Skip to main content

Using the Multi-stakeholder Approach to Match Potential Innovations with Challenges Experienced by European Sheep and Goat Farms

  • 479 Accesses

Part of the Springer Earth System Sciences book series (SPRINGEREARTH)

Abstract

The decline in European sheep and goat farmers is a complicated agricultural challenge that requires solutions and innovation to reverse. The complexity of this challenge means that a multi-stakeholder approach is required to understand how to prioritise each component of the challenge and find appropriate solutions. The multi-stakeholder approach used in this research included semi-structured interviews with 47 sheep and goat farmers. Additionally, a survey and 3 workshop discussions were done with stakeholders from 28 research and industry organisations.

All stakeholders agreed that improvement of the market for sheep and goat products was the most important priority. Industry representatives and researchers, however, suggested breeding programmes and availability of labour as important, whilst farmers suggested cost of production, solutions for predators and animal health were more important. Additionally, innovations that industry representatives believe should be tested are for breeding, collection of farm data and reproduction despite marketing and processing being the main priority. This mismatch is probably because these stakeholders do not have the capacity to test innovation or solutions related to marketing and processing of products.

The multi-stakeholder approach was effective at identifying key priorities and potential solutions that can be used to make sheep and goat farms more sustainable. More solutions related to product marketing and processing could have been identified if the research included stakeholders specialising in these areas.

Keywords

  • Multi-stakeholder
  • Sheep
  • Goats
  • Interviews
  • Workshops
  • Innovation

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-02312-6_7
  • Chapter length: 12 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-02312-6
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

References

  • Beintema N, Stads GJ, Fuglie K, Heisey P (2012) ASTI global assessment of agricultural R&D spending. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC, Agricultural Science and Technology Indicators, Rome, Italy and the Global Forum on Agricultural Research, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubeuf JP (2011) The social and environmental challenges faced by goat and small livestock local activities: Present contribution of research–development and stakes for the future. Small Rumin Res 98(1):3–8

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dubeuf JP, Sayadi S (2014) Multi-functionality issues for small ruminants: What changes are needed in territorial public policies and training?: Report of two round tables on territorial issues and training for the development of goat farming. Small Rumin Res 121(1):136–145

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Faysse N (2006) Troubles on the way: an analysis of the challenges faced by multi-stakeholder platforms. Nat Res Forum 30:219–229

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25:739–755

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Giller KE, Tittonell P, Rufino MC, van Wijk MT, Zingore S, Mapfumo P, Adjei-Nsiah S, Herrero M, Chikowo R, Corbeels M, Rowe EC, Baijukya F, Mwijage A, Smith J, Yeboah E, van der Burg WJ, Sanogo OM, Misiko M, de Ridder N, Karanja S, Kaizzi C, K’ungu J, Mwale M, Nwaga D, Pacini C, Vanlauwe B (2011) Communicating complexity: integrated assessment of trade-offs concerning soil fertility management within African farming systems to support innovation and development. Agric Syst 104:191–203

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin G (1968) The Tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • International Institute for Sustainable Development (2014) Rapid Rural Appraisal (RRA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwis C (2000) Reconceptualizing participation for sustainable rural development: towards a negotiation approach. Dev Chang 31:931–959

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McNie EC (2007) Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environ Sci Policy 10:17–38

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Qualtrics (2016) Version 3. Copyright © 2017 Qualtrics. Qualtrics and all other qualtrics product or service names are registered trademarks or trademarks of Qualtrics, Provo, UT, USA. http://www.qualtrics.com

  • Schut M, van Paassen A, Leeuwis C, Klerkx L (2014) Towards dynamic research configurations: a framework for reflection on the contribution of research to policy and innovation processes. Sci Public Policy 41:207–218

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schut M, Klerkx L, Rodenburg J, Kayeke J, Hinnou LC, Raboanarielina CM, Adegbola PY, van Ast A, Bastiaans L (2015) RAAIS: Rapid Appraisal of Agricultural Innovation Systems (Part I). A diagnostic tool for integrated analysis of complex problems and innovation capacity. Agric Syst 132:1–11

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Spielman DJ (2005) Innovation systems perspectives on developing-country agriculture: a critical review, ISNAR Discussion Paper 2. IFPRI, Washington, p 58

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunding D, Zilberman D (2001) The agricultural innovation process: research and technology adoption in a changing agricultural sector. Handb Agric Econ 1:207–261

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is part of the iSAGE Project (http://www.isage.eu/), with financial support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 679302. We also thank Professor Raffaele Zanoli for providing access to the Qualtrics survey platform (Qualtrics 2016), which was used for the development of the on-live survey used in this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Rose .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rose, I. et al. (2019). Using the Multi-stakeholder Approach to Match Potential Innovations with Challenges Experienced by European Sheep and Goat Farms. In: Theodoridis, A., Ragkos, A., Salampasis, M. (eds) Innovative Approaches and Applications for Sustainable Rural Development. HAICTA 2017. Springer Earth System Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02312-6_7

Download citation