Advertisement

A Usability Framework for Diabetic Health Applications in South Africa

  • Bulelani Ngamntwini
  • Liezel CilliersEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 881)

Abstract

In South Africa, the percentage of the population diagnosed with diabetes is increasing each year. On the African continent, South Africa has been found to have one of the most significant diabetic communities. Numerous health applications are available to assist diabetic patients to monitor and manage their health, blood glucose, diet and physical activity. However, the uptake of these applications has not been as widespread as was expected due to usability issues, among other factors. The purpose of the study is to produce a framework that can be used to evaluate how usability will influence the intention to use health applications by diabetic patients in South Africa. The study made use of the qualitative research approach. The framework was developed making use of a literature review after which it was tested and refined through the evaluation of the seven most popular free diabetic applications on Google Play Store. The study found that health applications should be easy to learn, efficient to use, easy to remember, have few errors and be subjectively pleasing for patients. The study further recommends that software developers should take into consideration usability guidelines and evaluations as it improves effectiveness and efficiency of a diabetic health app.

Keywords

Diabetes Usability factors Application Diabetic application Nielsen heuristic usability principles 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research project was jointly funded by the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) and Forte, the Swedish Research Council for Welfare, Working Life and Welfare.

References

  1. 1.
    Adeniyi, O.V., Yogeswaran, P., Wright, G., Longo-Mbenza, B.: Diabetic patients’ perspectives on the challenges of glycaemic control. Health Care Fam. Med. 7(1), 1–8 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v7i1.767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang, J.: Supporting information needs of transitional phases in diabetes management through online health communities. In: Doctoral Colloquium, pp. 107–111 (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lustrek, M., Cvetkovic, B., Mirchevska, V., Kafali, O., Romero, A.E., Stathis, K.: Recognising lifestyle activities of diabetic patients with a smartphone. In: Proceedings of the 2015 9th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, PervasiveHealth 2015, pp. 317–324 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2015.259118
  4. 4.
    Ramakuela, N.J., Maputle, M.S., Khoza, L.B.: Health literacy for self-care among female patients diagnosed with diabetes in medical wards at a selected hospital in Limpopo Province, South Africa, pp. 423–438, December 2015Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huckvale, K., Car, M., Morrison, C., Car, J.: Apps for asthma self-management: a systematic assessment of content and tools. BMC Med. 10(144), 1741–7015 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marvicsin, D., Jennings, P., Ziegler-Bezaire, D.: What is new in diabetes technology? J. Nurse Pract. 13(3), 205–209 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2016.12.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zapata, B.C., Fernández-Alemán, L.J., Idri, A., Toval, A.: Empirical studies on usability of mHealth apps: a systematic literature review. J. Med. Syst. 39(1), 1–19 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-014-0182-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cui, M., Wu, X., Mao, J., Wang, X., Nie, M.: T2DM self-management via smartphone applications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 11(11), 1–16 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability engineering. New Dir. Youth Dev. 2012(136), 7–11 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.20038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jonassaint, C.R., Shah, N., Jonassaint, J., De Castro, L.: Usability and feasibility of an mHealth intervention for monitoring and managing pain symptoms in sickle cell disease: the sickle cell disease mobile application to record symptoms via technology (SMART). Hemoglobin 39(3), 162–168 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.3109/03630269.2015.1025141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hoi, R., Fung, Y., Chiu, D.K.W., Ko, E.H.T., Ho, K.K.W., Lo, P.: Heuristic usability evaluation of University of Hong Kong libraries’ mobile website. J. Acad. Libr. 42(5), 581–594 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.06.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Inostroza, R., Rusu, C., Roncagliolo, S., Jiménez, C., Rusu, V.: Usability heuristics for touchscreen-based mobile devices. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Technology, ITNG 2012, vol. 2241, pp. 662–667(2013).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ITNG.2012.134
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Hartz, J., Yingling, L., Powell-Wiley, T.M.: Use of mobile health technology in the prevention and management of diabetes mellitus. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 18(130), 1–11 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-016-0796-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim, H.-C.: Acceptability engineering: the study of user acceptance of innovative technologies. J. Appl. Res. Technol. 13(2), 230–237 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jart.2015.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hasan, L.A., Al-Sarayreh, K.T.: An integrated measurement model for evaluating usability attributes. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Inf. Process. Secur. Adv. Commun. 94(1–94), 6 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2816839.2816861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Harrison, R., Flood, D., Duce, D.: Usability of mobile applications: literature review and rationale for a new usability model. J. Interact. 1(1), 1–16 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hussain, A., Mkpojiogu, E.: An application of the ISO/IEC 25010 standard in the quality-in- use assessment of an online health awareness system Jurnal Teknologi. Jurnal Teknologi (Sci. Eng.) 77(5), 9–13 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6107
  19. 19.
    Thowfeek, M.H., Salam, M.N.A.: Students’ Assessment of the Usability of E-learning Websites. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 141(2014), 916–922 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bose, T.K.: Application of fibone analysis for evaluating supply chain and business process-a case study on the ST James hospital. Int. J. Manag. Value Supply Chains 3(2), 17–24 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.5121/ijmvsc.2012.3202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Thrower, S.L., Bingley, P.J.: What is type 1 diabetes? Medicine 42(12), 682–686 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpmed.2010.08.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mail & Guardian: Is South Africa the unequal society in the world? (2018). https://mg.co.za/article/2015-09-30-is-south-africa-the-most-unequal-society-in-the-world
  23. 23.
    ECSECC: Eastern Cape development indicators (2012). http://www.ecsecc.org/files/library/documents/EasternCape_withDMs. Accessed 20 Jan 2013

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information SystemsUniversity of Fort HareAliceSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations