Shared Autonomous Electrical Vehicles and Urban Mobility: A Vision for Rome in 2035

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 879)


This paper deals with a first attempt to evaluate the technical and economic feasibility of a sharing mobility scenario for the central area of Rome in the year 2035. The main aspects of the proposed scenario focus on the use of electric automated vehicles, on car sharing, on limitations of the use of private cars and on road pricing in the central area of the city. The results indicate a technical and financial feasibility of the scenario.


Automated vehicle Sharing mobility Travel demand management Electric vehicles 


  1. 1.
    Alessandrini, A., Campagna, A., Site, P.D., Filippi, F., Persia, L.: Automated vehicles and the rethinking of mobility and cities. Transp. Res. Procedia 5, 145–160 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Michałowska, M., Ogłoziński, M.: Autonomous vehicles and road safety. In: Mikulski, J. (ed.) Smart Solutions in Today’s Transport, pp. 191–202. Springer (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fagnant, D.J., Kockelman, K.M.: The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 40, 1–13 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wadud, Z., MacKenzie, D., Leiby, P.: Help or hindrance? The travel, energy and carbon impacts of highly automated vehicles. Transp. Res. Part A Policy and Pract. 86, 1–18 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    van den Berg, V.A.C., Verhoef, E.: T: Autonomous cars and dynamic bottleneck congestion: the effects on capacity, value of time and preference heterogeneity. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 94, 43–60 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Levin, M.W., Boyles, S.D.: A multiclass cell transmission model for shared human and autonomous vehicle roads. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 62, 103–116 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meyer, J., Becker, H., Bosch, P.M., Axhausen, K.W.: Autonomous vehicles: the next jump in accessibilities? Res. Transp. Econ. 62, 80–91 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harper, C.D., Hendrickson, C.T., Mangones, S., Samaras, C.: Estimating potential increases in travel with autonomous vehicles for the non-driving, elderly and people with travel-restrictive medical conditions. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 72, 1–9 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fagnant, D.J., Kockelman, K.: Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 77, 167–181 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martinez, L.M., et al.: How shared self-driving cars could change city traffic. International Transport Forum at the OECD (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heilig, M. et al.: Potentials of autonomous vehicles in a changing private transportation system-a case study in the Stuttgart region. Institute for Transport Studies, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boesch, P.M., Ciari, F., Axhausen, K.: Required autonomous vehicle fleet sizes to serve different levels of demand. IVT, ETH Zurich (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lang, N., Rüßmann, M., Chua, J., Doubara, X.: Making Autonomous Vehicles a Reality: Lessons from Boston and Beyond. Boston Consulting Group (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Citymobil2 website. http://Www.Citymobil2.Eu/En/. Accessed 05 Feb 2018
  15. 15.
    Chen, D., Ahn, S., Chitturi, M., Noyce, D.A.: Towards vehicle automation: roadway capacity formulation for traffic mixed with regular and automated vehicles. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 100, 196–221 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen, Z., He, F., Zhang, L., Yin, Y.: Optimal deployment of autonomous vehicle lanes with endogenous market penetration. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 72, 143–156 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ma, J., Li, X., Zhou, F., Hao, W.: Designing optimal autonomous vehicle sharing and reservation systems: a linear programming approach. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 84, 124–141 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang, W., Guhathakurta, S., Fang, J., Zhang, G.: Exploring the impact of shared autonomous vehicles on urban parking demand: an agent-based simulation approach. Sustain. Cities Soc. 19, 34–45 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chen, T.D., Kockelman, K.M., Hanna, J.P.: Operations of a shared, autonomous, electric vehicle fleet: Implications of vehicle & charging infrastructure decisions. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 94, 243–254 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Micari, S., Polimeni, A., Napoli, G., Andaloro, L., Antonucci, V.: Electric vehicle charging infrastructure planning in a road network. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 80, 98–108 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hulse, L.M., Xie, H., Galea, E.R.: Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: relationships with road users, risk, gender and age. Saf. Sci. 102, 1–13 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Krueger, R., Rashidi, T.H., Rose, J.M.: Preferences for shared autonomous vehicles. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 69, 343–355 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Haboucha, C.J., Ishaq, R., Shiftan, Y.: User preferences regarding autonomous vehicles. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 78, 37–49 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Coppola, P., Nuzzolo, A.: Changing accessibility, dwelling price and the spatial distribution of socio-economic activities. Res. Transp. Econ. 31, 63–71 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Coppola, P., Papa, E., Angiello, G., Carpentieri, G.: Urban form and sustainability: the case study of Rome. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 160, 557–566 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Giustiniani, G., Site, P.D., Persia, L.: Demand elasticity to road charges in Rome Historical Centre. Transp. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 54, 1317–1329 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gentile, G., Papola, N., Persia, L.: Advanced pricing and rationing policies for large scale multimodal networks. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 39(7), 612–631 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tripodi, A., Persia, L.: Impact of bike sharing system in an urban area. Adv. Transp. Stud. 36, 143–156 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Enterprise EngineeringUniversity of Rome Tor VergataRomeItaly
  2. 2.Centro di ricerca per il Trasporto e la LogisticaSapienza University of RomeRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations