Advertisement

Method of Innovation Assessment of Products and Processes in the Initial Design Phase

  • Bartosz Pryda
  • Marek MysiorEmail author
  • Sebastian Koziołek
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 541)

Abstract

A key for economic success of an enterprise is proper decision making regarding product and process planning. The aim of this study was to develop a method of innovation assessment of products and processes that will be applicable at early stage of design and throughout life cycle of a product. The effectiveness of proposed method was examined on real-life case studies. The method is based on systematic, quantitative analysis of parameters, unlike current approaches that concentrate rather on subjective opinions or assessment of the design process, not the design itself. Proposed method comprises some already known tools regarding functional modelling including TRIZ and adopts them to innovation assessment environment. Innovation assessment using proposed method allows to facilitate decision making process regarding choice of concept to be further developed at an early stage of a design process, reducing cost and time of development of new products and processes.

References

  1. 1.
    Zlotin, B., Zusman, A.: Directed Evolution: Philosophy, Theory and Practice. Ideation International Inc. (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gadd, K.: TRIZ for Engineers: Enabling Inventive Problem Solving. Wiley, Hoboken (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rantanen, K., Domb, E.: Simplified TRIZ. New Problem-Solving Applications for Engineers and Manufacturing Professionals. Taylor & Francis (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arafat, G.H., Goodman, B., Arciszewski, T.: RAMZES: a knowledge-based system for structural concepts evaluation. Comput. Syst. Eng. 4(2–3), 211–221 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shelton, K.A., Arciszewski, T.: Formal innovation criteria. Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol. 30(1/2), 21 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oman, S.K., Tumer, I.Y., Wood, K., Seepersad, C.: A comparison of creativity and innovation metrics and sample validation through in-class design projects. Res. Eng. Des. 24, 65–92 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zakrzewska-Bielawska, A.: Ocena innowacyjności małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw sektora ICT. In: Wyzywania rozwojowe małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw. Difin, Warszawa, pp. 37–53 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaczmarska, B.: Ocena poziomu innowacyjnosci przedsiebiorstw na podstawie zasobów internetowych. In: Knosali, R. (ed.) Innowacje w zarzadzaniu i inzynierii produkcji, pp. 112–123. Oficyna Wydawnicza Polskiego Towarzystwa Zarzadzania Produkcja, Opole (2013). ISBN 978-83-930399-5-1Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sitkowska, R.: Wielowymiarowa ocena potencjału innowacyjnego wytypowanych działów przetwórstwa przemysłowego, vol. 2/2011, no. 2, pp. 215–231 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saunders, M.N., Seepersad, C.C., Holtta-Otto, K.: The characteristics of innovative, mechanical products. In: ASME IDETC Design Theory and Methodology Conference, no. 512, pp. 1–38 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boratyńska-Sala, A.: Współczesny TRIZ- analiza funkcjonalna i trimming. In: Konferencja Innowacje w Zarządzaniu i Inżynierii Produkcji, pp. 26–37 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koziołek, S.: Design by analogy: synectics and knowledge acquisition network. In: Rusiński, E., Pietrusiak, D. (eds.) RESRB 2016. LNME, pp. 259–273. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50938-9_27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F., Tsuji, S.: Attractive quality and must-be quality. J. Jpn. Soc. Qual. Control 14(2), 39–48 (1984)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arciszewski, T.: Successful Education. How to Educate Creative Engineers. Successful Education LLC (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bartosz Pryda
    • 1
  • Marek Mysior
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sebastian Koziołek
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Machine Design and ResearchWroclaw University of Science and TechnologyWroclawPoland

Personalised recommendations