Skip to main content

Modelling the Efficacy of Assurance Strategies for Better Integration, Interoperability and Information Assurance in Family-of-System-of-Systems Portfolios

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 438 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 878))

Abstract

Military systems, and more broadly society’s, are increasingly complex and interconnected enabling hitherto only dreamed of capabilities and yet also humanity’s forays into wholesale malicious cyber-warfare. Loosely coupled families-of-systems of systems cooperate and evolve sporadically when using linear lifecycles and project-by-project development, defying capability control and assurance at that mesa-level. The U.S. Defense has evolved systematic ways for their families-of-systems to be progressively more integrated, interoperable and information assured and this is dramatically differentiating its capability assurance from its allies. This paper reports new Markovian testability modelling comparing the abstract efficacy of assurance experimentation and testing strategies employed by Australia Defence against the new U.S. strategies that are now able to quantitatively illustrate the widening gap between these allies. The modelling technique has potential to tailor Australian plans to keep pace with its ally and in modelling civilian families-of-system-of-systems in transportation, energy healthcare and the like.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jenner, S.: Why do projects ‘fail’ and more to the point what can we do about it? The case for disciplined, ‘fast and frugal’ decision-making. Management 45, 6–19 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hecht, M.: Verification of software intensive system reliability and availability through testing and modeling. ITEA J. 36, 304–312 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Courtney, J., Merali, Y., Paradice, D., et al.: On the study of complexity in information systems. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Syst. Approach 1(1), 37–48 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Flyvbjerg, B., Budzier, A.: Why your IT project may be riskier than you think. Harv. Bus. Rev. 24–27 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ahner, D.K.: Better buying power, developmental testing, and scientific test and analysis techniques. ITEA J. 37, 286–290 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Joiner, K.F.: Six-sigma reform and education in Australian Defence: lessons-learned give rigour and efficiency to ordnance, aircraft and ship testing. In: 7th International Conference on Lean Six Sigma, Dubai, United Arab Emirates (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Murphy, T., Leiby, L.D., Glaeser, K., et al.: How scientific test and analysis techniques can assist the chief developmental tester. ITEA J. 36, 96–101 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cofer, D.: Taming the complexity beast. ITEA J. 36, 313–318 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kuhn, D.R., Kacker, R.N., Feldman, L., et al.: Combinatorial testing for cybersecurity and reliability (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Copeland, E.J., Holzer, T.H., Eveleigh, T.J., et al.: The effects of system prototype demonstrations on weapon systems. In: Defense Acquisition Univ FT Belvoir VA (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Joiner, K.F.: How new test and evaluation policy is being used to de-risk project approvals through preview T&E. ITEA J. 36, 288–297 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Joiner, K.F.: How Australia can catch up to US cyber resilience by understanding that cyber survivability test and evaluation drives defense investment. Inf. Secur. J. Glob. Perspect. 26, 74–84 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mead, N.R., Woody, C.: Cyber Security Engineering: A Practical Approach for Systems and Software Assurance. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Joiner, K.F.: Implementing the defence first principles review: two key opportunities to achieve best practice in capability development. In: Strategic Insights: Australian Strategic Policy Institute (2015). www.aspi.org.au

  15. Keating, C.B., Katina, P.F., Joiner, K.F., et al.: A method for identification, representation, and assessment of complex system pathologies in acquisition programs. In: 15th Annual Acquisition Research Symposium, Graduate School of Business & Public Policy at the Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Association IS: Standard for Fail-Safe Design of Autonomous and Semi-Autonomous Systems P7009 (under development) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Joiner, K.F., Tutty, M.G.: A tale of two allied defence departments: new assurance initiatives for managing increasing system complexity, interconnectedness and vulnerability. Aust. J. Multi-Discipl. Eng. 14, 4–25 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tutty, M.G.: The profession of arms in the information age: operational joint fires capability preparedness in a small-world. University of South Australia (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Layton, P.: Fifth-generation air warfare. Aust. Def. Force J. 204, 23–32 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Efatmaneshnik, M., Shoval, S., Ryan, M.: A framework for testability analysis from system architecture perspective. In: INCOSE Annual Symposium, Washington, D.C., 18–22 July 2018 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Australian Senate and Australian National Audit Office (ANAO): Test and Evaluation of Major Defence Equipment Acquisitions (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Elele, J.N., Hall, D.H., Davis, M.E., et al.: M&S requirements and VV&A requirements: what’s the relationship? ITEA J. 37, 333–341 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Authors are gracious for rich and helpful dissuasions with CMDR Kate Miller, whose insights facilitated shaping this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahmoud Efatmaneshnik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Joiner, K., Efatmaneshnik, M., Tutty, M. (2019). Modelling the Efficacy of Assurance Strategies for Better Integration, Interoperability and Information Assurance in Family-of-System-of-Systems Portfolios. In: Cardin, M., Hastings, D., Jackson, P., Krob, D., Lui, P., Schmitt, G. (eds) Complex Systems Design & Management Asia. CSD&M 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 878. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02886-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02886-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02885-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02886-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics