Finding a Spherology of Feminisms for Designing Media

  • Amanda WindleEmail author


In this chapter, I introduce a strategy for working both with and against Peter Sloterdijk’s Spheres trilogy ([1998–2004] 2011–2016). The spatial questions of Spheres are related to being-in the depressive sphere, which is better known temporally as the Anthropogenic epoch. This book brings new practice-based contributions to reading Spheres by providing design-ins (or entry-points) which act as wayfaring for design readers. By reconfiguring the feminist writers that are referenced in Spheres, I put forward a renewed strategy—that is, a spherology of feminisms. With new approaches to Spheres through embodied situations, methods and technological problems, this companion is relevant to the spatio-temporal aspects of design in general like studio practice, design layout or digital interaction.


Being-in Design-in Feminisms Spherology Technoscience 


  1. Akrich, Madeleine, Michel Callon, and Bruno Latour. “The Key to Success in Innovation Part I and II: The Art of Interessement.” International Journal of Innovation Management 6, no. 2 (2002): 187–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barad, Karen. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28, no. 3 (2003): 801–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bronkhurst, Judith. “1895: The Beggarstaffs’ ‘Annus Mirabilis’.” The Journal of the Decorative Arts Society 1890–1940, no. 2 (1978): 3–13.Google Scholar
  4. Cixous, Hélène. “The Laugh of the Medusa.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 1, no. 4 (1976): 875–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Couture, Jean-Pierre. Sloterdijk. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2016.Google Scholar
  6. Dobrowolny, Wolfgang. Ashram in Poona: Bhagwan’s Experiment. New York City: DRB, [1979] 1981.Google Scholar
  7. Dunne, Anthony. Hertzian Tales: An Investigation into the Critical and Aesthetic Potential of the Electronic Product as a Post-optimal Object. London: Royal College of Art, 1997.Google Scholar
  8. Dunne, Anthony, and Fiona Raby. Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects. Basel: August/Birkhäuser, 2001.Google Scholar
  9. Elden, Stuart. Sloterdijk Now. Edited by Stuart Elden, 1–17. Cambridge: Polity, 2012.Google Scholar
  10. Haraway, Donna. Staying with the Trouble. Durham: Duke University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
  11. Hexham, Irving, and Karla O. Poewe. Understanding Cults and New Religions. Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1986.Google Scholar
  12. hooks, bell. Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. Cambridge, MA: South End Press, [1984] 2000.Google Scholar
  13. Jain, Sarah S. Lochlann. Malignant: How Cancer Becomes Us. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  14. Kember, Sarah. Imedia: The Gendering of Objects, Environments and Smart Materials. London: Palgrave Macmillan Pivot, 2015.Google Scholar
  15. Koskinen, Ilpo, John Zimmerman, Thomas Binder, Johan Redström, and Stephan Wensveen. Design Research Through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann (Elsevier), 2011. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Latour, Bruno. Science in Action. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  17. Latour, Bruno, Pablo Jensen, Tommaso Venturini, Sébastian Grauwin, and Dominique Boullier. “The Whole Is Always Smaller Than Its Parts—A Digital Test of Gabriel Tardes’ Monads.” The British Journal of Sociology 63, no. 4 (2012): 590–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Linton, S. Claiming Disability: Knowledge and Identity. New York: New York University Press, 203, 1998.Google Scholar
  19. Malpass, Matt. Critical Design in Context: History, Theory, and Practices. London: Bloomsbury, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Musil, Robert. The Man Without Qualities. Edited by Burton Pike with Sophie Wilkins. London: Picador, 1966.Google Scholar
  21. Oliveira, Carlos, Peter Sloterdijk, and Carl Hanser. Selbstversuch: Ein Gespräch Mit Carlos Oliveira. München: Verlag, 1996.Google Scholar
  22. Orr, Jackie. Panic Diaries: Genealogy of Panic Disorder. Durham: Duke University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Poewe, Karla O. My Apprenticeship: An Intellectual Journey. Calgary: Vogelstein Press, 2018.Google Scholar
  24. Raby, Fiona. “Interview.” In Darkitecture: Learning Architecture for the Twenty-First Century, edited by Gerrard O’Carroll, 84–87. London: Two Little Boys, 2012.Google Scholar
  25. Rajneesh, Bhagwan Shree. Chapter Two: The Greatest Discovery There Is. Osho Online Library. Accessed January 23, 2018.
  26. Roberts, Celia. Messengers of Sex: Hormones, Biomedicine and Feminism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  27. Rosner, Daniela. Critical Fabulation: Reworking the Methods and Margins of Design. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2018.Google Scholar
  28. Schön, Donald A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books, 1983.Google Scholar
  29. Sloterdijk, Peter. Spheres, Bubbles: Microspherology. Translated by Wieland Hoban. Vol. I. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e), 1998.Google Scholar
  30. ———. Spheres, Globes: Macrospherology. Translated by Wieland Hoban. Vol. II, Los Angeles: Semiotext(e), 1999.Google Scholar
  31. ——— Spheres, Foams: Plural Spherology. Translated by Wieland Hoban. Vol. III, Los Angeles: Semiotext(e), 2004.Google Scholar
  32. Sloterdijk, Peter, and Gesa Mueller von der Haegen. “Instant Democracy: The Pneumatic Parliament(R).” In Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy, edited by Bruno Latour and Peter Weibel, 952–58. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  33. Stein, Gertrude. The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas. London: Penguin Modern Classics, [1933] 2001. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.London College of CommunicationUniversity of the Arts LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations