Excessive gambling behavior is a complex psychopathological phenomenon, characterized by the interaction of multiple etiological factors and by a very heterogeneous symptomatological expression. To date, there are no existing evidence-based “best practice” treatment standards for gambling disorder. Healthcare providers and clinicians are further challenged by the difficulty in reaching out to individuals suffering from gambling problems. Despite a surge of empirical studies on various therapeutic approaches addressing disordered gambling, there is an urgent need for the development of suitable and cost-effective helping tools. This chapter presents a narrative overview of recent advances in the development of and research on innovative treatment approaches and treatment modalities for gambling problems, ranging from training interventions based on addiction models, such as Cognitive Bias Modification and general cognitive training programs; neuromodulation techniques, and employment of modern digital technology to promote large-scale support services and overcome treatment barriers, to personalization of existing interventions to individual and culture-based characteristics and preferences, and integration of multiple methods. Each section of this chapter presents existing preliminary evidence for such novel treatment approaches in the domain of disordered gambling and, when not available, results in the broader field of addictive behaviors. Altogether, these novel venues of research on gambling interventions share the goal of enhancing therapeutic effects and overcoming barriers and limitations to existing treatment programs by meeting the heterogeneous needs and demands of this peculiar clinical population.
- Gambling disorder
- Problem gambling
- Gambling treatment
- Digital interventions
- Mindfulness-based interventions
- Personalized interventions
- Cognitive training
- Cognitive bias modification
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use onlyLearn about institutional subscriptions
Grant JE, Odlaug BL, Chamberlain SR. Neural and psychological underpinnings of gambling disorder: a review. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2016;65:188–93.
Hodgins DC, Stea JN, Grant JE. Gambling disorders. Lancet. 2011;378(9806):1874–84.
Romanczuk-Seiferth N, Van Den Brink W, Goudriaan AE. From symptoms to neurobiology: pathological gambling in the light of the new classification in DSM-5. Neuropsychobiology. 2014;70(2):95–102.
Thomsen KR, Fjorback LO, Møller A, Lou HC. Applying incentive sensitization models to behavioral addiction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;45:343–9.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.
Stewart SH, Zack M, Collins P, Klein RM, Fragopoulos F. Sub-typing pathological gamblers on the basis of affective motivations for gambling: relations to gambling problems, drinking problems, and affective motivations for drinking. Psychol Addict Behav. 2008;22:257–68.
Milosevic A, Ledgerwood DM. The subtyping of pathological gambling: a comprehensive 1101 review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010;30:988–98.
Cunningham JA. Little use of treatment among problem gamblers. Psychiatr Serv. 2005;56(8):1024–5.
Suurvali H, Hodgins DC, Toneatto T, Cunningham JA. Treatment-seeking among Ontario problem gamblers: results of a population survey. Psychiatr Serv. 2008;59:1343–6.
Gainsbury S, Hing N, Suhonen N. Professional help-seeking for gambling problems: awareness, barriers and motivators for treatment. J Gambl Stud. 2014;30(2):503–19.
Suurvali H, Cordingley J, Hodgins DC, Cunningham J. Barriers to seeking help for gambling problems: a review of the empirical literature. J Gambl Stud. 2009;25(3):407–24.
Cowlishaw S, Merkouris S, Dowling N, Anderson C, Jackson A, Thomas S. Psychological therapies for pathological and problem gambling. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11:CD008937.
Bechara A. Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8(11):1458–63.
Wiers RW, Bartholow BD, van den Wildenberg E, Thush C, Engels RCME, Sher KJ, et al. Automatic and controlled processes and the development of addictive behaviors in adolescents: a review and a model. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2007;86(2):263–83.
Keren G, Schul Y. Two is not always better than one a critical evaluation of two-system theories. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009;4(6):533–50.
Cunningham WA, Zelazo PD. Attitudes and evaluations: a social cognitive neuroscience perspective. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007;11(3):97–104.
Gladwin TE, Figner B, Crone EA, Wiers RW. Addiction, adolescence, and the integration of control and motivation. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2011;1(4):364–76.
Wiers RW, Gladwin TE, Hofmann W, Salemink E, Ridderinkhof KR. Cognitive bias modification and cognitive control training in addiction and related psychopathology: mechanisms, clinical perspectives, and ways forward. Clin Psychol Sci. 2013a;1:192–212.
Gladwin TE, Wiers CE, Wiers RW. Interventions aimed at automatic processes in addiction: considering necessary conditions for efficacy. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2017;13:19–24.
Kopetz CE, Lejuez CW, Wiers RW, Kruglanski a W. Motivation and self-regulation in addiction: a call for convergence. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013;8(1):3–24.
Lewis M. The biology of desire: why addiction is not a disease. NY: Public Affairs; 2015.
Miller W, Rollnick G. Motivational interviewing: helping people change. NY: Guilford; 2013.
Stacy AW, Wiers RW. Implicit cognition and addiction: a tool for explaining paradoxical behavior. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:551–75.
Wiers RW, Eberl C, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. Retraining automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients’ approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychol Sci. 2011;22(4):490–7.
Eberl C, Wiers RW, Pawelczack S, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. Approach bias modification in alcohol dependence: do clinical effects replicate and for whom does it work best? Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2013;4:38–51.
Franken IHA. Drug craving and addiction: integrating psychological and neuropsychopharmacological approaches. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2003;27(4):563–79.
Robinson TE, Berridge KC. The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Rev. 1993;18(3):247–91.
Robinson TE, Berridge KC. The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: some current issues. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 2008;363(1507):3137–46.
Hudson A, Olatunji BO, Gough K, Yi S, Stewart SH. Eye on the prize: high-risk gamblers show sustained selective attention to gambling cues. J Gambl Iss. 2016:100–19.
Hønsi A, Mentzoni RA, Molde H, Pallesen S. Attentional bias in problem gambling: a systematic review. J Gambl Stud. 2013;29(3):359–75.
Bickel WK, Landes RD, Kurth-Nelson Z, Redish AD. A quantitative signature of self- control repair: rate-dependent effects of successful addiction treatment. Clin Psychol Sci. 2014;2(6):685–95.
Bickel WK, Yi R, Landes RD, Hill PF, Baxter C. Remember the future: working memory training decreases delay discounting among stimulant addicts. Biol Psychiatry. 2011;69(3):260–5.
Houben K, Wiers RW, Jansen A. Getting a grip on drinking behavior: training working memory to reduce alcohol abuse. Psychol Sci. 2011;22(7):968–75.
MacLeod C, Rutherford E, Campbell L, Ebsworthy G, Holker L. Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias. J Abnorm Psychol. 2002;111(1):107–23.
MacLeod C, Mathews A. Cognitive bias modification approaches to anxiety. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2012;8:189–217.
Taylor CT, Amir N. Modifying automatic approach action tendencies in individuals with elevated social anxiety symptoms. Behav Res Ther. 2012;50(9):529–36.
Kakoschke N, Kemps E, Tiggemann M. Approach bias modification training and consumption: a review of the literature. Addict Behav. 2016;64:21–8.
Posner MI, Snyder CRR, Davidson BJ. Attention and the detection of signals. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1980;109(2):160–74.
Mathews A, MacLeod C. Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1(1):167–95.
Cox WM, Fadardi JS, Pothos EM. The addiction-stroop test: theoretical considerations and procedural recommendations. Psychol Bull. 2006;132(3):443–76.
MacLeod C, Mathews A, Tata P. Attentional bias in emotional disorders. J Abnorm Psychol. 1986;95(1):15–20.
Field M, Cox WM. Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: a review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;97:1–20.
Munafò M, Mogg K, Roberts S, Bradley BP, Murphy M. Selective processing of smoking- related cues in current smokers, ex-smokers and never-smokers on the modified Stroop task. J Psychopharmacol. 2003;17(3):310–6.
Bradley BP, Field M, Mogg K, De Houwer J. Attentional and evaluative biases for smok- ing cues in nicotine dependence: component processes of biases in visual orienting. Behav Pharmacol. 2004;15(1):29–36.
Johnsen BH, Laberg JC, Cox WM, Vaksdal A, Hugdahl K. Alcoholic subjects’ attentional bias in the processing of alcohol-related words. Psychol Addict Behav. 1994;8(2):111–5.
Cox WM, Blount JP, Rozak AM. Alcohol abusers’ and nonabusers’ distraction by alcohol and concern-related stimuli. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2000;26(3):489–95.
Field M, Eastwood B, Bradley BP, Mogg K. Selective processing of cannabis cues in regular cannabis users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006;85(1):75–82.
Franken IHA, Kroon LY, Wiers RW, Jansen A. Selective cognitive processing of drug 1203 cues in heroin dependence. J Psychopharmacol. 2000;14(4):395–400.
Hester R, Dixon V, Garavan H. A consistent attentional bias for drug-related material in active cocaine users across word and picture versions of the emotional Stroop task. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006;81(3):251–7.
Shafran R, Lee M, Cooper Z, Palmer RL, Fairburn CG. Attentional bias in eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord. 2007;40(4):369–80.
Townshend JM, Duka T. Attentional bias associated with alcohol cues: differences between heavy and occasional social drinkers. Psychopharmacology. 2001;157(1):67–74.
Bruce G, Jones BT. A pictorial Stroop paradigm reveals an alcohol attentional bias in heavier compared to lighter social drinkers. J Psychopharmacol. 2004;18(4):527–33.
Field M, Mogg K, Bradley BP. Cognitive bias and drug craving in recreational cannabis users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004;74(1):105–11.
Christiansen P, Schoenmakers TM, Field M. Less than meets the eye: reappraising the clinical relevance of attentional bias in addiction. Addict Behav. 2015;44:43–50.
Boyer M, Dickerson M. Attentional bias and addictive behaviour: automaticity in a gambling-specific modified Stroop task. Addiction. 2003;98(1):61–70.
Molde H, Pallesen S, Sætrevik B, Hammerborg DK, Laberg JC, Johnsen B-H. Attentional biases among pathological gamblers. Int Gambl Stud. 2010;10(1):45–59.
Brevers D, Cleeremans A, Bechara A, Laloyaux C, Kornreich C, Verbanck P, Noël X. Time course of attentional bias for gambling information in problem gambling. Psychol Addict Behav. 2011;25(4):675.
Ciccarelli M, Nigro G, Griffiths MD, Cosenza M, D’Olimpio F. Attentional bias in non-problem gamblers, problem gamblers, and abstinent pathological gamblers: an experimental study. J Affect Disord. 2016;206:9–16.
Ciccarelli M, Nigro G, Griffiths MD, Cosenza M, D’Olimpio F. Attentional biases in problem and non-problem gamblers. J Affect Disord. 2016;198:135–41.
Vizcaino EJV, Fernandez-Navarro P, Blanco C, Ponce G, Navio M, Moratti S, Rubio G. Maintenance of attention and pathological gambling. Psychol Addict Behav. 2013;27(3):861–7.
Brevers D, Cleeremans A, Tibboel H, Bechara A, Kornreich C, Verbanck P, Noël X. Reduced attentional blink for gambling-related stimuli in problem gamblers. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2011;42(3):265–9.
Wölfling K, Mörsen CP, Duven E, Albrecht U, Grüsser SM, Flor H. To gamble or not to gamble: at risk for craving and relapse-learned motivated attention in pathological gambling. Biol Psychol. 2011;87(2):275–81.
van Holst RJ, van Holstein M, van den Brink W, Veltman DJ, Goudriaan AE. Response inhibition during cue reactivity in problem gamblers: an FMRI study. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e30909.
McCusker CG. Cognitive biases and addiction: an evolution in theory and method. Addiction. 2001;96(1):47–56.
McGrath DS, Meitner A, Sears CR. The specificity of attentional biases by type of gambling: an eye-tracking study. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0190614.
Field M, Duka T, Eastwood B, Child R, Santarcangelo M, Gayton M. Experimental manipulation of attentional biases in heavy drinkers: do the effects generalise? Psychopharmacology. 2007;192(4):593–608.
Field M, Eastwood B. Experimental manipulation of attentional bias increases the motivation to drink alcohol. Psychopharmacology. 2005;183(3):350–7.
Schoenmakers TM, Wiers RW, Jones BT, Bruce G, Jansen ATM. Attentional re- 1254 training decreases attentional bias in heavy drinkers without generalization. Addiction. 2007;102(3):399–405.
Schoenmakers TM, de Bruin M, Lux IFM, Goertz AG, Van Kerkhof DHAT, Wiers RW. Clinical effectiveness of attentional bias modification training in abstinent alcoholic patients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;109(1):30–6.
Fadardi JS, Cox WM. Reversing the sequence: reducing alcohol consumption by over- coming alcohol attentional bias. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009;101(3):137–45.
Cox WM, Fadardi JS, Hosier SG, Pothos EM. Differential effects and temporal course of attentional and motivational training on excessive drinking. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015;23(6):445.
McHugh RK, Murray HW, Hearon BA, Calkins AW, Otto MW. Attentional bias and craving in smokers: the impact of a single attentional training session. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010;12(12):1261–4.
Begh R, Munafò MR, Shiffman S, Ferguson SG, Nichols L, Mohammed MA, Holder RL, Sutton S, Aveyard P. Lack of attentional retraining effects in cigarette smokers attempting cessation: a proof of concept double-blind randomised controlled trial. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;149:158–65.
Attwood AS, O’Sullivan H, Leonards U, Mackintosh B, Munafò MR. Attentional bias training and cue reactivity in cigarette smokers. Addiction. 2008;103(11):1875–82.
Field M, Duka T, Tyler E, Schoenmakers T. Attentional bias modification in tobacco smokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009;11(7):812–22.
Kerst WF, Waters AJ. Attentional retraining administered in the field reduces smokers’ attentional bias and craving. Health Psychol. 2014;33(10):1232–40.
Lopes FM, Pires AV, Bizarro L. Attentional bias modification in smokers trying to quit: a longitudinal study about the effects of number of sessions. J Subst Abus Treat. 2014;47(1):50–7.
Elfeddali I, de Vries H, Bolman C, Pronk T, Wiers RW. A randomized controlled trial of web-based attentional bias modification to help smokers quit. Health Psychol. 2016;35(8):870–80.
Kemps E, Tiggemann M, Hollitt S. Biased attentional processing of food cues and modification in obese individuals. Health Psychol. 2014a;33(11):1391–401.
Kemps E, Tiggemann M, Orr J, Grear J. Attentional retraining can reduce chocolate consumption. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2014;20(1):94–102.
Kemps E, Tiggemann M, Elford J. Sustained effects of attentional re-training on chocolate consumption. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2015;49:94–100.
Kakoschke N, Kemps E, Tiggemann M. Attentional bias modification encourages healthy eating. Eat Behav. 2014;15(1):120–4.
Boffo M, Willemen R, Pronk T, Wiers RW, Dom G. Effectiveness of two web-based cognitive bias modification interventions targeting approach and attentional bias in gambling problems: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2017;18(1):452.
Field M, Caren R, Fernie G, De Houwer J. Alcohol approach tendencies in heavy drinkers: comparison of effects in a relevant stimulus–response compatibility task and an approach/avoidance Simon task. Psychol Addict Behav. 2011;25(4):697–701.
Wiers RW, Gladwin TE, Rinck M. Should we train alcohol-dependent patients to avoid alcohol? Front Psych. 2013;4:33.
Kersbergen I, Woud ML, Field M. The validity of different measures of automatic alcohol action tendencies. Psychol Addict Behav. 2015;29(1):225.
Krieglmeyer R, Deutsch R. Comparing measures of approach–avoidance behaviour: the manikin task vs. two versions of the joystick task. Cognit Emot. 2010;24(5):810–28.
Field M, Mogg K, Bradley BP. Craving and cognitive biases for alcohol cues in social drinkers. Alcohol Alcohol. 2005;40(6):504–10.
Wiers RW, Rinck M, Dictus M, Van Den Wildenberg E. Relatively strong automatic appetitive action-tendencies in male carriers of the OPRM1 G-allele. Genes Brain Behav. 2009;8(1):101–6.
Bradley BP, Field M, Healy H, Mogg K. Do the affective properties of smoking-related cues influence attentional and approach biases in cigarette smokers? J Psychopharmacol. 2008;22(7):737–45.
Wiers CE, Kühn S, Javadi AH, Korucuoglu O, Wiers RW, Walter H, et al. Automatic approach bias towards smoking cues is present in smokers but not in ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology. 2013c;229(1):187–97.
Watson P, de Wit S, Wiers RW. Motivational mechanisms underlying the approach bias to cigarettes. J Exp Psychopathol. 2013;4(3):250–62.
Cousijn J, Goudriaan AE, Wiers RW. Reaching out towards cannabis: approach-bias in heavy cannabis users predicts changes in cannabis use. Addiction. 2011;106(9):1667–74.
Wiers RW, Rinck M, Kordts R, Houben K, Strack F. Retraining automatic action-tendencies to approach alcohol in hazardous drinkers. Addiction. 2010;105(2):279–87.
Veenstra EM, de Jong PJ. Restrained eaters show enhanced automatic approach tendencies towards food. Appetite. 2010;55(1):30–6.
Havermans RC, Giesen JCAH, Houben K, Jansen A. Weight, gender, and snack appeal. Eat Behav. 2011;12(2):126–30.
Kemps E, Tiggemann M. Approach bias for food cues in obese individuals. Psychol Health. 2015;30(3):370–80.
Kakoschke N, Kemps E, Tiggemann M. Combined effects of cognitive bias for food cues and poor inhibitory control on unhealthy food intake. Appetite. 2015;87:358–64.
Kakoschke N, Kemps E, Tiggemann M. Differential effects of approach bias and eating style on unhealthy food consumption in overweight and normal weight women. Psychol Health. 2017;32(11):1371–85.
Salmon JP, Boffo M, Smits R, Salemink E, de Jong D, Cowie M, Collins P, Stewart SH, Wiers RW. Measuring implicit biases towards gambling stimuli in problem gamblers from Canada and the Netherlands: lessons learned from cross-cultural internet research. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the National Centre for Responsible Gambling, Las Vegas, NV. 2016.
Boffo M, Smits R, Salmon JP, Cowie M, de Jong DTHA, Salemink E, Collins P, Stewart SH, Wiers RW. Luck, come here! Automatic approach tendencies toward gambling cues in moderate-to-high gamblers. Addiction. 2018;113(2):289–98.
Ostafin BD, Palfai TP. Compelled to consume: the implicit association test and automatic alcohol motivation. Psychol Addict Behav. 2006;20(3):322. 1327.
Palfai TP, Ostafin BD. Alcohol-related motivational tendencies in hazardous drinkers: assessing implicit response tendencies using the modified-IAT. Behav Res Ther. 2003;41(10):1149–62.
Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JL. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;74(6):1464–80.
Wiers RW, Boffo M, Field M. What’s in a trial? On the importance of distinguishing between experimental lab studies and randomized controlled trials: the case of cognitive bias modification and alcohol use disorders. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2018;79(3):333–43.
Boffo M, Zerhouni O, Gronau QF, van Beek RJJ, Nikolaou K, Marsman M, Wiers RW. Cognitive Bias Modification for behavior change in alcohol and smoking addiction: a Bayesian meta-analysis of individual participant data. Neuropsychol Rev. In press.
Manning V, Staiger P, Hall K, Garfield J, Flaks G, Leung D, et al. Cognitive bias modification training during inpatient alcohol detoxification reduces early relapse: a randomized controlled trial. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016;40(9):2011–9.
Eberl C, Wiers RW, Pawelczack S, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. Implementation of approach bias re-training in alcoholism-how many sessions are needed? Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2014;38(2):587–94.
Wittekind CE, Feist A, Schneider BC, Moritz S, Fritzsche A. The approach-avoidance task as an online intervention in cigarette smoking: a pilot study. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2015;46:115–20.
Machulska A, Zlomuzica A, Rinck M, Assion HJ, Margraf J. Approach bias modification in inpatient psychiatric smokers. J Psychiatr Res. 2016;76:44–51.
Larsen H, Kong G, Becker D, Cavallo DA, Cousijn J, Salemink E, et al. Cognitive bias modification combined with cognitive behavioral therapy: a smoking cessation intervention for adolescents. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;146.
Brockmeyer T, Hahn C, Reetz C, Schmidt U, Friederich HC. Approach bias modification in food craving – a proof-of-concept study. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2015;23(5):352–60.
Dickson H, Kavanagh DJ, MacLeod C. The pulling power of chocolate: effects of approach–avoidance training on approach bias and consumption. Appetite. 2016;99:46–51.
Kakoschke N, Kemps E, Tiggemann M. The effect of combined avoidance and control training on implicit food evaluation and choice. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2017;55:99–105.
Becker D, Jostmann NB, Wiers RW, Holland RW. Approach avoidance training in the eating domain: testing the effectiveness across three single session studies. Appetite. 2015;85:58–65.
Rabinovitz S, Nagar M. Possible end to an endless quest? Cognitive bias modification for excessive multiplayer online gamers. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015;18(10):581–7.
Snippe L, Boffo M, Willemen R, Dom G, Wiers RW. The added effectiveness of online approach bias modification atop internet-based CBT with chat-based guidance for problem gamblers. Manuscript in preparation.
Hofmann W, De Houwer J, Perugini M, Baeyens F, Crombez G. Evaluative conditioning in humans: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2010;136(3):390–421.
Rooke SE, Hine DW, Thorsteinsson EB. Implicit cognition and substance use: a meta-analysis. Addict Behav. 2008;33(10):1314–28.
Houben K, Wiers RW. Implicitly positive about alcohol? Implicit positive associations predict drinking behavior. Addict Behav. 2008;33(8):979–86.
Spruyt A, Lemaigre V, Salhi B, Van Gucht D, Tibboel H, Van Bockstaele B, et al. Implicit attitudes towards smoking predict long-term relapse in abstinent smokers. Psychopharmacology. 2015;232(14):2551–61.
Ellis EM, Kiviniemi MT, Cook-Cottone C. Implicit affective associations predict snack choice for those with low, but not high levels of eating disorder symptomatology. Appetite. 2014;77:122–30.
Stewart MJ, Yi S, Stewart SH. Effects of gambling-related cues on the activation of implicit and explicit gambling outcome expectancies in regular gamblers. J Gambl Stud. 2014;30:653–68.
Stewart MJ, Stewart SH, Yi S, Ellery M. Predicting gambling behaviour and problems from implicit and explicit positive gambling outcome expectancies in regular gamblers. Int Gambl Stud. 2015;15(1):124–40.
Stiles M, Hudson A, Ramasubbu C, Ames S, Yi S, Gough K, Stewart SH. The role of memory associations in excessive and problem gambling. J Gambl Iss. 2016;34:120–39.
Yi S, Kanetkar V. Implicit measures of attitudes toward gambling: an exploratory study. J Gambl Iss. 2010;24(24):140–63.
Brevers D, Cleeremans A, Hermant C, Tibboel H, Kornreich C, Verbanck P, Noël X. Implicit gambling attitudes in problem gamblers: positive but not negative implicit associations. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2013;44(1):94–7.
de Houwer J, Thomas S, Baeyens F. Association learning of likes and dislikes: a review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychol Bull. 2001;127(6):853–69.
Raes AK, De Raedt R. The effect of counterconditioning on evaluative responses and harm expectancy in a fear conditioning paradigm. Behav Ther. 2012;43(4):757–67.
Houben K, Havermans RC, Wiers RW. Learning to dislike alcohol: conditioning negative implicit attitudes toward alcohol and its effect on drinking behavior. Psychopharmacology. 2010;211(1):79–86.
Houben K, Schoenmakers TM, Wiers RW. I didn’t feel like drinking but I don’t know why: the effects of evaluative conditioning on alcohol-related attitudes, craving and behavior. Addict Behav. 2010;35(12):1161–3.
Hollands GJ, Prestwich A, Marteau TM. Using aversive images to enhance healthy food choices and implicit attitudes: an experimental test of evaluative conditioning. Health Psychol. 2011;30(2):195–203.
Lebens H, Roefs A, Martijn C, Houben K, Nederkoorn C, Jansen A. Making implicit mea- sures of associations with snack foods more negative through evaluative conditioning. Eat Behav. 2011;12(4):249–53.
Hensels IS, Baines S. Changing “gut feelings” about food: an evaluative conditioning effect on implicit food evaluations and food choice. Learn Motiv. 2016;55:31–44.
Shaw JA, Forman EM, Espel HM, Butryn ML, Herbert JD, Lowe MR, Nederkoorn C. Can evaluative conditioning decrease soft drink consumption? Appetite. 2016;105:60–70.
Walsh EM, Kiviniemi MT. Changing how I feel about the food: experimentally manipulated affective associations with fruits change fruit choice behaviors. J Behav Med. 2014;37(2):322–31.
Friese M, Hofmann W, Wiers RW. On taming horses and strengthening riders: recent developments in research on interventions to improve self-control in health behaviors. Self Identity. 2011;10(3):336–51.
Houben K, Havermans RC, Nederkoorn C, Jansen A. Beer a no-go: learning to stop responding to alcohol cues reduces alcohol intake via reduced affective associations rather than increased response inhibition. Addiction. 2012;107(7):1280–7.
Houben K, Nederkoorn C, Wiers RW, Jansen A. Resisting temptation: decreasing alcohol related affect and drinking behavior by training response inhibition. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011;116(1–3):132–6.
Otto MW, Eastman A, Lo S, Hearon BA, Bickel WK, Zvolensky M, et al. Anxiety sensitivity and working memory capacity: risk factors and targets for health behavior promotion. Clin Psychol Rev. 2016;49:67–78.
Mendrek A, Monterosso J, Simon SL, Jarvik M, Brody A, Olmstead R, et al. Working memory in cigarette smokers: comparison to non-smokers and effects of abstinence. Addict Behav. 2006;31(5):833–44.
Loughead J, Wileyto EP, Ruparel K, Falcone M, Hopson R, Gur R, Lerman C. Working memory-related neural activity predicts future smoking relapse. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015;40(6):1311–20.
Patterson F, Jepson C, Loughead J, Perkins K, Strasser AA, Siegel S, et al. Working memory deficits predict short-term smoking resumption following brief abstinence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;106(1):61–4.
Wiers RW, Boelema SR, Nikolaou K, Gladwin TE. On the development of implicit and control processes in relation to substance use in adolescence. Curr Addict Rep. 2015;2:141–55.
Ellingson JM, Fleming KA, Vergés A, Bartholow BD, Sher KJ. Working memory as a moderator of impulsivity and alcohol involvement: testing the cognitive-motivational theory of alcohol use with prospective and working memory updating data. Addict Behav. 2014;39(11):1622–31.
Sharbanee JM, Stritzke WGK, Wiers RW, Young P, Rinck M, MacLeod C. The interaction of approach-alcohol action tendencies, working memory capacity, and current task goals predicts the inability to regulate drinking behavior. Psychol Addict Behav. 2013;27(3):649–61.
Thush C, Wiers RW, Ames SL, Grenard JL, Sussman S, Stacy AW. Interactions between implicit and explicit cognition and working memory capacity in the prediction of alcohol use in at-risk adolescents. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;94(1–3):116–24.
Khurana A, Romer D, Betancourt LM, Brodsky NL, Giannetta JM, Hurt H. Working memory ability predicts trajectories of early alcohol use in adolescents: the mediational role of impulsivity. Addiction. 2013;108(3):506–15.
Grenard JL, Ames SL, Wiers RW, Thush C, Sussman S, Stacy AW. Working memory capacity moderates the predictive effects of drug-related associations on substance use. Psychol Addict Behav. 2008;22(3):426–32.
Becker MP, Collins PF, Luciana M. Neurocognition in college-aged daily marijuana users. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2014.
Coppin G, Nolan-Poupart S, Jones-Gotman M, Small DM. Working memory and reward association learning impairments in obesity. Neuropsychologia. 2014;65:146–55.
Goudriaan AE, Oosterlaan J, De Beurs E, Van Den Brink W. Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling: a comparison with alcohol dependence, Tourette syndrome and normal controls. Addiction. 2006;101(4):534–47.
Albein-Urios N, Martinez-González JM, Lozano Ó, Clark L, Verdejo-García A. Comparison of impulsivity and working memory in cocaine addiction and pathological gambling: implications for cocaine-induced neurotoxicity. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012;126:1–2):1–6.
Yan WS, Li YH, Xiao L, Zhu N, Bechara A, Sui N. Working memory and affective decision- making in addiction: a neurocognitive comparison between heroin addicts, pathological gamblers and healthy controls. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014;134(1):194–200.
Leiserson V, Pihl RO. Reward-sensitivity, inhibition of reward-seeking, and dorsolateral prefrontal working memory function in problem gamblers not in treatment. J Gambl Stud. 2007;23(4):435–55.
Karbach J, Verhaeghen P. Making working memory work: a meta-analysis of executive- control and working memory training in older adults. Psychol Sci. 2014;25(11):2027–37.
Klingberg T, Fernell E, Olesen PJ, Johnson M, Gustafsson P, Dahlström K, et al. Computerized training of working memory in children with ADHD—a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005;44(2):177–86.
Buitenweg JIV, Murre JMJ, Ridderinkhof KR. Brain training in progress: a review of trainability in healthy seniors. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6(183).
Jaeggi SM, Buschkuehl M, Jonides J, Shah P, Morrison AB, Chein JM. Short-and long-term benefits of cognitive training. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(25):46–60.
Shipstead Z, Redick TS, Engle RW. Is working memory training effective? Psychol Bull. 2012;138(4):628–54.
Vugs B, Knoors H, Cuperus J, Hendriks M, Verhoeven L. Executive function training in children with SLI: a pilot study. Child Lang Teach Ther. 2016.
Wesley MJ, Bickel WK. Remember the future II: meta-analyses and functional overlap of working memory and delay discounting. Biol Psychiatry. 2014;75(6):435–48.
Verbeken S, Braet C, Goossens L, van der Oord S. Executive function training with game elements for obese children: a novel treatment to enhance self-regulatory abilities for weight- control. Behav Res Ther. 2013;51(6):290–9.
Houben K, Dassen FC, Jansen A. Taking control: working memory training in overweight individuals increases self-regulation of food intake. Appetite. 2016;105:567–74.
Jones A, Christiansen P, Nederkoorn C, Houben K, Field M. Fluctuating disinhibition: implications for the understanding and treatment of alcohol and other substance use disorders. Front Psych. 2013;4(140).
Nower L, Blaszczynski A. Impulsivity and pathological gambling: a descriptive model. Int Gambl Stud. 2006;6(1):61–75.
Goudriaan AE, Oosterlaan J, De Beurs E, Van Den Brink W. Decision making in pathological gambling: a comparison between pathological gamblers, alcohol dependents, persons with Tourette syndrome, and normal controls. Cogn Brain Res. 2005;23:137–51.
Fuentes D, Tavares H, Artes R, Gorenstein C. Self-reported and neuropsychological measures of impulsivity in pathological gambling. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006;12(6):907–12.
Brevers D, Cleeremans A, Verbruggen F, Bechara A, Kornreich C, Verbanck P, Noël X. Impulsive action but not impulsive choice determines problem gambling severity. PLoS One. 2012;7(11).
Devos G, Clark L, Maurage P, Kazimierczuk M, Billieux J. Reduced inhibitory control pre- dicts persistence in laboratory slot machine gambling. Int Gambl Stud. 2015;15(3):408–21.
Grant JE, Chamberlain SR, Schreiber LRN, Odlaug BL, Kim SW. Selective decision-making deficits in at-risk gamblers. Psychiatry Res. 2011;189(1):115–20.
Verdejo-García A, Lawrence AJ, Clark L. Impulsivity as a vulnerability marker for substance- 1529 use disorders: review of findings from high-risk research, problem gamblers and genetic 1530 association studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008;32(4):777–810.
Jones A, Field M. The effects of cue-specific inhibition training on alcohol consumption in heavy social drinkers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013;21(1):8–16.
Allom V, Mullan B. Two inhibitory control training interventions designed to improve eating behaviour and determine mechanisms of change. Appetite. 2015;89:282–90.
Veling H, van Koningsbruggen GM, Aarts H, Stroebe W. Targeting impulsive processes of eating behavior via the internet. Effects on body weight. Appetite. 2014;78:102–9.
Allom V, Mullan B, Hagger M. Does inhibitory control training improve health behaviour? A meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. 2015;7199(6):1–38.
de Wit H. Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: a review of underlying processes. Addict Biol. 2009;14:22–31.
Jones A, Christiansen P, Nederkoorn C, Houben K, Field M. Fluctuating Disinhibition: implications for the understanding and treatment of alcohol and other substance use disorders. Front Psych. 2013;4(140).
Gauggel S, Heusinger A, Forkmann T, Boecker M, Lindenmeyer J, Miles Cox W, Staedtgen M. Effects of alcohol cue exposure on response inhibition in detoxified alcohol-dependent patients. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010;34(9):1584–9.
Jones A, Guerrieri R, Fernie G, Cole J, Goudie A, Field M. The effects of priming restrained versus disinhibited behaviour on alcohol-seeking in social drinkers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011b;113:55–61.
Houben K, Nederkoorn C, Jansen A. Eating on impulse: the relation between overweight and food-specific inhibitory control. Obesity. 2014;22(5):E6–8.
Jones A, Field M. Alcohol-related and negatively-valenced cues increase motor and oculomotor disinhibition in social drinkers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015;23:122–9.
Fillmore MT, Rush CR, Marczinski CA. Effects of d-amphetamine on behavioral control in stimulant abusers: the role of prepotent response tendencies. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003;71(2):143–52.
Logan G, Cowan W. On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a theory of an act of control. Psychol Rev. 1984;91:295–327.
Verbruggen F, Logan GD. Automatic and controlled response inhibition: associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008;137(4):649–72.
Jones A, McGrath E, Houben K, Nederkoorn C, Robinson E, Field M. A comparison of three types of web-based inhibition training for the reduction of alcohol consumption in problem drinkers: study protocol. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):796.
Veling H, Holland RW, van Knippenberg A. When approach motivation and behavioral inhibition collide: behavior regulation through stimulus devaluation. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2008;44(4):1013–9.
Jones A, Di Lemma LCG, Robinson E, Christiansen P, Nolan S, Tudur-Smith C, Field M. Inhibitory control training for appetitive behaviour change: a meta-analytic investigation of mechanisms of action and moderators of effectiveness. Appetite. 2016;7:16–28.
Houben K, Jansen A. Chocolate equals stop: chocolate-specific inhibition training reduces chocolate intake and go associations with chocolate. Appetite. 2015;87:318–23.
Veling H, Aarts H, Papies EK. Using stop signals to inhibit chronic dieters’ responses toward palatable foods. Behav Res Ther. 2011;49(11):771–80.
Houben K, Jansen A. Training inhibitory control. A recipe for resisting sweet temptations. Appetite. 2011;56(2):345–9.
van Koningsbruggen GM, Veling H, Stroebe W, Aarts H. Comparing two psychological interventions in reducing impulsive processes of eating behaviour: effects on self-selected portion size. Br J Health Psychol. 2014;19(4):767–82.
Veling H, Aarts H, Stroebe W. Using stop signals to reduce impulsive choices for palatable unhealthy foods. Br J Health Psychol. 2013;18(2):354–68.
Houben K. Overcoming the urge to splurge: influencing eating behavior by manipulating inhibitory control. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2011;42(3):384–8.
Lawrence NS, O’Sullivan J, Parslow D, Javaid M, Adams RC, Chambers CD, et al. Training response inhibition to food is associated with weight loss and reduced energy intake. Appetite. 2015;95:17–28.
Ferrey AE, Frischen A, Fenske MJ. Hot or not: response inhibition reduces the hedonic value and motivational incentive of sexual stimuli. Front Psych. 2012;3:575.
Jansen JM, Daams JG, Koeter MW, Veltman DJ, van den Brink W, Goudriaan AE. Effects of non-invasive neurostimulation on craving: a meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37(10):2472–80.
Lefaucheur JP, André-Obadia N, Antal A, Ayache SS, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Cantello RM, Cincotta M, de Carvalho M, De Ridder D, Devanne H, Di Lazzaro V, Filipović SR, Hummel FC, Jääskeläinen SK, Kimiskidis VK, Koch G, Langguth B, Nyffeler T, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Poulet E, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell JC, Schönfeldt-Lecuona C, Siebner HR, Slotema CW, Stagg CJ, Valls-Sole J, Ziemann U, Paulus W, Garcia-Larrea L. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2014;125(11):2150–206.
Tortella G, Casati R, Aparicio LV, Mantovani A, Senço N, D’Urso G, Brunelin J, Guarienti F, Selingardi PM, Muszkat D, Junior BS, Valiengo L, Moffa AH, Simis M, Borrione L, Brunoni AR. Transcranial direct current stimulation in psychiatric disorders. World J Psychiatry. 2015;5(1):88–102.
De Ridder D, Vanneste S, Kovacs S, Sunaert S, Dom G. Transient alcohol craving suppression by rTMS of dorsal anterior cingulate: an fMRI and LORETA EEG study. Neurosci Lett. 2011;496(1):5–10.
Sauvaget A, Trojak B, Bulteau S, Jiménez-Murcia S, Fernández-Aranda F, Wolz I, Menchón JM, Achab S, Vanelle JM, Grall-Bronnec M. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in behavioral and food addiction: a systematic review of efficacy, technical, and methodological issues. Front Neurosci. 2015;9.
He Q, Chen M, Chen C, Xue G, Feng T, Bechara A. Anodal stimulation of the left DLPFC increases IGT scores and decreases delay discounting rate in healthy males. Front Psych. 2016;7:1421.
Brevet-Aeby C, Brunelin J, Iceta S, Padovan C, Poulet E. Prefrontal cortex and impulsivity: interest of noninvasive brain stimulation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;71:112–34.. He Q, Chen M, Chen C, Xue G, Feng T, Bechara A. Anodal stimulation of the left DLPFC increases IGT scores and decreases delay discounting rate in healthy males. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1421
Goudriaan AE, Oosterlaan J, de Beurs E, Van den Brink W. Pathological gambling: a comprehensive review of biobehavioral findings. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004;28(2):123–41.
van Holst RJ, van den Brink W, Veltman DJ, Goudriaan AE. Why gamblers fail to win: a review of cognitive and neuroimaging findings in pathological gambling. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010;34(1):87–107.
Hone-Blanchet A, Ciraulo DA, Pascual-Leone A, Fecteau S. Noninvasive brain stimulation to suppress craving in substance use disorders: review of human evidence and methodological considerations for future work. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015;59:184–200.
Zack M, Cho SS, Parlee J, Jacobs M, Li C, Boileau I, Strafella A. Effects of high frequency repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation and continuous theta burst stimulation on gam- bling reinforcement, delay discounting, and stroop interference in men with pathological gambling. Brain Stimul. 2016;9(6):867–75.
Rosenberg O, Klein LD, Dannon PN. Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of pathological gambling. Psychiatry Res. 2013;206(1):111–3.
Chervyakov AV, Chernyavsky AY, Sinitsyn DO, Piradov MA. Possible mechanisms under- lying the therapeutic effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9:303.
den Uyl TE, Gladwin TE, Rinck M, Lindenmeyer J, Wiers RW. A clinical trial with com- bined transcranial direct current stimulation and alcohol approach bias retraining. Addict Biol. 2017;22(6):1632–40.
den Uyl TE, Gladwin TE, Wiers RW. Electrophysiological and behavioral effects of combined transcranial direct current stimulation and alcohol approach bias retraining in hazardous drinkers. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016;40(10):2124–33.
European Gaming and Betting Association. Market reality. 2017.
Gainsbury SM. Online gambling addiction: the relationship between internet gambling and disordered gambling. Curr Addict Rep. 2015;2(2):185.
Statista. Size of the online gaming market from 2003 to 2020 (in billion U.S. dollars). 2017.
Yardley L, Patrick K, Choudhury T, Michie S. Current issues and future directions for research into digital behavior change interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(5):814–5.
Versluis A, Verkuil B, Spinhoven P, van der Ploeg MM, Brosschot JF. Changing mental health and positive psychological Well-being using ecological momentary interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(6):e152.
Khadjesari Z, Murray E, Hewitt C, Hartley S, Godfrey C. Can stand-alone computerbased interventions reduce alcohol consumption? A systematic review. Addiction. 2011;106(2):267–82.
Kraft P, Yardley L. Current issues and new directions in psychology and health: what is the future of digital interventions for health behaviour change? Psychol Health. 2009;24(6):615–218.
Murray E. Web-based interventions for behavior change and self-management: potential, pitfalls, and progress. Med 20. 2012;1(2):e3.
Cunningham JA, Hodgins DC, Toneatto T, Murphy M. A randomized controlled trial of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31586.
Andersson G, Cuijpers P, Carlbring P, Riper H, Hedman E. Guided internet-based vs. face- to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Psychiatry. 2014;13(3):288–95.
Portnoy DB, Scott-Sheldon LA, Johnson BT, Carey MP. Computer-delivered interventions for health promotion and behavioral risk reduction: a meta-analysis of 75 randomized controlled trials, 1988–2007. Prev Med. 2008;47(1):3–16.
Shingleton RM, Palfai TP. Technology-delivered adaptations of motivational interviewing for health-related behaviors: a systematic review of the current research. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(1):17–35.
Webb T, Joseph J, Yardley L, Michie S. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: 1666 a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(1):e4.
Fiordelli M, Diviani N, Schulz PJ. Mapping mHealth research: a decade of evolution. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(5):e95.
Free C, Phillips G, Galli L, Watson L, Felix L, Edwards P, Patel V, Haines A. The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2013;10(1):e1001362.
Zhao J, Freeman B, Li M. Can mobile phone apps influence people’s health behavior change? An evidence review. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(11):e287.
DeSmet A, Van Ryckeghem D, Compernolle S, Baranowski T, Thompson D, Crombez G, et al. A meta-analysis of serious digital games for healthy lifestyle promotion. Prev Med. 2014;69:95–107.
Johnson D, Deterding S, Kuhn K-A, Staneva A, Stoyanov S, Hides L. Gamification for health and wellbeing: a systematic review of the literature. Internet Interv. 2016;6:89–106.
Primack BA, Carroll MV, McNamara M, Klem ML, King B, Rich M, et al. Role of video games in improving health-related outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(6):630–8.
Turner WA, Casey LM. Outcomes associated with virtual reality in psychological interventions: where are we now? Clin Psychol Rev. 2014;34(8):634–44.
Valmaggia LR, Latif L, Kempton MJ, Rus-Calafell M. Virtual reality in the psychological treatment for mental health problems: an systematic review of recent evidence. Psychiatry Res. 2016;236:189–95.
Hodgins DC. Becoming a winner: defeating problem gambling: a self-help manual for problem gamblers. Calgary, AB, Canada: Calgary Regional Health Authority; 2002.
Ladouceur R, Lachance S. Overcoming pathological gambling. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
Carlbring P, Smit F. Randomized trial of internet-delivered self-help with telephone support for pathological gamblers. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008;76(6):1090–4.
Carlbring P, Degerman N, Jonsson J, Andersson G. Internet-based treatment of pathological gambling with a three-year follow-up. Cogn Behav Ther. 2012;41(4):321–34.
Castren S, Pankakoski M, Tamminen M, Lipsanen J, Ladouceur R, Lahti T. Internet-based CBT intervention for gamblers in Finland: experiences from the field. Scand J Psychol. 2013;54(3):230–5.
Cunningham JA, Hodgins DC, Toneatto T, Rai A, Cordingley J. Pilot study of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers. Behav Ther. 2009;40:219–24.
Luquiens A, Lagadec M, Tanguy M, Reynaud M. Efficacy of online psychotherapies in poker gambling disorder: an online randomized clinical trial. Eur Psychiatry. 2015;30:1053.
Canale N, Vieno A, Griffiths MD, Marino C, Chieco F, Disperati F, Andriolo S, Santinello M. The efficacy of a web-based gambling intervention program for high school students: a preliminary randomized study. Comput Hum Behav. 2016;55:946–54.
Cunningham JA, Hodgins DC, Bennett K, Bennett A, Talevski M, Mackenzie CS, Hendershot CS. Online interventions for problem gamblers with and without co-occurring mental health symptoms: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):624.
Hodgins DC, Fick GH, Murray R, Cunningham JA. Internet-based interventions for disordered gamblers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of online self-directed cognitive-behavioural motivational therapy. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):1.
Swan JL. The evaluation of an Internet-based self-directed motivational enhancement inter- vention for problem and pathological gamblers. Doctoral dissertation, University of Calgary. 2014.
Hodgins DC, Currie SR, Currie G, Fick GH. Randomized trial of brief motivational treat- ments for pathological gamblers: more is not necessarily better. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009;77(5):950–60.
MacLeod C, Clarke PJ. The attentional bias modification approach to anxiety intervention. Clin Psychol Sci. 2015;3(1):58–78.
Wiers RW, Houben K, Fadardi JS, van Beek P, Rhemtulla MT, Cox WM. Alcohol cognitive bias modification training for problem drinkers over the web. Addict Behav. 2015b;40:21–6.
Bullen C, Rossen F, Newcombe D, Whittaker R, Strydom J. Smartphone-based Problem Gambling Evaluation and Technology Testing Initiative (‘SPGETTI’) feasibility study: final report. National Institute for Health Innovation & Centre for Addiction Research. Prepared for the Ministry of Health. Auckland, New Zealand: Auckland UniServices Limited, The University of Auckland. 2015.
Loranger C, Bouchard S, Boulanger J, Robillard G. Validation of two virtual environments for the prevention and treatment of pathological gambling. J Cyber Ther Rehabil. 2011;4:233–5.
Giroux I, Faucher-Gravel A, St-Hilaire A, Boudreault C, Jacques C, Bouchard S. Gambling exposure in virtual reality and modification of urge to gamble. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013;16(3):224–31.
Park CB, Park SM, Gwak AR, Sohn BK, Lee JY, Jung HY, Choi SW, Choi JS. The effect of repeated exposure to virtual gambling cues on the urge to gamble. Addict Behav. 2015;41:61–4.
Tárrega S, Castro-Carreras L, Fernández-Aranda F, Granero R, Giner-Bartolomé C, Aymamí N, et al. A serious videogame as an additional therapy tool for training emotional regulation and impulsivity control in severe gambling disorder. Front Psych. 2015;6:1721.
van der Stel J. Precision in addiction care: does it make a difference? Yale J Biol Med. 2015;88(4):415–22.
Suomi A, Dowling NA, Jackson AC. Problem gambling subtypes based on psychological distress, alcohol abuse and impulsivity. Addict Behav. 2014;39:1741–5.
Conrod PJ, Stewart SH, Pihl RO, Côté S, Fontaine V, Dongier M. Efficacy of brief coping skills interventions that match different personality profiles of female substance abusers. Psychol Addict Behav. 2000;14:231–42.
Conrod PJ, Stewart SH, Comeau MN, Maclean M. Efficacy of cognitive behavioral interventions targeting personality risk factors for youth alcohol misuse. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2006;35:550–63.
Blaszczynski A, Nower L. A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction. 2002;97:487–99.
Juodis M, Stewart S. A method for classifying pathological gamblers according to “enhancement,” “coping,” and “low emotion regulation” subtypes. J Gambl Iss. 2016;34:201–20.
Stewart SH, Buckley M, Darredeau C, Sabourin B, Zahradnik M, Hodgins D, Barrett SP. Brief escape and action treatment for gambling (BEAT gambling): action and escape therapist manuals. Halifax, Canada: Dalhousie University, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience; 2011.
Gooding P, Tarrier N. A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive behavioral interventions to reduce problem gambling: hedging our bets? Behav Res Ther. 2009;47:592–607.
Stewart MJ, Davis MacNevin PL, Hodgins DC, Barrett SP, Swansburg J, Stewart SH. Motivation-matched approach to the treatment of problem gambling: a case series pilot study. J Gambl Iss. 2016;33:124–47.
Stewart SH, Zack M. Development and psychometric evaluation of a three-dimensional gambling motives questionnaire. Addiction. 2008;103(7):1110–7.
Stewart SH. Short-term outcome of a motive-matched treatment for coping and enhancement gamblers: a randomized controlled trial. Invited presentation at the annual meeting of the Alberta Gambling Research Institute, Banff, Alberta, Mar 2013.
Ferrey AE, Burleigh TJ, Fenske MJ. Stimulus-category competition, inhibition, and affective devaluation: a novel account of the uncanny valley. Front Psych. 2015;6:249.
Larsen H, Kong G, Becker D, Cousijn J, Boendermaker W, Cavallo D, Khrishnan-Sarin S, Wiers RW. Implicit motivational processes underlying smoking in American and Dutch adolescents. Front Psych. 2014;5(51).
Hayes SC. Acceptance and commitment therapy and the new behavior therapies: mindfulness, acceptance, and relationship. In: Hayes SC, Follette VM, Linehan MM, editors. Mindfulness and acceptance: expanding the cognitive-behavioral tradition. New York: Guilford Press; 2004. p. 1–29.
Shonin E, Van Gordon W, Griffiths MD. Mindfulness as a treatment for behavioral addiction. J Addict Res Ther. 2014;5:e122.
Marlatt GA. Buddhist philosophy and the treatment of addictive behavior. Cogn Behav Pract. 2002;9(1):44–50.
Kabat-Zinn J. Coming to our senses: healing ourselves and the world through mindfulness. UK: Hachette; 2005.
Griffiths M, Shonin ÁE, Van Gordon ÁW. Mindfulness as a treatment for gambling disorder: current directions and issues. J Gambl Commer Gam Res. 2016;1(1):47–52.
de Lisle SM, Dowling NA, Sabura Allen J. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for problem gambling. Clin Case Stud. 2011;10(3):210–28.
Chiesa A, Serretti A. Mindfulness based cognitive therapy for psychiatric disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2011;187(3):441–53.
Bowen S, Witkiewitz K, Dillworth TM, Chawla N, Simpson TL, Ostafin BD, et al. Mindfulness meditation and substance use in an incarcerated population. Psychol Addict Behav. 2006;20(3):343–7.
Toneatto T. Mindfulness. In: Miller PM, editor. Encyclopedia of addiction. London: Elsevier; 2013.
Lakey CE, Campbell WK, Brown KW, Goodie AS. Dispositional mindfulness as a predictor of the severity of gambling outcomes. Personal Individ Differ. 2007;43(7):1698–710.
de Lisle SM, Dowling NA, Allen JS. Mechanisms of action in the relationship between mindfulness and problem gambling behaviour. Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2014;12(2):206–25.
Riley B. Experiential avoidance mediates the association between thought suppression and mindfulness with problem gambling. J Gambl Stud. 2014;30(1):163–71.
McKeith CFA, Rock AJ, Clark GI. Trait mindfulness, problem-gambling severity, altered state of awareness and urge to gamble in poker-machine gamblers. J Gambl Stud. 2016:1–16.
Shonin E, van Gordon W, Griffiths MD. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and meditation awareness training (MAT) for the treatment of co-occurring schizophrenia and pathological gambling: a case study. Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2014;12(2):181–96.
Toneatto T, Vettese L, Nguyen L. The role of mindfulness in the cognitive-behavioural treatment of problem gambling. J Gambl Iss. 2007;19(19):91–100.
Korman L, Collins J, McMain S, Skinner W, Toneatto T. Concurrent gambling, substance use and anger: Development of a brief integrated treatment. Final Report. Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre. 2005.
Christensen DR, Dowling NA, Jackson AC, Brown M, Russo J, Francis KL, Umemoto A. A proof of concept for using brief dialectical behavior therapy as a treatment for problem gambling. Behav Chang. 2013;30(2):117–37.
Toneatto T, Pillai S, Courtice EL. Mindfulness-enhanced cognitive behavior therapy for problem gambling: a controlled pilot study. Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2014;12(2):197–205.
Chen P, Jindani F, Perry J, Turner NL. Mindfulness and problem gambling treatment. Asian J Gambl Issues Public Health. 2014;4(1):2.
de Lisle SM, Dowling NA, Allen JS. Mindfulness and problem gambling: a review of the literature. J Gambl Stud. 2012;28(4):719–39.
Spijkerman MPJ, Pots WTM, Bohlmeijer ET. Effectiveness of online mindfulness-based interventions in improving mental health: a review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Clin Psychol Rev. 2016;45:102–14.
Preparation of this chapter was partly supported by grants from the National Belgian Lottery (grant: A15/0726) and the US National Center for Responsible Gaming. Additional support has been provided by the Nova Scotia Department of Health and Wellness and the Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation (grant: PSO-SSG-2015-10,036). The contents of this manuscript are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of any of the funding agencies.
Editors and Affiliations
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Snippe, L., Boffo, M., Stewart, S.H., Dom, G., Wiers, R.W. (2019). Innovative Treatment Approaches in Gambling Disorder. In: Heinz, A., Romanczuk-Seiferth, N., Potenza, M. (eds) Gambling Disorder. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03060-5_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03058-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03060-5