Skip to main content

Robust Energy Procurement Under Time-of-Use Pricing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robust Energy Procurement of Large Electricity Consumers
  • 252 Accesses

Abstract

The time-of-use (TOU) pricing is one of the most important demand response programs in an electricity market, which is used to manage the peak load demand. In this way, capital investment of extra power plants, which may be required few hours during a year, is eliminated. In the TOU demand response program, a constant set of tariffs for different hours of the day and/or seasons is defined at the beginning of a given horizon.

In this chapter, the TOU demand response program is considered to implement the power procurement problem of a large consumer in the presence of pool price uncertainty. The uncertainty of power price in the pool market is modeled using the robust optimization method in which the sensitivity of the optimal solution to the power price uncertainty is reduced. The application of the TOU is reported and analyzed through numerical studies. In addition, obtained results are compared with the deterministic case and without implementing TOU demand response programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Y. Wang, L. Li, Time-of-use electricity pricing for industrial customers: a survey of U.S. utilities. Appl. Energy 149, 89–103 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. N. Ghadimi, Two new methods for power flow tracing using bus power balance equations. J. Cent. South Univ. 21(7), 2712–2718 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. U.S. Energy Information Administration, Smart Grid Legislative and Regulatory Policies and Case Studies (Author, Washington, DC, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Hosseini Firouz, N. Ghadimi, Optimal preventive maintenance policy for electric power distribution systems based on the fuzzy AHP methods. Complexity 21(6), 70–88 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. M.P. Lee, Assessment of Demand Response & Advanced Metering, Staff Report (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. H.A. Aalami, M.P. Moghaddam, G.R. Yousefi, Modeling and prioritizing demand response programs in power markets. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 80(4), 426–435 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Nojavan, H. allah Aalami, Stochastic energy procurement of large electricity consumer considering photovoltaic, wind-turbine, micro-turbines, energy storage system in the presence of demand response program. Energy Convers. Manag. 103, 1008–1018 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Nojavan, H. Ghesmati, K. Zare, Robust optimal offering strategy of large consumer using IGDT considering demand response programs. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 130, 46–58 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Nojavan, K. Zare, B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Robust bidding and offering strategies of electricity retailer under multi-tariff pricing. Energy Econ. 68, 359–372 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Nojavan, K. Zare, B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Selling price determination by electricity retailer in the smart grid under demand side management in the presence of the electrolyser and fuel cell as hydrogen storage system. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 42(5), 3294–3308 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Fan, R.J. Hyndman, The price elasticity of electricity demand in South Australia. Energy Policy 39(6), 3709–3719 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Faruqui, S. Sergici, Household response to dynamic pricing of electricity: a survey of 15 experiments. J. Regul. Econ. 38(2), 193–225 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Faruqui, S. Sergici, N. Lessem, D. Mountain, F. Denton, B. Spencer, C. King, Impact Evaluation of Ontario’s Time-of- Use Rates: First Year Analysis (The Brattle Group, Cambridge, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Ji, D.X. Niu, G.H. Huang, An inexact two-stage stochastic robust programming for residential micro-grid management-based on random demand. Energy 67, 186–199 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Nojavan, H. Qesmati, K. Zare, H. Seyyedi, Large consumer electricity acquisition considering time-of-use rates demand response programs. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 39(12), 8913–8923 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. CPLEX 12. [Online]. Available: https://www.gams.com/latest/docs/S_CPLEX.html. Accessed 15 Jul 2018

  17. A. Brooke, D. Kendrick, A. Meeraus, R. Raman, R.E. Rosenthal, GAMS a User’s Guide Introduction 1 (GAMS Development Corporation, Washington, DC, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dadfar, S. (2019). Robust Energy Procurement Under Time-of-Use Pricing. In: Nojavan, S., Shafieezadeh, M., Ghadimi, N. (eds) Robust Energy Procurement of Large Electricity Consumers . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03229-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03229-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03228-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03229-6

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics