Abstract
This chapter uses inquiry-based learning as an approach to discuss three strategies for teaching English Language Learners science content: (a) short silent movies, (b) interactive word walls, and (c) interactive science notebooks. This approach has theoretical grounding in cognitive and social learning theories (i.e., Piaget, Vygotsky, and Cambourne). We discuss the best methods to implement these strategies, suggestions to modify them, as well as the limitations of each. We provide vignettes that focus on natural selection to give context for each strategy. The chapter concludes with a summary of each strategy, a brief discussion on how to combine these strategies for maximum benefit, as well as, questions to reflect on how to promote best practices with these strategies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amaral, O. M., Garrison, L., & Klentschy, M. (2002). Helping English language learners increase achievement through inquiry-based science instruction. Bilingual Research Journal, 26(2), 213–239.
August, D., Carlo, M., Dressler, C., & Snow, C. (2005). The critical role of vocabulary development for English language learners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20(1), 50–57.
Bravo, M., & Garcia, E. E. (2014, April). Learning to write like scientists: English language learners’ science inquiry and writing understandings in responsive learning contexts. Paper presented at the American Educational Researchers Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA.
Bruna, K. R., Vann, R., & Escudero, M. P. (2007). What’s language got to do with it?: A case study of academic language instruction in high school “English learner science” class. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6, 36–54.
Butler, M. B., & Nesbit, C. (2008). Using science notebooks to improve writing skills and conceptual understanding. Science Activities, 44(4), 137–146.
Buxton, C. A., & Lee, O. (2014). English language learners in science education. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 204–222). New York, NY: Routledge.
Cambourne, B. (1995). Toward an educationally relevant theory of literacy learning: Twenty years of inquiry. The Reading Teacher, 49(3), 182–192.
Carrier, K. A. (2005). Supporting science learning through science literacy objectives for English language learners. Science Activities, 42(2), 5–11.
Clark, D., Nelson, B., Atkinson, R. K., Ramirez-Marin, F., & Medina-Jerez, W. (2014). Integrating flexible language supports within online science learning environments. In R. Bloymeyer, T. Ganesh, & H. Waxman (Eds.), Research on technology use in multicultural settings (pp. 75–106). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publications.
Collier, V. P., & Thomas, W. P. (2001). Educating linguistically and culturally diverse students in correctional settings. The Journal of Correctional Education, 52(2), 68–73.
Cuevas, P., Lee, O., Hart, J., & Deaktor, R. (2005). Improving science inquiry with elementary students of diverse backgrounds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 337–357.
Danan, M. (2004). Captioning and subtitling: Undervalued language learning strategies. Meta: Journal des traducteurs/Meta: Translators’ Journal, 49(1), 67–77.
Elliot, J. (2007). Summarizing with drawings: A reading-comprehension strategy. Science Scope, 30(5), 23–27.
Fulton, L., & Campbell, B. (2004). Student-centered notebooks. Science and Children, 42(3), 26–29.
Gambrell, L., & Marinak, B. (1997). Incentive and intrinsic motivation to read. In J. T. Guthrie & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Reading engagement: Motivating readers through integrated instruction (pp. 205–217). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Gilbert, J., & Kotelman, M. (2005). Five good reasons to use science notebooks. Science and Children, 43(3), 28–32.
Harmon, J., Wood, K., & Kiser, K. (2009). Promoting vocabulary learning with the interactive word wall. Middle School Journal, 40(3), 58–63.
Herr, N. (2008). The sourcebook for teaching science: Strategies, activities, and instructional resources. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, a Wiley Imprint.
Hodson, D. (2009). Teaching and learning about science. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Jackson, J., & Durham, A. (2016). Put your walls to work: Planning and using interactive word walls to support science and reading instruction. Science and Children, 54(3), 78–84.
Jackson, J., & Narvaez, R. (2013). Interactive word walls. Science and Children, 51(1), 42–49.
Jackson, J., Tripp, S., & Cox, K. (2011). Interactive word walls: Transforming content vocabulary instruction. Science Scope, 35(3), 45–49.
Lee, O., & Buxton, C. A. (2013). Integrating science and English proficiency for English language learners. Theory Into Practice, 52, 36–42.
Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (1998). Science for all, including students from non-English-language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 27(4), 12–21.
MacKinnon, G., & Williams, P. (2006). Models for integrating technology in higher education: The physics of sound. Journal of College Science Teaching, 35, 22–25.
Manz, E. (2012). Understanding the codevelopment of modeling practice and ecological knowledge. Science Education, 96, 1071–1105. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21030
Martin, D. J. (2000). Elementary science methods: A constructivist approach (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Michaels, S., Shouse, A. W., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2008). Ready, set, SCIENCE!: Putting research to work in K-8 science classrooms. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Miller, B., & Martin, C. (2016). Digital notebooks for digital natives: Supporting early childhood science and engineering practices with e-notebooks and whiteboard applications. Science and Children, 53(5), 84–89.
Murcia, K. (2014). Interactive and multimodal pedagogy: A case study of how teachers and students use interactive whiteboard technology in primary science. Australian Journal of Education, 58(1), 74–88.
National Research Council. (1996). The national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
NCTE. (2013). The NCTE definition of 21st century literacies. Retrieved from http://www.ncte.org/positions/statements/21stcentdefinition
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
NSTA. (2003). Position statement: Scientific inquiry (under revision). Retrieved from http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/inquiry.aspx
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Reynolds, P., & Symons, S. (2001). Motivational variable and children’s text search. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 14–22.
Roth, W. M. (2005). Talking science: Language and learning in science classrooms. Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Sibold, C. (2011). Building English language learners’ academic vocabulary: Strategies & tips. Multicultural Education, 18(2), 24–28.
Soto Huerta, M. (2012). Guiding biliteracy development: Appropriating cross-linguistic and conceptual knowledge to sustain second-language reading comprehension. Bilingual Research Journal: The Journal of the National Association for Bilingual Education, 35(2), 179–196.
Stoddart, T., Pinal, A., Latzke, M., & Canaday, D. (2002). Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(8), 664–687.
Talaván, N., & Rodríguez-Arancón, P. (2014). The use of reverse subtitling as an online collaborative language learning tool. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 8(1), 84–101.
Towndrow, P. A., Ling, T. A., & Venthan, A. M. (2008). Promoting inquiry through science journal writing. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, & Technology Education, 4, 279–283.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wong, M. (2014). Smart virtual word walls: Moving away from the traditional into the digital. English in Texas, 40(1), 27–29.
Young, J. (2003). Science interactive notebooks in the classroom. Science Scope, 26(4), 44–47.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reid, J.W., Smith-Walters, C., Mangione, K.A., Dorris, A., Tharp, T. (2019). Supporting English Language Learners Through Inquiry-Based Science: Three Strategies for Your Classroom. In: de Oliveira, L.C., Obenchain, K.M., Kenney, R.H., Oliveira, A.W. (eds) Teaching the Content Areas to English Language Learners in Secondary Schools. English Language Education, vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02245-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02245-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02244-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02245-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)