Advertisement

Towards a Conceptual Design and Semantic Modeling Approach for Innovative Modular Products

  • Chérif Ahmed Tidiane AidaraEmail author
  • Bala Moussa Biaye
  • Serigne Diagne
  • Khalifa Gaye
  • Amadou Coulibaly
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 541)

Abstract

To meet a demand more and more personalized for different users, the products must be innovative but also reliable, modular with good maintainability. Considering all these requirements in the design and modeling process would facilitate an evaluation of the behavioral performance of the future product. Most works deal with aspects related to functional criteria whereas behavior is rarely taken into account in the search for solutions. In this paper, we propose a design approach for innovative modular products, easily maintainable and adaptable to different user profiles. In order to evaluate the modularity, we propose a method of semantic modeling. The semantic model obtained makes it possible to identify innovative modular solution concepts by solving technical contradictions taking into account both the functional characteristics and the behavioral performances. As an illustration, a case study is outlined.

Keywords

Inventive design Conceptual design Semantic modeling Modularity Innovation 

References

  1. 1.
    Zanni-Merk, C., Cavallucci, D., Rousselot, F.: An ontological basis pour computer aided innovation. Comput. Ind. 60, 563–574 (2009). www.elsevier.com/locate/compindCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rousselot, F., Zanni-Merk, C., Cavallucci, D.: Towards a formal definition of contradiction in inventive design. Comput. Ind. 63, 231–242 (2012). www.elsevier.com/locate/compindCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sheu, D., Hou, C.T.: TRIZ-based trimming for process-machine improvements: slit-valve innovative redesign. Comput. Ind. Eng. 66, 555–566 (2013). www.elsevier.com/locate/caieCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang, K., Nickerson, J.V.: A literature review on individual creativity support systems. Comput. Hum. Behav. 74, 139–151 (2017). www.elsevier.com/locate/comphumbehCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Menye, John the Baptist: Validation of maintainability and design availability of a multi-component system. Laval University (2009). http://www.exercicescorriges.com/i_107544.pdf
  6. 6.
    Diagne, S., Coulibaly, A., De Beuvron, F.: Towards a conceptual design for mechatronic product’s family development, pp. 94–99. IEEE (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1109/idam.2014.6912677
  7. 7.
    Casner, D., Houssin, R., Knittel, D., Renaud, J.: An approach to design and optimization of mechatronic systems based on multidisciplinary optimization and based on the feedback of experiences. In: 21st French Mechanics Congress, 26–30 August 2013, Bordeaux, France (FR) (2013). http://documents.irevues.inist.fr/handle/2042/52520
  8. 8.
    Casner, D., Renaud, J., Knittel, D.: Design of mechatronic systems by topological optimization. In: 12th AIP-PRIMECA National Conference, AIP-Priméca (2011). https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00843025/
  9. 9.
    Coulibaly, A., De Beuvron, F.D.B., Renaud, J.: Maintainability assessment at early design internship using advanced CAD systems. In: Proceedings of IDMME-Virtual Concept, pp. 20–22 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Motte, D.: A review of fundamentals of systematic engineering design process models. In: International Design Conference - Design 2008, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 19–22 May 2008Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gausemeier, J., Mohringer, S.: Nes guideline VDI 2206 - a flexible procedure method for the design of mechatronic systems. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 2003), Stockholm (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ziemniak, P., Stania, M., Stetter, R.: Mechatronics engineering on the example of an innovative production vehicle. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference of Engineering Design (ICED 2009), 24–27 August 2009. Stanford University, Stanford (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rahman, R., Pulm, U., Stetter, R.: Systematic mechatronic design of a piezo-electric brake. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference of Engineering (ICED 2007), 28–31 August 2007. Design Society, Paris (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Partto, M., Saariluoma, P.: Explaining failures in innovative throught processes in engineering design. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 41, 442–449 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chandrasegaran, S.K., et al.: The evolution challenges and future knowledge representation in product design systems. Comput.-Aided Des. 45(2), 204–228 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Diagne, S., et al.: Towards a conceptual design for mechatronic products family development. In: 2014 International Conference on Innovative Design and Manufacturing, 13–15 August 2014, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Diagne, S.: Conceptual semantic modeling for the behavioral performance engineering of complex products. University of Strasbourg, Graduate School of Mathematics Information and Engineering Sciences (MSII ED 269) UdS INSA Strasbourg Laboratory of Engineering Conception (LGeCo EA 3938). Doctor from the University of Strasbourg Discipline Engineering Sciences Specialty Computer Engineering Mechanical Engineering, July 2015Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baldwin, C., Clark, K.: Modularity in the design of complex engineering systems. In: Braha, D., Minai, A.A., Bar-Yam, Y. (eds.) Complex Engineered Systems, Science Meets Technology, pp. 175–205. Springer, Berlin (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32834-3_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Homam_ISSA thesis dissertation: Contributions to the design of configurable products in advanced CAD systems, December 2015Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Boothroyd, G., Dewhurst, P., Knight, W.: Product Design for Manufacture and Assembly. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York City (1994). ISBN 10: 0824791762, ISBN 13: 9780824791766Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chérif Ahmed Tidiane Aidara
    • 1
    Email author
  • Bala Moussa Biaye
    • 1
  • Serigne Diagne
    • 1
  • Khalifa Gaye
    • 1
  • Amadou Coulibaly
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratory of Computer Science and Engineering for Innovation (LI3)Assane Seck University of ZiguinchorZiguinchorSénégal
  2. 2.Laboratory of Sciences of the EngineerComputer Science and Imaging (Icube – UMR 7357), National Institute of Applied Sciences of Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, CNRSStrasbourgFrance

Personalised recommendations