Advertisement

Internet Regulation: A Text-Based Approach to Media Coverage

  • Anna ShirokanovaEmail author
  • Olga Silyutina
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 858)

Abstract

Internet regulation in Russia has vigorously expanded in recent years to transform the relatively free communication environment of the 2000s into a heavily regulated one. Our goal was to identify the topic structure of Russian media discourse on Internet regulation and compare it between political and non-political media outlets. We used structural topic modeling on 7,240 texts related to Internet regulation that appeared in the Russian media in 2009–2017. We discovered the non-linear dynamics and the larger share of political media covering Internet regulation over years and compared the topics specific to political and non-political media outlets. We found out that most topics had a different share between political and non-political media and that discourse on law belongs largely to the political media. We also identified four clusters in the topics of media coverage of Internet regulation in Russia related to the law, norms, politics, and business, and the time references of particular topics. In addition, we show the parallel dynamics of the topics on site blockings and political opposition and provide the background on legislation and public opinion on Internet regulation in Russia. Our results demonstrate a rather politicized nature of Internet regulation and its connection to a broader political context in Russia.

Keywords

Internet regulation Russia Structural topic modeling 

References

  1. 1.
    Asmolov, G.: Welcoming the Dragon: The Role of Public Opinion in Russian Internet Regulation. Internet Policy Observatory (2015). http://repository.upenn.edu/internetpolicyobservatory/8
  2. 2.
    Åström, J., Karlsson, M., Linde, J., Pirannejad, A.: Understanding the rise of e-participation in non-democracies: domestic and international factors. Gov. Inf. Q. 29(2), 142–150 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.09.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blei, D.M.: Probabilistic topic models. Commun. ACM 55(4), 77–84 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993–1022 (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bodrunova, S.S., Litvinenko, A.A.: Four Russias in communication: fragmentation of the Russian public sphere in the 2010s. In: Dobek-Ostrowska, B., Głowacki, M. (eds.) Democracy and Media in Central and Eastern Europe 25 Years On, pp. 63–79. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deibert, R., Palfrey, J., Rohozinski, R., Zittrain, J., Haraszti, M.: Access Controlled: The Shaping of Power, Rights, and Rule in Cyberspace. MIT Press, Cambridge (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Diamond, L.: Liberation technology. J. Democr. 21(3), 69–83 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.0.0190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Göbel, C.: The information dilemma: how ICT strengthen or weaken authoritarian rule. Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift 115(4), 386–402 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Greene, D., O’Callaghan, D., Cunningham, P.: How many topics? Stability analysis for topic models. In: Calders, T., Esposito, F., Hüllermeier, E., Meo, R. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2014. LNCS, vol. 8724, pp. 498–513. Springer, Heidelberg (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44848-9_32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jacobi, C., van Atteveldt, W., Welbers, K.: Quantitative analysis of large amounts of journalistic texts using topic modelling. Digit. J. 4(1), 89–106 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1093271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kiriya, I.: The culture of subversion and Russian media landscape. Int. J. Commun. 6, 446–466 (2012). http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1196
  12. 12.
    King, G., Pan, J., Roberts, M.E.: How the Chinese government fabricates social media posts for strategic distraction, not engaged argument. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 111(3), 484–501 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Koltsova, O., Shcherbak., A.: “LiveJournal Libra!”: The political blogosphere and voting preferences in Russia in 2011–2012. New Media Soc. 17(10), 1715–1732 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814531875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lancichinetti, A., Fortunato, S.: Community detection algorithms: a comparative analysis. Phys. Rev. E 80(5), 56–117 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.80.056117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    MacKinnon, R.: China’s ‘networked authoritarianism’. J. Democr. 22(2), 32–46 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2011.0033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marechal, N.: Networked authoritarianism and the geopolitics of information: understanding Russian Internet policy. Media Commun. 5(1), 29–41 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v5i1.808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McCombs, M.: Setting the Agenda: Mass Media and Public Opinion. Polity Press, Cambridge (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nisbet, E.C.: Benchmarking Public Demand: Russia’s Appetite for Internet Control. Internet Policy Observatory (2015). http://repository.upenn.edu/internetpolicyobservatory/9
  19. 19.
    Nocetti, J.: Contest and conquest: Russia and global internet governance. Int. Aff. 91(1), 111–130 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nocetti, J.: Russia’s ‘dictatorship-of-the-law’ approach to internet policy. Internet Policy Rev. 4(4) (2015).  https://doi.org/10.14763/2015.4.380
  21. 21.
    Nocetti, J.: ‘Digital Kremlin’: power and the internet in Russia. Russie. Nei. Visions 59, 5 (2011). https://www.ifri.org
  22. 22.
    Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Airoldi, E.M.: A model of text for experimentation in the social sciences. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 111(515), 988–1003 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2016.1141684MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Roberts, M.E., et al.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 58(4), 1064–1082 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Safe Internet League. http://www.ligainternet.ru/en/
  25. 25.
    Shirokanova, A., Silyutina, O.: Internet regulation media coverage in Russia: topics and countries. In: Proceedings of 10th ACM Conference on Web Science (WebSci 2018), 5 pages. ACM, New York (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3201064.3201102
  26. 26.
    Smyth, R., Oates, S.: Mind the gaps: media use and mass action in Russia. Eur. Asia Stud. 67(2), 285–305 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2014.1002682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Soldatov, A., Borogan, I.: Russia’s surveillance state. World Policy J. 30(3), 23–30 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0740277513506378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Van Dijk, J.A.G.M., Hacker, K.M.: Internet and Democrac in the Network Society. Routledge, Oxford (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhao, W., et al.: A heuristic approach to determine an appropriate number of topics in topic modeling. BMC Bioinform. 16(Suppl. 13), S8 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-16-S13-S8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory for Comparative Social ResearchNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia
  2. 2.National Research University Higher School of EconomicsSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations