Skip to main content

Measurement of Public Interest in Ecological Matters Through Online Activity and Environmental Monitoring

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Transformation and Global Society (DTGS 2018)

Abstract

Taking into account the global world trends in the development of digital technologies and their diffusion into the economic and social space, it is proposed to use indicators of social interest in ecological matters (environmental responsibility and environmental concerns) for the population of Russian regions. An original approach to the estimation of these indicators according to the online activity of the population was proposed. It was found out that the data on the number, prevalence and dynamics of search queries for keywords related to environmental pollution, cleanliness of water and air, reflect the degree of responsibility and concern of the population with the environmental situation in the region and can be considered as an indirect indicator of environmental ill-being. Dependencies have been established between indicators of environmental interest and environmental monitoring data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The CALFED Bay-Delta Program, also known as CALFED, is a department within the government of California, administered under the California Resources Agency.

References

  1. Angelstam, P., Andersson, K., et al.: Solving problems in social-ecological systems: definition, practice and barriers of transdisciplinary research. Ambio 42(2), 254–265 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0372-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arias-Arévalo, P., Martín-López, B., Gómez-Baggethun, E.: Exploring intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values for sustainable management of social-ecological systems. Ecol. Soc. 22(4), 43 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09812-220443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Armitage, D., Béné, C., Charles, A.T., Johnson, D., Allison, E.H.: The interplay of well-being and resilience in applying a social-ecological perspective. Ecol. Soc. 17(4), 15 (2012). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04940-170415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Askitas, N., Klaus, F.: Zimmermann Google econometrics and unemployment forecasting. Appl. Econ. Q. 55(2), 107–120 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barnes, M.L., Bodin, Ö., Guerrero, A.M., McAllister, R.J., Alexander, S.M., Robins, G.: The social structural foundations of adaptation and transformation in social–ecological systems. Ecol. Soc. 22(4), 16 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09769-220416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Becerra, G., Amozurrutia, J.A.: Rolando García’s “Complex Systems Theory” and its relevance to sociocybernetics. J. Sociocybernetics 13(15), 18–30 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bershadskaya, L., Chugunov, A., Trutnev, D.: Information society development in Russia: measuring progress and gaps. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia, EGOSE 2014, pp. 7–13. ACM, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Booher, D.E., Innes, J.E.: Governance for resilience: CALFED as a complex adaptive network for resource management. Ecol. Soc. 15(3), 35 (2010). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss3/art35/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bookchin, M.: Social Ecology and Communalism, 136 p. AK Press, Oakland (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bordino, I., Battiston, S., Caldarelli, G., Cristelli, M., et al.: Web search queries can predict stock market volumes. PLoS ONE 7(7), e40014 (2012). http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0040014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brockhaus, M., Di Gregorio, M.: National REDD + policy networks: from cooperation to conflict. Ecol. Soc. 19(4), 14 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06643-190414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Central Baltic Programme 2014–2020 project database. http://database.centralbaltic.eu/stats

  13. Chugunov, Andrei V., Bolgov, R., Kabanov, Y., Kampis, G., Wimmer, M. (eds.): DTGS 2016. CCIS, vol. 674. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49700-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Costs for environmental protection as a percentage of GDP. In: EMISS. https://fedstat.ru/indicator/57339

  15. Cumming, Graeme S.: Theoretical frameworks for the analysis of social–ecological systems. In: Sakai, S., Umetsu, C. (eds.) Social-Ecological Systems in Transition. GES, pp. 3–24. Springer, Tokyo (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54910-9_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Curme, Ch., Preis, To., H. Stanley, E., Moat, H.S.: Quantifying the semantics of search behavior before stock market moves. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 111(32), 11600–11605 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ecological situation in Russia: monitoring. Press Release No. 3430. https://wciom.ru/index.php?id=236&uid=116333. (in Russian)

  18. Ecology. Poll 19–22 May 2017/ Levada Center. https://www.levada.ru/2017/06/05/ekologiya/. (in Russian)

  19. Alcamo, J., et al.: Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment/Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 245 p. Island Press, Washington, D.C. (2003). Contributed by Bennett, E.M., et al.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Environmental problems of our time. https://ecoportal.info/category/ecoproblem/

  21. Environmental tax revenues. In: Eurostat DataDatabase. http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do

  22. Ettredge, M., Gerdes, J., Karuga, G.: Using web-based search data to predict macroeconomic statistics. Commun. ACM 48(11), 87–92 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Federal Law No. 96-FZ of 04.05.1999 (as amended on 13.07.2015) “On the Protection of Atmospheric Air”. http://www.consultant.ru/

  24. FEE Annual Report 2016. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/550aa28ae4b0f34c8f787b74/t/591d6c0a59cc6827ccc15e9f/1495100465903/FEE_AnnualReport2016.pdf

  25. Forum for ecologists. http://forum.integral.ru. (in Russian)

  26. Ginsberg, J., Mohebbi, M.H., Patel, R.S., Brammer, L., et al.: Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data. Nature 457(7232), 1012–1014 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Goel, S., Hofman, J.M., Lahaie, S., Pennock, D.M., Duncan, J.: Watts predicting consumer behavior with Web search. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107(41), 17486–17490 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gofman, K.G.: Economic mechanism of nature use in the transition to a market economy. Econ. Math. Methods 27(2), 315–321 (1991). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gofman, K.G.: Transition to the market and the ecologization of the tax system in Russia. Econ. Math. Methods, 30(4) (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Halliday, A., Glaser, M.: A Management Perspective on Social Ecological Systems: A generic system model and its application to a case study from Peru. Human Ecol. Rev. 18(1), 1–18 (2011). http://www.humanecologyreview.org/pastissues/her181/halliday.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hauck, J., Schmidt, J., Werner, A.: Using social network analysis to identify key stakeholders in agricultural biodiversity governance and related land-use decisions at regional and local level. Ecol. Soc. 21(2), 49 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08596-210249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hermans, L.M.: Exploring the promise of actor analysis for environmental policy analysis: lessons from four cases in water resources management. Ecol. Soc. 13(1), 21 (2008). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art21/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. International Society of Ecological Economics (ISEE). http://www.isecoeco.org

  34. Kabanov Yu., Sungurov A.: E-Government development factors: evidence from the Russian regions. digital transformation and global society. In: First International Conference, DTGS 2016, St. Petersburg, Russia, June 22–24, 2016, Revised Selected Papers. Chugunov, A.V., Bulgov, R., Kabanov, Y., Kampis, G., Wimmer, M. (Eds.), pp. 85–96 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kabanov, Y., Romanov, B.: Interaction between the internet and the political regime: an empirical study (1995–2015). In: Alexandrov, Daniel A., Boukhanovsky, Alexander V., Chugunov, Andrei V., Kabanov, Y., Koltsova, O. (eds.) DTGS 2017. CCIS, vol. 745, pp. 282–291. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69784-0_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Kristoufek, L.: Can Google Trends search queries contribute to risk diversification? Sci. Rep. 3, 2713 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Krivosheyeva, Ye.S.: On the way to ecological consciousness. Bull. Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University, 1, 177–183 (2010). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Leontiev, V., Ford, D.: Interbranch analysis of the impact of the structure of the economy on the environment. Econ. Math. Methods, Vol. VIII, 3, 370–400 (1972). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Leontiev, V.: Impact on the environment and economic structure: the “input-output” approach. In: Economic Essays, pp. 318–339. Politizdat, Moscow (1990) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mancilla, R.G.: Introduction to Sociocybernetics (Part 1): Third order cybernetics and a basic framework for society. J. Sociocybernetics 9(1/2), 35–56 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mancilla, R.G.: Introduction to Sociocybernetics (Part 2): Power. Cult. Inst. J. Sociocybernetics 10(1/2), 45–71 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mancilla, R.G.: Introduction to Sociocybernetics (Part 3): Fourth Order Cybernetics. J. Sociocybernetics 11(1/2), 47–73 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  43. McGinnis, M.D., Ostrom, E.: Social-ecological system framework: initial changes and continuing challenges. Ecol. Soc. 19(2), 30 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06387-190230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ministry of Ecology of Chelyabinsk region. http://www.mineco174.ru/

  45. National map of environmental violations. https://ria.ru/ecomap/. (in Russian)

  46. Ostrom, E.: A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325, 419–422 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Ostrom, E., Cox, M.: Moving beyond panaceas: a multi-tiered diagnostic approach for social-ecological analysis. Environ. Conserv. 37(4), 451–463 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892910000834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Rytov, G.L.: Concerning the necessity of ecological culture creation in mane and society. Izvestiya of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1(4), 776–779 (2009) (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sokolov, B., Yusupov, R., Verzilin, Dm., Sokolova, I., Ignatjev, M.: Methodological Basis of socio-cyber-physical systems structure-dynamics control and management. Digital Transformation and Global Society First International Conference, DTGS 2016, St. Petersburg, Russia, June 22–24, 2016, Revised Selected Papers. Chugunov, A.V., Bulgov, R., Kabanov, Y., Kampis, G., Wimmer, M. (Eds.), pp. 610–618 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  50. State report “On the state and protection of the environment of the Russian Federation in 2016”: Ministry of Natural Resources of Russia; NIA-Nature. 760 p. (2017). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  51. TEEB: The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity Ecological and Economic Foundations. Ed. by Kumar, P.: Earthscan, London and Washington. 456 p (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  52. TEEB: The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity in local and regional policy and management. Ed. by Wittmer, H., Gundimeda, H.: Routledge, 384 p. (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Temporary sample methodology for determining the economic efficiency of implementing environmental measures and assessing economic damage caused to the national economy by environmental pollution. Approved by the decision of the State Planning Committee of the USSR, Gosstroy USSR and the Presidium of the USSR Academy of Sciences on October 21, 1983 No. 254/284/134. Economics (1986). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  54. The ECA initiative (interregional non-governmental organization). http://ecamir.ru/O-dvizhenii-EKA.html. (in Russian)

  55. The Forum of the Ecological Initiative of Russia (2017). https://vk.com/ecoforum2017. (in Russian)

  56. The Foundation for Environmental Education (FEE) is officially registered as a charity in England (registered charity number 1148274) under the address 74. http://www.greenkey.global/join-fee/

  57. The interactive project “Landfill Map”. http://www.kartasvalok.ru/request/171102-558

  58. The network of initiative groups “Musora.Bolshe.Net”. http://musora.bolshe.net/page/main.html (in Russian)

  59. The State Program of the Russian Federation “Environmental Protection” for 2012–2020: Approved by Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation of April 15, 2014 No. 326. http://programs.gov.ru/Portal/programs/passport/12. (in Russian)

  60. Thematic maps on the environmental situation in St. Petersburg. http://gov.spb.ru/gov/otrasl/ecology/maps/. (in Russian)

  61. Tobeyev, A.M.: The concept of ecological consciousness/Toboev A.I. The concept of ecological consciousness. Bullet. Omsk State Pedagogical University. Humanit. Res. 3(7). 23–26 (2015). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Transforming the economy: sustaining food, water, energy and justice: 2016 ISEE Conference/International Society of Ecological Economics (ISEE) Conference. (2016). http://www.isecoeco.org/isee-2016-conference/

  63. Uhl, C.: Developing ecological consciousness: paths to a sustainable future, 288 p. Published March 14th 2013 by Rowman & Littlefield Publishers (2013). ISBN 1442218312

    Google Scholar 

  64. United Nations Environment Programme. https://www.unenvironment.org/explore-topics/environment-under-review/why-does-environment-under-review-matter

  65. Veretennikov, N.Ya.: Globalization of environmental consciousness. In: Proceedings of the Saratov University. New episode. Series Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy. 14(2), 11–15 (2014). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Versilin D.N., Maksimova T.G., Antokhin Yu.N.: Development of digital technologies for multicriteria estimation of the state of ecological and economic objects. In: Statistics in the digital economy: teaching and use: materials of the international scientific and practical conference (St. Petersburg, 1–2 February 2018). SPb.: Publishing house SPbSEU. pp. 176–177 (2018). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Verzilin, D., Maximova, T., Sokolova, I.: Online socioeconomic activity in Russia: patterns of dynamics and regional diversity. In: Alexandrov, Daniel A., Boukhanovsky, Alexander V., Chugunov, Andrei V., Kabanov, Y., Koltsova, O. (eds.) DTGS 2017. CCIS, vol. 745, pp. 55–69. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69784-0_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  68. Verzilin, D.N., Maksimova, T.G., Antokhin, Yu.N.: Socio-economic and ecological indicators of the state of ecological and economic objects: genesis and development. In: Society: Politics, Economics, Law 2017. 12 (2017). http://www.dom-hors.ru/vipusk-12-2017-obshchestvo-politika-ekonomika-pravo/. (in Russian)

  69. Vidiasova, L., Chugunov, A.: eGov Services’ consumers in the process of innovations’ diffusion: the case from St. Petersburg. In: Alexandrov, Daniel A., Boukhanovsky, Alexander V., Chugunov, Andrei V., Kabanov, Y., Koltsova, O. (eds.) DTGS 2017. CCIS, vol. 745, pp. 199–208. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69784-0_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  70. What in the environmental situation is most worried about people? And are they ready for ecological behavior?/Group of Companies Foundation Public Opinion. http://fom.ru/Obraz-zhizni/13693. (in Russian)

  71. Zagutin, D.S., Nagnibeda B.A., Samygin, S.I.: Problems of development of social ecology in the aspect of ensuring industrial safety. In: Humanitarian, socio-economic and social sciences (2017). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research described in this paper is partially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grants 15-08-08459, 16-07-00779, 17-08-00797, 17-06-00108), Russian Humanitarian Found (grants 15-04-00400), state research 0073–2018–0003, Vladimir Potanin Charitable Foundation grant GSGK-37/18.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dmitry Verzilin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Verzilin, D., Maximova, T., Antokhin, Y., Sokolova, I. (2018). Measurement of Public Interest in Ecological Matters Through Online Activity and Environmental Monitoring. In: Alexandrov, D., Boukhanovsky, A., Chugunov, A., Kabanov, Y., Koltsova, O. (eds) Digital Transformation and Global Society. DTGS 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 858. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02843-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02843-5_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02842-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02843-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics