Skip to main content

Climate Change Impacts on Four Agricultural, Headwater Watersheds from Varying Climatic Regions of New Zealand

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hydrology in a Changing World

Part of the book series: Springer Water ((SPWA))

Abstract

Climate change impacts on air temperature, precipitation and surface flows in four agricultural, headwater watersheds (Toenepi and Waiokura in North Island and Inchbonnie and Bog Burn in South Island) from varying climatic regions—warm subtropical to cool temperate—of New Zealand were examined using a suite of soil moisture accounting models. The models were calibrated and validated using observed flows from the four watersheds. Using the validated models and published climate change data from two future periods, 2030–49 (referred to as 2040) and 2080–99 (2090), and one current period, (1980–99, referred to as 1990), the impacts on air temperature and hydrology were investigated. The future periods considered three emission scenarios: low (B1), medium (A1B) and high (A1FI). The model outputs were analysed for changes in air temperature, precipitation and surface flows from 1990 conditions. Under climate change, temperature, precipitation and surface flows were predicted to increase from low to high emission scenarios, and from 1990 conditions. As the climate warms up, the warm subtropical Toenepi watershed was predicted to undergo less warming than the cool temperate Bog Burn watershed, though the former would undergo more frequent dry spells (days without rain) and low flows than the latter. With climate change, agriculturally, non-growing season (April–September) is likely to record greater temperature increases and more intense precipitation than growing (October–March) season. In all four watersheds, climate change was predicted to result in increases in mean and maximum daily precipitation. Soil moisture accounting models predicted that this could result in increases in maximum daily flows in the two South Island watersheds. However, owing to extended dry spells, the two North Island watersheds are likely to record decreases in mean and maximum flows. As all the four watersheds considered are dominantly animal grazed, reduction in precipitation during the growing season may negatively impact pasture growth. To sustain agricultural productivity, the farmers and producers may need to explore other measures such as irrigation, reduced stock density, importation of feed, use to drought-resistant pasture species and/or development of water storage options to counter dry spells, all of which may result in significant to transformative changes to agricultural practices and farmer water use behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Andreasson J, Bergstorm S, Carlsson B, Graham LP, Lindstrom G (2004) Hydrological change–Climate change impact simulations for Sweden. Ambio 33:228–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andrews FT, Croke BFW, Jakeman AJ (2011) An open software environment for hydrological model assessment and development. Environ Model Softw 26:1171–1185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bai Y, Wagener T, Reed P (2009) A top-down framework for watershed model evaluation and selection under uncertainty. Environ Model Softw 24:901–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bates BC, Kundzewicz ZW, Wu S, Palutikof JP (eds) (2008) Climate change and water. Technical paper of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC Secterariat, Geneva, 210 pages

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boe J, Terray L, Martin E, Habets F (2009) Projected changes in components of the hydrological cycle in French river basins during the 21st century. Water Resour Res 45:W08426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boughton W (2004) The Australian water balance model. Environ Model Softw 19:943–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Burnash RJC (1995) The NWS river forecast system-catchment modeling. In: Singh VP (ed) Computer models for watershed hydrology. CAB Direct, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom, pp 311–366. ISBN 0-918334-91-8

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clark MP, Hreinsson EO, Martinez G, Tait A, Slater AG, Hendrikx J, Owens I, Gupta H, Schmidt J, Woods R (2009) Simulations of seasonal snow for the South Island, New Zealand. J Hydrol (NZ) 48:41–58

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cliflo (2013) The national climate database. http://cliflo.niwa.co.nz/. Accessed 14 Dec 2013

  10. Croke BFW, Jakeman AJ (2004) A catchment moisture deficit module for the ihacres rainfall-runoff model. Environ Model Softw 19:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dibike YB, Coulibaly P (2005) Hydrologic impact of climate change in the Saguenay watershed: comparison of downscaling methods and hydrologic models. J Hydrol 307:145–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gay MD (1990) Usage summary for selected optimization routines. Computing Science Technical Report No. 153. AT&T Bell Murray Hill, NJ 07974, USA

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hassan Z, Harun S (2011) Hydrological response of a catchment to climate change in the Kurau River basin, Perak, Malaysia. In: Proceedings of 3rd international conference on managing rivers in the 21st century: sustainable solutions for global crisis of flooding, pollution and water scarcity. 6– 9 Dec 2011, Penang, Malaysia, pp 216–225

    Google Scholar 

  14. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007) The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 996 pages

    Google Scholar 

  15. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2013) Working group I contribution to the IPCC fifth assessment report: the physical science basis. Final draft underlying scientific-technical assessment. In: Christensen J, Kanikicharla KK (eds). http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/uploads/WGIAR5_WGI-12Doc2b_FinalDraft_TechnicalSummary.pdf. Accessed 14 Dec 2013

  16. Jakeman AJ, Hornberger GM (1993) How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall-runoff model? Water Resour Res 29:2637–2649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kay AL, Davies HN, Bell V, Jones RG (2009) Comparison of uncertainty sources for climate change impacts: flood frequency in England. Clim Change 92:41–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9471-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kenny G (2010) Adaptation in agriculture: lessons for resilience from eastern regions of New Zealand. In: Nottage RAC, Wratt DS, Bornman JF, Jones K (eds) Climate change adaptation in New Zealand: future scenarios and some sectoral perspectives. New Zealand Climate Change Centre, Wellington, New Zealand, pp 56–69

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kokkonen T, Koivusalo H, Jakeman A, Norton J (2006) Construction of a degreeday snow model in the light of the “ten iterative steps in model development”. In: Voinov A, Jakeman AJ, Rizzoli AE (eds) Proceedings of the IEMSs third biennial meeting: summit on environmental modelling and software. International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, Burlington, USA

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kundzewicz ZW, Mata LJ, Arnell NW, Doll P, Jimenez B, Miller K, Oki T, Sen Z, Shiklomanov I (2008) The implications of projected climate change for freshwater resources and their management. Hydrol Sci J 53:3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Madden RA, Kidson JW (1997) The potential long-range predictability of temperature over New Zealand. Int J Climatol 17:483–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Madden RA, Shea DJ, Katz RW, Kidson JW (1999) The potential long-range predictability of precipitation over New Zealand. Int J Climatol 19:405–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. MfE (Ministry for the Environment) (2016) Climate change projections for New Zealand: atmosphere projections based on simulations from the IPCC fifth assessment. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, 127 pages. ISBN: 978-0-908339-44-0; Publication number: ME 1247

    Google Scholar 

  24. MfE (Ministry for the Environment) (2010) Tools for estimating the effects of climate change on flood flow: a guidance manual for local government in New Zealand. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, New Zealand. Report CHC2008-110, 93 pages

    Google Scholar 

  25. MfE (Ministry for the Environment) (2008) Climate change effects and impacts assessment: a guidance manual for local government in New Zealand, 2nd edn. Wellington, New Zealand. http://www.mfe.govt.nz/publications/climate/climate-change-effect-impacts-assessments-may08/index.html. Accessed 15 Dec 2010

  26. Mullan AB, Thompson CS, Woods RA (2001) Future climate and river flow scenarios. NIWA Client Report No. WLG 2001/26. 46 p

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mullan AB, Dean S (2009) AR4 climate model validation and scenarios for New Zealand. In: Presented at 9th international conference on Southern hemisphere meteorology and ocenography, Melbourne, 9–13 Feb 2009. Available from http://www.bom.govt.au/events/9icshmo/program_4.sthml. Accessed 6 Dec 2013

  28. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models Part I: a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. NIWA (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Limited) (2013) Overview of New Zealand climate. http://www.niwa.co.nz/education-and-training/schools/resources/climate/overview. Accessed 14 Dec 2013

  30. Perrin C, Michel C, Andreassian V (2003) Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation. J Hydrol 279:275–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Reisinger A (2009) Climate change 101: an educational resource. Science-impacts-adaptation-mitigation-decision-making challenges. Institute of Policy Studies and New Zealand Climate Change Research Institute, School of Government, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand, 303 pages

    Google Scholar 

  32. Scarf W (2007) Seven-day mean annual low flow and mean annual flow mapping of the Waipara River catchment, North Canterbury. Report No. U08/10 ISBN 978-1-86937-779-3. Environment Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. 47 pages. http://ecan.govt.nz/publications/Reports/seven-day-mean-annual-low-flow-mean-annual-flow-mapping-waipara-river.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 12 2014

  33. Srinivasan MS, Schmidt J, Poyck S, Hreinsson E (2011) Irrigation reliability under climate change scenarios: a modelling: investigation in a river-based irrigation scheme in New Zealand. J Am Water Resour Assoc 47:1261–1274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00568.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tait A, Woods R (2007) Spatial interpolation of daily potential evapotranspiration for New Zealand using a spline model. J Hydrometeorol 8:430–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tait A, Henderson R, Turner R, Zheng X (2006) Thin plate smoothing spline interpolation of daily rainfall for New Zealand using a climatological rainfall surface. Int J Climatol 26:2097–2115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Vel´azquez JA, Schmid J, Ricard S, Muerth MJ, Gauvin St-Denis B, Minville M, Chaumont D, Caya D, Ludwig R, Turcotte R (2013) An ensemble approach to assess hydrological models’ contribution to uncertainties in the analysis of climate change impact on water resources. Hydrol Earth Syt Sci 17:565–578

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wilcock RJ, Monaghan RM, Quinn JM, Srinivasan MS, Houlbrooke DJ, Duncan MJ, Wright-Stow AE, Scarsbrook MR (2013) Trends in water quality of five dairy farming streams in response to adoption of best practice and benefits of long-term monitoring at the catchment scale. Mar Freshw Res 64:401–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wilcock RJ, Monaghan R, Srinivasan MS, Wright-Stow AE (2012). Best practice catchments for sustainable dairy farming: review of a long-term monitoring study of water quality trends. National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Client report, HAM2012-071. Hamilton, New Zealand. 58 pages

    Google Scholar 

  39. Woods R, Tait A, Mullan B, Hendrikx J, Diettrich J (2008) Projected climate and river flow for the rangitata catchment for 2040. National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Report CHC2008-097, Christchurch, New Zealand. 36 pages

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Einar Hreinsson and Christian Zammit, NIWA-Christchurch, and the Climate Variability and Change team, NIWA-Greta Point, for their assistance in compiling the climate change data for this study. We acknowledge the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment for funding the programme Justified Irrigation (CO1X1617) that provided partial support in developing the work presented here.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. S. Srinivasan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Srinivasan, M.S., Singh, S.K., Wilcock, R.J. (2019). Climate Change Impacts on Four Agricultural, Headwater Watersheds from Varying Climatic Regions of New Zealand. In: Singh, S., Dhanya, C. (eds) Hydrology in a Changing World. Springer Water. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02197-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics