Abstract
A design process of the vibration reduction systems is complicated because of their opposite performance requirements [1]. For example, in typical working machines, it is desirable to reduce the vibration transmission from its source to the human operator. Thus, the vibration isolation of operators can be achieved by applying the seat suspension system [2]. From the first point of view, the vibrations transmitted into the body of the operator should be minimised in order to meet health and safety requirements during the workday. Against this background, the suspension relative motion should also be minimised in order to provide the desired controllability of working machine by the operator.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Preumont, A. (2002). Vibration control of active structures an introduction. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kowal, J. (1996). Vibration control (in Polish). Krakow: Gutenberg.
Censor, Y. (1977). Pareto optimality in multiobjective problems. Applied Mathematics Optimization, 4, 41–59.
Marler, R. T., & Arora, J. S. (2004). Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 26, 369–395.
Maciejewski, I. (2012). Shaping the vibro-isolation properties of vibration reduction systems used for protection of working machines operators (in Polish). Koszalin: Academic Publishing of the Koszalin University of Technology.
Tarnowski, W. (2009). Optimisation and polyoptimisation in mechatronics (in Polish). Koszalin: Academic Publishing of the Koszalin University of Technology.
Tarnowski W., Krzyzynski T., Maciejewski I., Olekiewicz R. (2011). Poly-optimization: A paradigm in engineering design in mechatronics (pp. 141–156), Archive of Applied Mechanics 81, Springer.
Pianosi, F., Sarrazin, F., & Wagener, T. (2015). A matlab toolbox for global sensitivity analysis. Environmental Modelling and Software, 70, 80–85.
Goh, E. G., & Noborio, K. (2014). Sensitivity analysis using sobol ‘variance-based method on the haverkamp constitutive functions implemented in Richards’ water flow equation. Malaysian Journal of Soil Science, 18, 19–33.
Dejaegher, B., Capron, X., Smeyers-Verbeke, J., & Vander, Heyden Y. (2006). Randomization tests to identify significant effects in experimental designs for robustness testing. Analytica Chimica Acta, 564, 184–200.
Saltelli, A. (2002). Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices. Computer Physics Communications, 145, 280–297.
Saltelli, A., & Annoni, P. (2010). How to avoid a perfunctory sensitivity analysis. Environmental Modeling and Software, 25, 1508–1517.
Saltelli, A., Annoni, P., Azzini, I., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M., & Tarantola, S. (2010). Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and Estimator for the Total Sensitivity Index, Computer Physics Communications, 181, 259–270.
Maciejewski, I. (2012). Control system design of active seat suspensions. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 331, 1291–1309.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krzyzynski, T., Maciejewski, I., Meyer, L., Meyer, H. (2019). Multi-criteria Optimisation of the Vibro-isolation Properties. In: Modelling and Control Design of Vibration Reduction Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03047-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03047-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03046-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03047-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)