D.: Cyber-Currencies in Private Law. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hardy, P.: Failure to register with FINCEN sustains guilty please by virtual currency exchangers. Money Laundering Watch, 24 April 2017

    Google Scholar 

  8. Higgins, S.: US Marshals Service to Auction Off \$54 Million in Bitcoin. Coindesk, 11 January 2018

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hudak, S.: FinCEN Fines BTC-e Virtual Currency Exchange \$110 Million for Facilitating Ransomware, Dark Net Drug Sales (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kim, C., Yang, H.: Uproar over crackdown on cryptocurrencies divides South Korea. Reuters, 12 January 2018

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, T.: A brief history of Bitcoin hacks and frauds. Ars Technica, 12 May 2017

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meiklejohn, S., et al.: A fistful of Bitcoins: characterising payments among men with no names. In: IMC 2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Möser, M., Böhme, R., Breuker, D.: Towards Risk Scoring of Bitcoin Transactions. Financial Cryptography (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Möser, M., Böhme, R., Breuker, D.: An inquiry into money laundering tools in the Bitcoin ecosystem. In: IEEE, eCrime (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., Goldfeder, S.: Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technologies. Princeton University, Princeton (2016)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Popper, N.: Bitcoin Thieves Threaten Real Violence for Virtual Currencies. New York Times, 18 February 2018

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge helpful discussions with David Fox, Shehar Bano, Tyler Moore, Nicolas Christin, Rainer Böhme, Johann Bezuidenhoudt, Lawrence Esswood, Joe Bonneau and various attendees at Financial Cryptography 2018 where we presented some of the ideas here at a rump session talk.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ross Anderson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Anderson, R., Shumailov, I., Ahmed, M. (2018). Making Bitcoin Legal. In: MatyĂ¡Å¡, V., Å venda, P., Stajano, F., Christianson, B., Anderson, J. (eds) Security Protocols XXVI. Security Protocols 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11286. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03251-7_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03251-7_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03250-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03251-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics