Improving QoS Parameters Based on Traffic Type for AODV Routing Protocol in MANET

  • H. Sai SrujanEmail author
  • A. Sudhakar
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies book series (LNDECT, volume 26)


Mobile Ad hoc network is a self-configuring, an autonomous system and self organizing infrastructure less network of mobile nodes. These nodes are mobile in nature, used to move anywhere and communicating with each node in the network. Though it is ease in development and infrastructure less in nature the MANET makes highly popular for multimedia applications. In a MANET, the transmission and reception of the data between the source and destination depend on the performance of the traffic type (data type and application type). The objective of this paper is to compare the TCP/FTP and UDP/CBR for AODV routing protocol and used to compare the parameters like Packet delivery ratio, throughput and improved the QoS parameters of the AODV protocol. The effectiveness of the proposed scheme is analyzed using the simulated results.


MANET AODV routing protocol QoS parameters Network simulator (NS-2.34) 


  1. 1.
    Mamatha, G.S., Sharma, S.C.: Analyzing MANET variations, challenges, capacity and protocol issues. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. Surv. 1(1), 14–21 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kumar, G.V., Reddyr, Y.V., Nagendra, M.: Current research work on routing protocols for MANET: a literature survey. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2(3), 706–713 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moudni, H., Er-rouidi, M., Mouncif, H., El Hadadi, B.: Performance analysis of AODV routing protocol in MANET with the influence of routing attacks. In: 2nd International Conference on Electrical and Information Technologies ICEIT 2016 (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abbas, A.M., Kure, O.: Quality of service in mobile ad hoc networks: a survey. Int. J. Ad hoc Ubiquit. Comput. 6(2), 75–98 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Karimi, M., Pan, D.: Challenges for quality of service in mobile ad-hoc networks. IEEE Commun. (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Singh, Y., Siwach, M.V.: Quality of service in MANET. Int. J. Innovations Eng. Technol. 1(3) (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lin, C.R., Liu, J.S.: QoS routing in ad hoc wireless network. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 17(8), 1426–1438 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sarma, A., Chakraborty, S., Nandi, S.: Deciding handover points based on context-aware load balancing in a WiFi-WiMAX heterogeneous network environment. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 65(1), 348–357 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aggarwal, N., Chohan, T.S., Singh, K., Vohra, R., Bahel, S.: Relative analysis of AODV & DSDV routing protocols for MANET based on NS2. In: IEEE Communications, pp. 3500–3503, March 2016Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anumeha, Mallick, B.: Enhancing the performance of AODV protocol. Int. J. Adv. Technol. Eng. Sci. 3, 110–117 (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu, S., Yang, Y., Wang, W.: Research of AODV routing protocol for ad hoc network. AASRI Procedia 5, 21–31 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sharma, R., Gupta, K.: Comparison based performance analysis of UDP/CBR and TCP/FTP traffic under the AODV routing protocol in MANET. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 56(15) (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kumar, A., Singla, A.K.: Performance evaluation of MANET routing protocols on the basis of TCP traffic pattern. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Converg. Serv. 1(5), 41 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Singla, V., Kumar, A., Singla, R.: CBR and TCP based performance comparison of various protocols of MANET: a review. Nat. J. Adv. Comput. Manag. 1(2), (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clausen, T., Jacquet, P., Viennot, L.: Comparative Study of CBR and TCP Performance of MANET Routing Protocols. Mind pass Center for Distributed Systems (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ECEGMR Institute of TechnologyRazamIndia

Personalised recommendations