Alexander L (2012) Legal objectivity and the illusion of legal principles. In: Klatt M (ed) Institutionalized reason: the jurisprudence of Robert Alexy. Oxford University Press, Rochester, NY. Accessed from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1236222
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Alexander L, Kress K (1996) Against legal principles. Iowa Law Rev 82:739
Google Scholar
Alexy R (1979) Zum Begriff des Rechtsprinzips. In: Krawietz W, Opalek K, Peczenik A, Schramm A (eds) Argumentation und Hermeneutik in der Jurisprudenz. Duncker und Humblot, Berlin, pp 59–87
Google Scholar
Alexy R (1991) Statutory interpretation in the Federal Republic of Germany. In: MacCormick N, Summers RS (eds) Interpreting statutes: a comparative study. Aldershot, Hants, England; Dartmouth, Brookfield, Vt., USA, pp 73–121
Google Scholar
Alexy R (1992) Rights, legal reasoning and rational discourse. Ratio Juris 5(2):143–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.1992.tb00121.x
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Alexy R (1993a) Justification and application of norms. Ratio Juris 6(2):157–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.1993.tb00144.x
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Alexy R (1993b) Teoría de los Derechos Fundamentales (E. G. Valdés, Trans.). Centro de Estudios Constitutionales, Madrid
Google Scholar
Alexy R (1995) Die logische Analyse juristischer Entscheidungen. In: Recht, Vernunft, Diskurs: Studien zur Rechtsphilosophie, 1st Aufl. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, pp 181–212
Google Scholar
Alexy R (1999) Colisão de Direitos Fundamentais e Realização de Direitos Fundamentais no Estado de Direito Democrático. Revista de Direito Administrativo 217:67–80
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Alexy R (2000a) On the structure of legal principles. Ratio Juris 13(3):294–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9337.00157
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Alexy R (2000b) Vícios no Exercício do Poder Discricionário. Revista Dos Tribunais 779:11–46
Google Scholar
Alexy R (2001) A defence of Radbruch’s formula. In: Freeman MDA (ed) Lloyd’s introduction to jurisprudence, 7th edn. Sweet & Maxwell, London, pp 374–391
Google Scholar
Alexy R (2002) Teoría de los Derechos Fundamentales (E. G. Valdés, Trans.). Centro de Estudios Constitutionales, Madrid
Google Scholar
Alexy R (2003) Constitutional rights, balancing, and rationality. Ratio Juris 16(2):131–140
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Alexy R (2008) Teoria dos Direitos Fundamentais (VA da Silva, Trans.). Malheiros Editores, São Paulo
Google Scholar
Alexy R (2010a) A theory of constitutional rights (J. Rivers, Trans.). Oxford University Press, Oxford
Google Scholar
Alexy R (2010b) The construction of constitutional rights. Law Ethics Human Rights 4(1):21–32
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Alexy R (2010c) The argument from injustice: a reply to legal positivism (Paulson SL, Paulson BL, Trans.). Oxford University Press, New York
Google Scholar
Alexy R (2010d) The dual nature of law. Ratio Juris 23(2):167–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2010.00449.x
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Alexy R (2010e) Two or three? In: Borowski M (ed) On the nature of legal principles: proceedings of the special workshop ‘The Principles Theory’ held at the 23rd world congress of the international association for philosophy of law and social philosophy (IVR), Kraków, 2007. Franz Steiner Verlag, Nomos, Stuttgart, pp 9–18
Google Scholar
Alexy R (2012) Comments and responses. In: Klatt M (ed) Institutionalized reason: the jurisprudence of Robert Alexy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Alexy R (2014a) Formal principles: some replies to critics. Int J Const Law 12(3):511–524. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mou051
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Alexy R (2014b) Princípios Formais. In: Trivisonno ATG, Saliba AT, Lopes MS (eds) Princípios formais e outros aspectos da teoria discursiva do Direito. Forense Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, pp 13–28. Accessed from http://www.grupogen.com.br/juridica-concursos/principios-formais-e-outros-aspectos-da-teoria-discursiva-do-direito.html
Alexy R (ed) (n.d.) Idee und Struktur eines vernünftigen Rechtssystems. In: Rechtssystem und praktische Vernunft: in Göttingen, August 1991 = Legal system and practical reason, pp 30–44
Google Scholar
Alexy R, Peczenik A (1990) The concept of coherence and its significance for discursive rationality. Ratio Juris 3(S1):130–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.1990.tb00076.x
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Allan TRS (2012) Constitutional rights and the rule of law. In: Klatt M (ed) Institutionalized reason: the jurisprudence of Robert Alexy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Ávila HB (2012) Teoria dos princípios: da definição à aplicação dos princípios jurídicos, 13th edn. Malheiros Editores, São Paulo
Google Scholar
Badenhop J (2010) Normtheoretische Grundlagen der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention. Nomos, Baden-Baden
CrossRef
Google Scholar
de Barros ST (1996) O princípio da proporcionalidade e o controle de constitucionalidade das leis restrictivas de direitos fundamentales. Brasília Jurídica
Google Scholar
Barroso LR (2006) Fundamentos teóricos e filosóficos do novo direito constitucional brasileiro (pós-modernidade, teoria crítica e pós-positivismo). In: Barroso LR (ed) A nova interpretação constitucional: ponderação, direitos fundamentais e relações privadas. Renovar, Rio de Janeiro, pp 1–48
Google Scholar
Beatty DM (2004) The ultimate rule of law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Bobbio N (1957) Principi generali di diritto. In Novissio digesto italiano, vol 13. Turim
Google Scholar
Bobbio N (1960) Teoria dell’ordinamento giuridico. G. Giappichelli, Torino
Google Scholar
Bobbio N (2011) Giusnaturalismo e positivismo giuridico. Laterza, Roma, Bari
Google Scholar
Bonavides P (2008) Curso de direito constitucional: (em apêndice texto da constituição federal de 1988, com as emendas constitucionais até a de n. 56, de 20.12.2007), 23rd edn. Malheiros, São Paulo, SP
Google Scholar
Borowski M (1998) Grundrechte als Prinzipien: die Unterscheidung von Prima-facie-Position und definitiver Position als fundamentaler Konstruktionsgrundsatz der Grundrechte, 1st edn. Nomos Verl.-Ges, Baden-Baden
Google Scholar
Borowski M (2010) The Structure of Formal Principles-Robert Alexy’s ‘Law of Combination’. In: Borowski M (ed) On the nature of legal principles: proceedings of the special workshop ‘The Principles Theory’ held at the 23rd world congress of the international association for philosophy of law and social philosophy (IVR), Kraków, 2007. Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 19–35
Google Scholar
Borowski M (2013) Formelle Prinzipien und Gewichtsformel. In: Klatt M (ed) Prinzipientheorie und Theorie der Abwägung. Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck
Google Scholar
Canaris C-W (1969) Systemdenken und Systembegriff in der Jurisprudenz: entwickelt am Beispiel des deutschen Privatrechts. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin. Accessed from https://kataloge.uni-hamburg.de/DB=1/SET=6/TTL=71/SHW?FRST=77
Castañeda CE, Webb KE (2018, January 17) Sao Francisco River (river, Brazil). In: Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica, inc. Accessed from https://www.britannica.com/place/Sao-Francisco-River
Castro CRS (2003) A constituição aberta e os direitos fundamentais: ensaios sobre o constitucionalismo pós-moderno e comunitário. Editora Forense
Google Scholar
Cittadino GG (2009) Pluralismo, direito e justiça distributiva: elementos da filosofia constitucional contemporânea. Editora Lumen Juris, Rio de Janeiro
Google Scholar
Cornell D, Friedman N (2010) The significance on Dworkin’s non-positivist jurisprudence for law in the post-colony. Malawi LJ 4:1
Google Scholar
Del Vècchio G (1958) Sui principi generali del diritto. In: Studi sul diritto, vol I. Milano
Google Scholar
Dworkin R (1967) The model of rules. Faculty scholarship series. Accessed from http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/3609
Dworkin R (1978) Taking rights seriously. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass
Google Scholar
Dworkin R (1985) A matter of principle. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass
Google Scholar
Dworkin R (1986) Law’s empire. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Mass
Google Scholar
Dworkin R (1999) Freedom’s law: the moral reading of the American constitution. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Google Scholar
Dworkin R (2006, May 24) It is absurd to calculate human rights according to a cost-benefit analysis. In: The Guardian. Accessed from http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2006/may/24/comment.politics
Dworkin R (2008) Is democracy possible here? Principles for a new political debate. Woodstock: Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. Accessed from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=273131
Dworkin R (2011) Justice for hedgehogs. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass
Google Scholar
Esser J (1964) Grundsatz und Norm in der richterlichen Fortbildung des Privatrechts: rechtsvergleichende Beiträge zur Rechtsquellen- und Interpretationslehre, 2nd edn. Mohr, Tübingen
Google Scholar
Fassò G (2000) Jusnaturalismo. In: Bobbio N, Matteucci N, Pasquino G (eds) Dicionário de política, vol I. Editora Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia
Google Scholar
Gardbaum S (2010) A democratic defense of constitutional balancing. Law Ethics Hum Rights 4(1):79–106
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Grau ER (1990) A Ordem Econômica na Constituição de 1988: interpretação e crítica. São Paulo, RT
Google Scholar
Günther K (1988) Der Sinn für Angemessenheit: Anwendungsdiskurse in Moral und Recht, 1st edn. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main
Google Scholar
Häberle P (1997) Hermenêutica Constitucional - A Sociedade Aberta dos Intérpretes da Constituição: Contribuição para a interpretação Pluralista e ‘Procedimental’ da Constituição (G. F. Mendes, Trans.). Sérgio Antônio Fabris, Porto Alegre
Google Scholar
Hall JB (2008) Taking rechts seriously: Ronald Dworkin and the federal constitutional court of Germany. German Law J 9:771
Google Scholar
Hare RM (1981) Moral thinking: its levels, method, and point. Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York
Google Scholar
Hintikka KJ (1971) Some main problems of deontic logic. In: Hilpinen R (ed) Deontic logic: introductory and systematic readings. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 59–104. Accessed from http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=3104077
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Jacobsohn GJ (2012) Constitutional values and principles. In: Rosenfeld M, Sajó A (eds) The Oxford handbook of comparative constitutional law, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 777–791
Google Scholar
Jakab A (2009) Concept and function of principles. A critique of Robert Alexy. In: Borowski M (ed) On the nature of legal principles: proceedings of the Special Workshop ‘The principles theory’ held at the 23rd world congress of the international association for philosophy of law and social philosophy (IVR), Kraków, 2007. Steiner, Stuttgart, pp 145–159. Accessed from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1918421
Jameson F (1988) The vanishing mediator; or, max weber as soryteller. In: The ideologies of theory: essays 1971–1986, vol 2. Routledge, London, pp 3–34
Google Scholar
Jansen N (1997) Die Abwägung von Grundrechten. Der Staat Berlin 36:27–54
Google Scholar
Jansen N (1998) Die Struktur der Gerechtigkeit, 1st edn. Nomos-Verl.-Ges, Baden-Baden
Google Scholar
Jestaedt M (1999) Grundrechtsentfaltung im Gesetz: Studien zur Interdependenz von Grundrechtsdogmatik und Rechtsgewinnungstheorie. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen
Google Scholar
Klatt M (2004) Theorie der Wortlautgrenze: semantische Normativität in der juristischen Argumentation, 1st edn. Nomos Verl.-Ges, Baden-Baden
Google Scholar
Klatt M (2012) Robert Alexy’s philosophy of law as system. In: Institutionalized reason: the jurisprudence of Robert Alexy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Klatt M (ed) (2013) Prinzipientheorie und Theorie der Abwägung. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen
Google Scholar
Klatt M (2015) Positive rights: who decides? Judicial review in balance. Int J Const Law 13(2):354–382. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mov019
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Klatt M, Meister M (2012a) Proportionality—A benefit to human rights? Remarks on the I·CON controversy. Int J Const Law 10(3):687–708. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mos019
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Klatt M, Meister M (2012b) The constitutional structure of proportionality, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Klatt M, Schmidt J (2012) Epistemic discretion in constitutional law. Int J Const Law 10(1):69–105. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mor056
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Kommers DP, Miller RA (2012) The constitutional jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany, 3nd ed, revised and expanded. Duke University Press, Durham, N.C
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Kumm M (2004) Constitutional rights as principles: on the structure and domain of constitutional justice. A review essay on a theory of constitutional rights. Int J Const Law 2(3):574–596. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/2.3.574
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Kumm M (2006) Who is afraid of the total constitution? Constitutional rights as principles and the constitutionalization of private law. German Law J 7:341
Google Scholar
Kumm M (2007) Political liberalism and the structure of rights: on the place and limits of the proportionality requirement. In: Pavlakos G (ed) Law, rights and discourse: the legal philosophy of Robert Alexy. Hart Publishing, Oxford, Portland, Oregon, pp 131–166
Google Scholar
Larenz K (1979a) Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Larenz K (1979b) Richtiges Recht: Grundzüge e. Rechtsethik. Beck, München
Google Scholar
Manero JR (n.d.) Rules and principles. In: IVR encyclopaedia of jurisprudence, legal theory and philosophy of law. Accessed from http://ivr-enc.info/index.php?title=Rules_and_Principles&oldid=1340
McHarg A (1999) Reconciling human rights and the public interest: conceptual problems and doctrinal uncertainty in the jurisprudence of the European court of human rights. Modern Law Rev 62(5):671–696. https://doi.org/10.2307/1097381
Meirelles HL (2010) Direito Administrativo Brasileiro, 36 ed, atual. até a EC 64/2010. Malheiros, São Paulo
Google Scholar
Miller BW (2008) Justification and rights limitations. In: Expounding the constitution. Cambridge University Press, pp 93–115. Accessed from http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511511042.006
Möller K (2007) Balancing and the structure of constitutional rights. Int J Const Law 5(3):453–468. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mom023
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Möller K (2012) Proportionality: challenging the critics. Int J Const Law 10(3):709–731. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mos024
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Ponce VM (1995) Management of droughts and floods in the semiarid Brazilian Northeast—The case for conservation. J Soil Water Conserv 50(5):422–431
Google Scholar
Poscher R (2009a) Insights, errors and self-misconceptions of the theory of principles. Ratio Juris, 22(4):425–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2009.00434.x
Poscher R (2009b) The principle theory: how many theories and what is their merit? (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1411181). Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY. Accessed from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1411181
Pulido CB (2007a) El principio de proporcionalidad y los derechos fundamentales: el principio de proporcionalidad como criterio para determinar el contenido de los derechos fundamentales vinculante para el legislador. Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, Madrid
Google Scholar
Pulido CB (2007b) Grundrechtsprinzipien in Spanien: Rationalität und Grenzen der Abwägung. In: Sieckmann J-R (ed) Die Prinzipientheorie der Grundrechte: Studien zur Grundrechtstheorie Robert Alexys, 1st edn. Nomos Verl.-Ges, Baden-Baden, pp 197–214
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Raabe M (1998) Grundrechte und Erkenntnis: der Einschätzungsspielraum des Gesetzgebers, 1st edn. Nomos-Verl.-Ges, Baden-Baden
Google Scholar
Radbruch G (2006) Statutory lawlessness and supra-statutory law. Oxford J Leg Stud 26(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi041
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Rawls J (1999) A theory of justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass
Google Scholar
Rivers J (2010) A theory of constitutional rights and the British constitution. In: A theory of constitutional rights. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Google Scholar
Romano PA, Garcia EAC (1999) Policies for water-resources planning and management of the São Francisco river basin. In: Biswas AK, Cordeiro NV, Braga BPS, Tortajada C (eds) Management of Latin American River Basins: Amazon, Plata, and São Francisco. United Nations University Press, New York, pp 245–271
Google Scholar
Ross WD (2002) The right and the good, New edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Sarlet IW (2009) A eficácia dos direitos fundamentais: uma teoria deral dos direitos fundamentais na perspectiva constitucional. Livraria do Advogado, Porto Alegre
Google Scholar
Schlink B (1976) Abwägung im Verfassungsrecht (1. Aufl). Duncker und Humblot, Berlin
Google Scholar
Schlink B (1991) Open justice in a closed legal system. Cardozo Law Rev 13:1713
Google Scholar
Schlink B (1992) German constitutional culture in transition. Cardozo Law Rev 14:711
Google Scholar
Schlink B (2003) Hercules in Germany. Int J Const Law 1:610
Google Scholar
Schlink B (2011) Proportionality in constitutional law: why everywhere but here. Duke J Comp Int Law 22:291–302
Google Scholar
Schwabe J (2005) Cinqüenta anos de jurisprudência do Tribunal Constitucional Federal Alemão (Martins L, de Carvalho MB, de Castro TM, Trans.). Fundación Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, Montevideo
Google Scholar
Searle J (1978) Prima facie obligations. In: Raz J (ed) Practical reasoning. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 81–90
Google Scholar
Sieckmann J-R (1990) Regelmodelle und Prinzipienmodelle des Rechtssystems, 1st edn. Nomos-Verl.-Ges, Baden-Baden
Google Scholar
Sieckmann J-R (1994) Zur Abwägungsfähigkeit von Prinzipien. Archiv Für Rechts- Und Sozial-philoso-phie Beiheft 53:205–213
Google Scholar
da Silva VA (2010) Direitos Fundamentais: Conteúdo essencial, restrições e eficácia, 2nd edn. Malheiros Editores, São Paulo
Google Scholar
da Silva VA (2011) Comparing the incommensurable: constitutional principles, balancing and rational decision. Oxford J Leg Stud 31(2):273–301. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqr004
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Sweet AS, Mathews J (2010) All things in proportion-American rights review and the problem of balancing. Emory LJ 60:797
Google Scholar
Tremblay LB (2014) An egalitarian defense of proportionality-based balancing. Int J Const Law 12(4):864–890. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mou060
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Tsakyrakis S (2009) Proportionality: an assault on human rights? Int J Const Law 7(3):468–493. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mop011
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Tsakyrakis S (2010) Proportionality: an assault on human rights?: a rejoinder to Madhav Khosla. Int J Const Law 8(2):307–310. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moq017
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Tuori K (2004) Fundamental rights principles: disciplining the instrumentalism of policies. In: Menéndez AJ, Erik OE (eds) Constitutional rights through discourse: on Robert Alexy’s legal theory-European and theoretical perspectives. Arena, Oslo, pp 55–76
Google Scholar
Waldron J (1993) A right-based critique of constitutional rights. Oxford J Leg Stud 13(1):18–51
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Webber G (2009) The negotiable constitution: on the limitation of rights. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, New York
Google Scholar
Yowell P (2007) Critical examination of Dworkin’s theory of rights. Am J Jurisprud 52:93–137
CrossRef
Google Scholar