Skip to main content

Setting Up

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
100 Years of NCVO and Voluntary Action
  • 910 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter Davis Smith explores the factors leading to the formation of the National Council of Social Service (NCSS) in 1919. He examines the three main voluntary organisations active at the turn of the twentieth century—the Charity Organisation Society, Guild of Help, and Council of Social Welfare—and the pressures leading to greater collaboration. He argues that it was forces unleashed by the First World War that finally persuaded them to put their differences to one side in pursuit of greater unity. The establishment of the Council is told with reference to the key men and women active in the voluntary movement at this time, such as Edward Birchall, Percy Grundy, Frederic D’Aeth, Thomas Hancock Nunn, and Dorothy Keeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Manchester Guardian, 29 March 1919, p. 10; Daily Herald, 12 May 1919.

  2. 2.

    On developments in the voluntary movement at the beginning of the twentieth century, see, for example, Harris, 2010, and Thane, 2012.

  3. 3.

    Quoted in Harrison, 2003, p. 82.

  4. 4.

    Quoted in Brasnett, 1969, p. 2.

  5. 5.

    Ibid., pp. 2–4. On the Agenda and Cavendish clubs, see the prologue. The National Association for the Promotion of Social Science, also known as the Social Science Association, was founded by Lord Brougham to advance public health, industrial relations, penal reform, and female education. It closed in 1886. See Goldman, 2002.

  6. 6.

    On the British Institute of Social Service, see Harris, 1992, p. 121.

  7. 7.

    Brasnett, 1969, pp. 27–28.

  8. 8.

    See, for example, Grant, 2014.

  9. 9.

    Finlayson, 1994. The term was first coined by William Beveridge in his 1948 report, Voluntary Action. Beveridge, 1948.

  10. 10.

    Flanagan, 1991, p. 202; Lowe, 1995b, p. 373.

  11. 11.

    Adderley, 2015, p. 21.

  12. 12.

    The contribution made by these individuals to the establishment of the Council is discussed below.

  13. 13.

    For a range of views on the COS and its work, see Finlayson, 1994, pp. 141–3.

  14. 14.

    On the history of the guilds, see Laybourn, 1994.

  15. 15.

    On the philosophy of the COS, see Lewis, 1995.

  16. 16.

    Finlayson, 1994, pp. 141–3. McBriar, 1987, p. 369, says that the COS later amended their construct of the deserving and undeserving poor to ‘helpable’ and ‘unhelpable’ in face of criticism that they were putting the blame on the victims rather than looking at what character traits would help them escape their situation. Samuel and Henrietta Barnett are perhaps best known for their role in establishing the first university settlement at Toynbee Hall in the east end of London in 1884 and Hampstead Garden Suburb in the early twentieth century.

  17. 17.

    Lewis, 1996, p. 172.

  18. 18.

    Finlayson, 1994, pp. 172–3, and Moore, 1977, p. 97.

  19. 19.

    On the establishment of the Bradford Guild, see Cahill and Jowitt, 1980.

  20. 20.

    Laybourn, 1994, p. 4. On the Elberfeld system, see also Moore, 1977, p. 90.

  21. 21.

    Laybourn, 1994, p. 1.

  22. 22.

    Ibid., p. 49. See also Laybourn, 1993, pp. 54–58.

  23. 23.

    Laybourn, 1994, p. 6.

  24. 24.

    Ibid., p. vii.

  25. 25.

    Ibid., p. 73.

  26. 26.

    Ibid.

  27. 27.

    Ibid., pp. 73–74.

  28. 28.

    Ibid., p. 20.

  29. 29.

    Keeling’s contribution to the Council is discussed more fully in Chap. 5.

  30. 30.

    Adderley, 2015, p. 49.

  31. 31.

    On the Council of Social Welfare movement, see Lewis, 1996.

  32. 32.

    On Nunn, see Moore, 1977 and Davis Smith, 2004.

  33. 33.

    Nunn, 1909.

  34. 34.

    Moore, 1977, pp. 98–99.

  35. 35.

    On the life and work of Nunn, see Anonymous, 1942.

  36. 36.

    Laybourn, 1994, p. 22.

  37. 37.

    Macadam, 1934.

  38. 38.

    Lewis, 1996, p. 173. The 1911 Act, part of the wider social welfare reforms of the Liberal government, 1906–15, introduced two independent contributory schemes of health and unemployment insurance.

  39. 39.

    The Royal Commission on the Poor Laws and Relief of Distress, 1905–09, established to advise on changes to the poor law, produced two conflicting reports, known as the Majority and Minority reports. Beatrice Webb, 1858–1943, a socialist, academic, and social reformer, is perhaps best known for her work in founding the Fabian Society and the London School of Economics.

  40. 40.

    Lewis, 1996, p. 174.

  41. 41.

    Brasnett, 1969, p. 9.

  42. 42.

    Quoted in Brasnett, 1969, p. 11.

  43. 43.

    Grundy, 1913, p. 10.

  44. 44.

    Ibid., p. 18.

  45. 45.

    See the conclusion for a discussion of this issue.

  46. 46.

    National Association of Guilds of Help, 1913, p. 60.

  47. 47.

    The Helper, Bolton Guild, Vol. 7, no. 3, March 1913, pp. 33–8, quoted in Laybourn, 1994, p. 195. Charles Loch, 1849–1923, was secretary of the COS from 1875 to 1914. According to one obituary, ‘He made the COS; he was the COS’, The Times, 25 January 1923, p. 13.

  48. 48.

    D’Aeth, 1914, p. 404.

  49. 49.

    Ibid., pp. 405–7.

  50. 50.

    Ibid., pp. 407–8.

  51. 51.

    Ibid., p. 414.

  52. 52.

    Ibid., p. 414.

  53. 53.

    Laybourn, 1994, p. 25.

  54. 54.

    Ibid.

  55. 55.

    Grant, 2014, p. 144; Finlayson, 1994, p. 205.

  56. 56.

    Grant, 2014, p. 18.

  57. 57.

    For example, Stevenson, 1984, p. 58.

  58. 58.

    For example, Thane, 2012.

  59. 59.

    Pope, 1991, p. 31. See also Lowe, 1995a.

  60. 60.

    Quoted in Grant, 2014, p. 23.

  61. 61.

    On the Prince’s call to service in 1932, see Chap. 4.

  62. 62.

    Laybourn, 1994, p. 127.

  63. 63.

    Ibid., p. 127.

  64. 64.

    Ibid., pp. 135–7.

  65. 65.

    See Grant, 2014, for a detailed analysis of the role played by Ward during the war.

  66. 66.

    Ibid., p. 89. On later concerns over poor fundraising practice, see Chaps. 7, 8, and 10.

  67. 67.

    Laybourn, 1994, p. 148, and Moore, 1977, p. 103.

  68. 68.

    Conference on war relief and personal service, 1915, p. 107.

  69. 69.

    Ibid., p. 107.

  70. 70.

    Ibid., pp. 114–5.

  71. 71.

    Ibid., p. 116.

  72. 72.

    Ibid., p. 151.

  73. 73.

    For a summary of the work of the committee, see A scheme for central and local committees on social service, paper presented to the COS Council, 4 February 1918. Charity Organisation/Family Welfare Association Archives; London Metropolitan Archives (LMA): LMA/A/FWA/C/A/01/016.

  74. 74.

    Brief biographies of these key figures are given below.

  75. 75.

    Reported in Help, the Journal of the Bradford Guild, Vol. 12, no. 1, November 1916; quoted in Laybourn, 1994, p. 149.

  76. 76.

    Moore, 1977, p. 103.

  77. 77.

    See Draft constitution of Joint Committee on Social Service, paper discussed by the COS Administrative Committee, 17 January 1918. Charity Organisation Society/Family Welfare Association Archives; LMA/A/FWA/C/A3/53/1.

  78. 78.

    Ibid.

  79. 79.

    Moore 1977, p. 104. David Thomas, First Viscount Rhondda, 1856–1918, was a Liberal politician and businessman who served in Lloyd George’s wartime Coalition government. He became president of the Board of Trade in 1916.

  80. 80.

    See The place of organisation in voluntary effort in the future, paper discussed by the COS administrative committee, 25 July 1918. Charity Organisation Society/Family Welfare Association Archives; LMA/A/FWA/C/A3/53/1.

  81. 81.

    On the establishment of the Volunteer Centre in 1973, see Chap. 7.

  82. 82.

    Rooff, 1972, p. 118.

  83. 83.

    Brasnett, 1969, p. 17.

  84. 84.

    Ibid., p. 1.

  85. 85.

    Adderley, 2015, pp. 64–65.

  86. 86.

    Anonymous, 1942, p. 173.

  87. 87.

    Brasnett, 1969, p. 22.

  88. 88.

    For a good review of the life and work of Grundy, see Sephton, 2009. For a tribute to Grundy by W.G.S. Adams, see The Village, Vol. 35, Spring 1943, p. 2.

  89. 89.

    On the life and times of D’Aeth, see Simey, 2005.

  90. 90.

    Poole, 1961, pp. 156–159.

  91. 91.

    Jenkins, 2001, p. 159. On Haynes’ tenure at the Council, see Chaps. 5, 6, and 7.

  92. 92.

    Simey, 2004 and 2005. See also Poole, 1961, p. 158.

  93. 93.

    For a tribute to Pringle, see Astbury, 1963.

  94. 94.

    The London COS also decided to remain outside the new Council. See Humphreys, 2001, p. 143.

  95. 95.

    Finlayson, 1994, p. 246.

  96. 96.

    Humphreys, 2001, p. 143.

  97. 97.

    On Ellis, see Chap. 3.

  98. 98.

    See Keeling, 1961.

  99. 99.

    Brasnett, 1969, p. 2.

  100. 100.

    Adams’ contribution to the Council is covered in Chaps. 3, 4, 5, and 6.

  101. 101.

    Ellis, 1931.

  102. 102.

    Symonds was knighted in 1919 and died in 1931. ‘Sir Aubrey Symonds’ The Times, 25 March 1931, p. 16.

  103. 103.

    The Times, 7 February 1950, p. 9.

  104. 104.

    Ibid.

  105. 105.

    NCSS, 1919.

  106. 106.

    Grant, 2014, p. 172.

  107. 107.

    Phillips, 1995, p. 140.

  108. 108.

    Lowe, 1995a, p. 42.

  109. 109.

    Kidd, 1999, p. 108.

  110. 110.

    Grant, 2014, p. 183.

  111. 111.

    See Harrison, 2003.

  112. 112.

    Cole, 1945, p. 26.

  113. 113.

    Laybourn, 1994, p. 153.

  114. 114.

    Humphreys, 2001.

  115. 115.

    Macadam, 1934, p. 68.

References

  • Adderley, S. (2015). Bureaucratic conceptions of citizenship in the voluntary sector (1919–1939): The case of the National Council of Social Service. Unpublished PhD thesis, Bangor University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. (1942). Thomas Hancock Nunn: The life and work of a social reformer, written by his friends for his friends. London: Baines and Scarsbrook Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astbury, B. (1963). John Christian Pringle. Social Service Quarterly, 37(1), 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge, W. (1948). Voluntary action: A report on methods of social advance. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brasnett, M. (1969). Voluntary social action: A history of the National Council of Social Service 1919–69. London: NCSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, M., & Jowitt, T. (1980). The new philanthropy: The emergence of the Bradford City Guild of Help. Journal of Social Policy, 9(3), 359–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, G. D. H. (1945). A retrospect of the history of voluntary social service. In A. Bourdillon (Ed.), Voluntary social services: Their place in the modern state. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conference on war relief and personal service. (1915, June 10–12). Conference on war relief and personal service. Organised by charity organisation societies and guilds of help, Caxton Hall, Westminster. London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aeth, F. (1914). The social welfare movement. The Economic Review, 24(4), 404–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis Smith, J. (2004). Thomas Hancock Nunn. In Oxford dictionary of national biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, L. (1931). Sir Aubrey Vere Symonds. The Social Service Review, 12(4), 67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, G. (1994). Citizen, state, and social welfare in Britain 1830–1990. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, R. (1991). ‘Parish-fed bastards’: A history of the politics of the unemployed in Britain, 1884–1939. Westport: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, L. (2002). Science, reform, and politics in Victorian Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, P. (2014). Philanthropy and voluntary action in the First World War: Mobilizing charity. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundy, S. (1913, June 5–7). Case work and policy: A synthesis. Paper prepared for the sixth annual conference of the National Association of Guilds of Help, Halifax, Guilds of Help.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock Nunn, T. (1909). A council of social welfare. A note and memorandum on the report of the royal commission on the poor law and relief of distress as to the functions and constitution of the new public assistance authority and its local committees. London: Council of Social Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. (1992). Political thought and the welfare state 1870–1940: An intellectual framework for British social policy. Past and Present, 135, 116–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, B. (2010). Voluntary action and the state in historical perspective. Voluntary Sector Review, 1(1), 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, B. (2003). Civil society by accident? Paradoxes of voluntarism and pluralism in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. In J. Harris (Ed.), Civil society in British history – Ideas, identities, institutions (pp. 79–96). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, R. (2001). Poor relief and charity, 1969–1945: The London Charity Organisations Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. (2001). The organization man: George Haynes at the National Council of Social Service. In L. Black et al. (Eds.), Consensus or coercion? The state, the people and social cohesion in post-war Britain (pp. 151–168). Cheltenham: New Clarion Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeling, D. (1961). The crowded stairs: Recollections of social work in Liverpool. London: NCSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, A. (1999). State, society and the poor in nineteenth-century England. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laybourn, K. (1993). The Guild of Help and the changing face of Edwardian philanthropy. Urban History, 20(1), 43–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laybourn, K. (1994). The Guild of Help and the changing face of Edwardian philanthropy: The Guild of Help, voluntary work and the state 1904–1919. Lampeter: The Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. (1995). The voluntary sector, the state and social work in Britain: The Charity Organisation Society/Family Welfare Association since 1869. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. (1996). The boundary between voluntary and statutory social service in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The Historical Journal, 1, 155–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, R. (1995a). Government. In S. Constantine, M. Kirby, & M. Rose (Eds.), The First World War in British history (pp. 29–50). London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, R. (1995b). Welfare’s moving frontier. Twentieth Century British History, 6(3), 369–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macadam, E. (1934). The new philanthropy: A study of the relations between the statutory and voluntary social services. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBriar, A. (1987). An Edwardian mixed doubles: The Bosanquets versus the Webbs, a study in British social policy 1890–1929. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. (1977). Social work and social welfare: The organisation of philanthropic resources in Britain, 1900–1914. The Journal of British Studies, 16(2), 85–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Guilds of Help. (1913, June 5–7). Report of the sixth annual conference, Halifax, NAGH.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCSS. (1919, March). Memorandum. London: NCSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, G. (1995). The social impact. In S. Constantine, M. Kirby, & M. Rose (Eds.), The First World War in British history (pp. 106–140). London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, H. (1961). Frederic D’Aeth 1875–1940. Social Service Quarterly, 34(4), 156–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, R. (1991). War and society in Britain 1899–1948. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooff, M. (1972). A hundred years of family welfare: A study of the Family Welfare Association (formerly Charity Organisation Society), 1869–1969. London: Michael Joseph.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sephton, R. (2009). S.P. Grundy: A life of social service in Manchester and North Berkshire. Radley: Radley History Club.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simey, M. (2004). Frederic George D’Aeth. In Oxford dictionary of national biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simey, M. (2005). From rhetoric to reality: A study of the work of F.G. D’Aeth, social administrator (D. Bingham, Ed.). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, J. (1984). British society, 1914–1945. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thane, P. (2012). The “big society” and the “big state”: Creative tension or crowding out? Twentieth Century British History, 23(3), 408–429.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin Davis Smith .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Davis Smith, J. (2019). Setting Up. In: 100 Years of NCVO and Voluntary Action. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02774-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02774-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02773-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02774-2

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics