Individuals’ Variables in Cognitive Abilities Using a Narrative Serious Game
- 1.5k Downloads
Age, gender, and education represent crucial variables in the assessment and interpretation of traditional neuropsychological measures as regards the executive functions (EF). Currently, traditional measures are showing limitations in capturing real life behaviors and new technologies, such as serious games, are allowing creating more real situations with higher ecological validity. In the present study, we applied a serious game approach to investigate individual variables-related differences in the EF assessment. 268 healthy subjects participated in the study, completing 14 tasks (6 standard tasks; 8 serious games) randomly presented. The results showed that younger participants completed tasks in less time than older and with higher correct answers. Furthermore, males registered shorter reaction times, while females showed higher percentages of correct answers. The university studies group obtained higher total score and correct answers than high school studies group. Finally, since the study involved technology, we divided the group in high and low use technology level, obtaining that participants with a lower level of use technologies reported higher latency times and lower correct answers in high order EF tasks than the group with higher level of use of technology. As the traditional measure, these findings suggest that individuals’ differences are critical variables to consider in the development of more ecological measures for the assessment of EFs.
KeywordsSerious game Executive functions Age Education Gender Behavioral assessment Ecological validity
This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness funded project “Advanced Therapeutically Tools for Mental Health” (DPI2016-77396-R).
- 5.Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D.B., Loring, D.W., Fischer, J.S.: Neuropsychological Assessment. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)Google Scholar
- 9.Stricks, L., Pittman, J., Jacobs, D.M., Sano, M., Stern, Y.: Normative data for a brief neuropsychological battery administered to English-and Spanish-speaking community-dwelling elders. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 4(4), 311–318 (1998)Google Scholar
- 16.Das, S.K., Banerjee, T.K., Mukherjee, C.S., et al.: An urban community-based study of cognitive function among non-demented elderly population in India. Neurol. Asia 11, 37–48 (2006)Google Scholar
- 18.Liu, K.P., Kuo, M.C., Tang, K.C., et al.: Effects of age, education and gender in the Consortium to Establish a Registry for the Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD)-Neuropsychological assessment battery for Cantonese-speaking Chinese elders. Int. Psychogeriatr. 23(10), 1575–1581 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Zarghi, A., Zarindast, M.R.: Demographic variables and selective, sustained attention and planning through cognitive tasks among healthy adults. Basic Clin. Neurosci. 2(3), 58–67 (2011)Google Scholar
- 24.Bagherpoor, L.S.K., Akbar, A.: The influence of educational type (virtual and non-virtual) and gender on the executive functions (mental flexibility and selective attention) of students. Bull. Environ. Pharmacol. Life Sci. 2014(3), 360–367 (2014)Google Scholar
- 27.Burgess, P.W., Alderman, N., Volle, E., Benoit, R.G., Gilbert, S.J.: Mesulam’s frontal lobe mystery re-examined. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 27(5), 493–506 (2009)Google Scholar
- 33.Fleming, T.M., et al.: Serious games for the treatment or prevention of depression: a systematic review (2014)Google Scholar
- 35.Lang, P.J., Bradley, M.M., Cuthbert, B.N.: International affective picture system (IAPS): affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical report A-8. University of Florida, Gainesville (2008)Google Scholar
- 36.Fillmore, M.T., Rush, C.R., Hays, L.: Acute effects of cocaine in two models of inhibitory control: implications of non-linear dose effects. Addiction 101(132), 3–1332 (2006)Google Scholar
- 39.Culberston, W.C., Zillmer, E.A.: Tower of London-Drexel (TOLDX). Examiners’s Manual. Research Version. Multi-Health Systems Inc., Toronto (1999)Google Scholar