Advertisement

SIMS: A Stakeholder Information Management System for Successful Projects

  • Belmir Patkovic
  • Kassem SalehEmail author
  • Paul Manuel
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 881)

Abstract

In recent years, there has been much attention given to stakeholder management. A clear indicator of its importance is that the Project Management Institute (PMI) has included a new knowledge area dedicated to project stakeholder management in the 5th edition of its Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK). The scarcity of stakeholder information management systems, the high price of the existing solutions and the absence of free or trial versions are all indicators that stakeholder management is still developing and rising. The purpose of this paper is to gather and analyze theoretical requirements for stakeholder management as described in various academic resources, use these requirements to design an information system using various techniques and diagrams, and finally develop a prototype following the proposed system design. In general, the biggest focus will be on creating a solid ground for a comprehensive stakeholder register as it plays a central role in stakeholder management processes. Through a literature review, it can be noticed that researchers gave much attention to the issue of categorization and prioritization of stakeholders through the assessment of their various attributes such as power, interest, legitimacy, etc. For that reason, one of the proposed system features is customizable scales that will satisfy all proposed attributes and enable their assessment. The ultimate goal of the research is to bridge the gap between the theoretical and practical side of stakeholder management by designing and developing a stakeholder information management system using the latest web technologies.

Keywords

Stakeholder categorization and prioritization Stakeholder management Stakeholder register 

References

  1. 1.
    Roeder, T.: Managing Project Stakeholders. Wiley, New Jersey (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bourne, L., Walker, D.H.: Visualising and mapping stakeholder influence. Manag. Decis. 43(5), 649–660 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McManus, J.: Managing Stakeholders in Software Development Projects. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Amsterdam (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Freeman, R.E.: Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston (1984)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., Wood, D.J.: Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad. Manag. Rev. 22(4), 853–886 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maj, J.: Diversity management’s stakeholders and stakeholders management. In: Proceeding of the 9th International Management Conference, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 780–793, November 2015Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ballejos, L.C., Montagna, J.M.: Method for stakeholder identification in interorganizational environments. Requir. Eng. 13, 281–297 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ballejos, L.C., Montagna, J.M.: Modeling stakeholders for information systems design processes. Requir. Eng. 16(4), 281–296 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bryson, J.M.: What to do when stakeholders matter. Public Manag. Rev. 6(1), 21–53 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Team FME: Project stakeholder management: project skills (2014). www.free-management-ebooks.com. Accessed 13 June 2017
  11. 11.
    Mojtahedi, M., Oo, B.L.: Critical attributes for proactive engagement of stakeholders in disaster risk management. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 21, 35–43 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ackermann, F., Eden, C.: Strategic management of stakeholders: theory and practice. Long Range Plan. 44, 179–196 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alexander, I.F.: A Taxonomy of stakeholders: human roles in system development. Int. J. Technol. Hum. Interact. 1(1), 23–59 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Butt, A., Naaranoja, M., Savolainen, J.: Project change stakeholder communication. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 34, 1579–1595 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Baugh, A.M.: Stakeholder Engagement: the Game Changer for Program Management. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miller, D., Oliver, M.: Engaging stakeholders for project success [White Paper]. (2015). http://www.gbd.dk/files/984_engagingstakeholders.pdf. Accessed 22 June 2017
  17. 17.
    Ponte, E.B., Carvajal-Trujillo, E., Escobar-Rodríguez, T.: Corporate Facebook and stakeholder engagement. Kybernotes 44(5), 771–787 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aaltonen, K.: Project stakeholder analysis as an environmental interpretation process. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 29(2), 165–183 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fink, K., Ploder, C., Roithmayr, F.: Multi-functional stakeholder information system for strategic knowledge management. Theoretical Concept and Case Studies. In: Emerging Trends and Challenges in Information Technology Management, vol. 1–2, pp. 152–155. Hershey, Pa., Idea Group Inc., (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mishra, A., Mishra, D.: Applications of stakeholder theory in information systems and technology. Eng. Econ. 24(3), 254–266 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Greger, V., Balta, D., Wolf, P., Krcmar, H.: Analyzing stakeholders in complex E-government projects: towards a stakeholder interaction model. In: 13th International Conference on Electronic Government (EGOV), September 2014, Dublin, Ireland. Springer, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, LNCS, vol. 8653, pp. 194–205 (2014). Electronic GovernmentGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sharp, H., Finkelstein, A., Galal, G.: Stakeholder identification in the requirements engineering process. In: Proceedings of Tenth International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, DEXA 1999, pp. 387–391 (1999)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Polonsky, M.J.: Incorporating the natural environment in corporate strategy: a stakeholder approach. J. Bus. Strat. 12(2), 151–168 (1995)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mainardes, E.W., Alves, H., Raposo, M.: A model for stakeholder classification and stakeholder relationships. Manag. Decis. 50(10), 1861–1879 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Clarkson, M.: A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20(1), 92–117 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rizzo, E., et al.: Brownfield regeneration in Europe: Identifying stakeholder perceptions, concerns, attitudes and information needs. Land Use Policy 48, 437–453 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hutt, R.W.: The extent and patterns of multi-stakeholder communications in annual report letters. Corp. Commun. 17(3), 323–335 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bailur, S.: Using stakeholder theory to analyze telecenter projects. Inf. Technol. Int. Dev. 3(3), 61–80 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Project Management Institute: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide). Project Management Institute Inc, Newtown Square, PA (2013)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Savage, G.T., Nix, T.W., Whitehead, C.J., Blair, J.D.: Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Acad. Manag. Exec. 5(2), 61–75 (1991)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Scholes, E., Clutterbuck, D.: Communication with stakeholders: an integrated approach. Long Range Plan. 31(2), 227–238 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Date, C.J.: SQL and Relational Theory: How to Write Accurate SQL Code, 2nd edn. O’Reilly Media Inc., Sebastopol (2012)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kroenke, D.M., Auer, D.J.: Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design, and Implementation, 14th edn. Pearson, Boston (2016)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wroblewski, L.: International Address Fields in Web Forms, 9 June 2008. http://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2008/06/international-address-fields-in-web-forms.php. Accessed 09 July 2017
  35. 35.
    Fryer, A.: SQL Server 2008 Spatial Data Types, 26 November 2007. https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/andrew/2007/11/26/sql-server-2008-spatial-data-types/. Accessed 10 July 2017
  36. 36.
    Satzinger, J.W., Jackson, R.B., Burd, S.D.: System Analysis and Design in a Changing World. Course Technology, Boston (2012)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I., Booch, G.: The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2005)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Spatial Types – geography (2017). https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/t-sql/spatial-geography/spatial-types-geography. Accessed 14 Oct 2017
  39. 39.
    Vega, D.: Entity framework core roadmap. https://github.com/aspnet/EntityFrameworkCore/wiki/Roadmap. Accessed 14 Oct 2017
  40. 40.
    Zhang, S.: How precise is one degree of longitude or latitude?. (2014). https://gizmodo.com/how-precise-is-one-degree-of-longitude-or-latitude-1631241162. Accessed 14 Oct 2017
  41. 41.
    Yang, J.R., Shen, G.Q., Bourne, L., Ho, C., Xue, X.: A typology of operational approaches for stakeholder analysis and engagement: findings from Hong Kong and Australia. Constr. Manag. Econ. 29(2), 145–162 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chung, W.H., Chen, H., Reid, E.E.: Business stakeholder analyzer: an experiment of classifying stakeholders on the web. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 60(1), 59–74 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Enders, J.: The name riddle. https://www.formulate.com.au/blog/the-name-riddle/. Accessed 9 Oct 2017
  44. 44.
    Pouloudi, N., Currie, W., Whitley, E.A.: Entangled stakeholder roles and perceptions in health information systems: a longitudinal study of the U.K. NHS N3 Network. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 17(2), 107–161 (2016)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Eden, E., Ackerman, F.: Marking Strategy: The Journal of Strategic Management. SAGE Publications Ltd., London (1998)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information SciencesKuwait UniversityKuwait CityKuwait

Personalised recommendations