Advertisement

Support Vector Neural Network and Principal Component Analysis for Fault Diagnosis of Analog Circuits

  • D. BinuEmail author
  • B. S. Kariyappa
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies book series (LNDECT, volume 26)

Abstract

Fault diagnosis of the analog circuits is the trending research area as the analog circuits holds a lot of applications in military, automatic control, household appliances, communication, and so on. Even though the researchers presented various methods for fault diagnosis, still there is a lack of reliable techniques for analog fault detection and diagnosis. Keeping this mind, this paper presents the Support Vector Neural Network (SVNN) for identifying the faulty and the fault-free analog circuit. At first, the pre-processing is carried out using the Principle component analysis (PCA) that serves as the best way for solving the dimensional complexities. Then, the weights of SVNN are optimally tuned using the Genetic Algorithm (GA) that enables the optimal classification of the analog circuits. The GA-based SVNN is an optimization approach for classifying the analog circuits that enable the comprehensive diagnosis of the faults in the analog circuits. The experimentation is performed using the triangular wave generator and the simulation results highlight that SVNN classifier attained a classification percentage of 99.54% and low False Alarm Rate of 0.68%.

Keywords

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) Support Vector Neural Network (SVNN) Genetic Algorithm (GA) Analog circuits Fault diagnosis 

References

  1. 1.
    Pecht, M., Jaai, R.: A prognostics and health management roadmap for information and electronics-rich systems. Microelectron. Reliab. 50, 317–323 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tadeusiewicz, M., Hałgas, S., Korzybski, M.: Multiple catastrophic fault diagnosis of analog circuits considering the component tolerances. Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl. 40, 1041–1052 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cui, Y., Shi, J., Wang, Z.: Analog circuits fault diagnosis using multi-valued Fisher’s fuzzy decision tree (MFFDT). Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl. 44(1), 240–260 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Luo, H., Wang, Y., Cui, J.: A SVDD approach of fuzzy classification for analog circuit fault diagnosis with FWT as pre-processor. Expert Syst. Appl. 8, 10554–10561 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tan, Y., Sun, Y., Yin, X.: Analog fault diagnosis using S-transform preprocessor and a QNN classifier. Measurement 46, 2174–2183 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aminian, F., Aminian, M., Collins, H.W.: Analog fault diagnosis of actual circuits using neural networks. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Measur. 51(3), 544–550 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yuan, L., He, Y., Huang, J., Sun, Y.: A new neural-network-based fault diagnosis approach for analog circuits by using kurtosis and entropy as a preprocessor. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Measur. 59(3), 586–595 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alippi, C., Catelani, M., Fort, A., Mugnaini, M.: SBT soft fault diagnosis in analog electronic circuits: a sensitivity-based approach by randomized algorithms. IEEE Transactions on instrumentation and measurement 51(5), 1116–1125 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stošović, M.A., Milić, M., Zwolinski, M., Litovski, V.: Oscillation-based analog diagnosis using artificial neural networks based inference mechanism. Comput. Electr. Eng. 39, 190–201 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xiao, Y., He, Y.: A novel approach for analog fault diagnosis based on neural networks and improved kernel PCA. Neurocomputing 74, 1102–1115 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cui, J., Wang, Y.: A novel approach of analog circuit fault diagnosis using support vector machines classifier. Measurement 44, 281–289 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xiao, Y., Feng, L.: A novel linear ridgelet network approach for analog fault diagnosis using wavelet-based fractal analysis and kernel PCA as preprocessors. Measurement 45, 297–310 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kumar, A., Singh, A.P.: Fuzzy classifier for fault diagnosis in analog electronic circuits. ISA Trans. 52(6), 816–824 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Luo, H., Wang, Y., Lin, H., Jiang, Y.: Module level fault diagnosis for analog circuits based on system identification and genetic algorithm. Measurement 45, 769–777 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Catelania, M., Fort, A.: Fault diagnosis of electronic analog circuits using a radial basis function network classifier. Measurement 28, 147–158 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Luo, H., Wei, L., Wang, Y., Wanga, L., Zhao, X.: A novel approach for analog fault diagnosis based on stochastic signal analysis and improved GHMM. Measurement 81, 26–35 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Labib, K., Rao Vemuri, V.: An application of principal component analysis to the detection and visualization of computer network attacks. In: Proceedings of SAR (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ludwig, O., Nunes, U., Araujo, R.: Eigenvalue decay: a new method for neural network regularization. Neurocomputing 124, 33–42 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Binu, D., Kariyappa, B.S.: A survey on fault diagnosis of analog circuits: Taxonomy and state of the art. AEU Int. J. Electron. Commun. 73, 68–83 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ECE Department, R V College of EngineeringVTU UniversityBelgaumIndia

Personalised recommendations