Skip to main content

Long-Term International Trade Analysis Measuring Spatial Extension of Globalization: Kuznets or Hysteresis Paradigm?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Abstract

How is trade globalizing? And how can globalization of trade be modeled? Based on a new spatial inequality metric applied to WTO cross table of world trade figures from 2000 to 2016, the spatial evolution of globalization extension is measured and can be interpreted according to the globalization types model. The result shows that after a sustained globalization tendency in the time period 2003–2012, since 2013 the international trade system is again de-globalizing. These are indications that for trade globalization may apply the inverse Kuznets paradigm. The differentiated regional globalization evolution can be explained with the globalization types respectively for the globalization expansion by Heckscher-Ohlin and Stolper-Samuelson trade models and for the ongoing de-globalization period by Linder’s trade model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Degain, C., & Maurer, A. (2010). Globalization and trade flows: What you see is not what you get, WTO working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüttimann, B. (2007). Modeling economic globalization—A post-neoclassic view on foreign trade and competition. Münster, Germany: MV-Wissenschaft. ISBN 978-3-86582-447-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüttimann, B. (2010). Measuring economic globalization: Entropy—based inequality risk metric. Europa Regionum, XIII, 7–23 (University of Stettin, Poland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruettimann, B. (2011). An entropy-based inequality risk metric to measure economic globalization. In Proceedings of 1st Conference on Spatial Statistics. Procedia Environmental Sciences (Vol. 3, pp. 38–43). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüttimann, B. (2016). Evolution of trade globalization from 2003–2014: Weakening dynamics of world trade confirms globalization postulates. Paper presented at ICOAE 2016. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Applied Economics (ICOAE), July 7–9, 2016. Nicosia, Cyprus: Advances in Applied Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüttimann, B. (2017 presented). Evidence for the globalization types model integrating different trade theories. Paper to be published in International Journal of Computational Economics and Econometrics (IJCEE).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

My very special thank goes to WTO, especially to Christoph Degain, providing me with the latest available trade data as well as with the data from the beginning of WTO cross trade tabulation gathering, encouraging this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno G. Rüttimann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 29.1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rüttimann, B.G. (2018). Long-Term International Trade Analysis Measuring Spatial Extension of Globalization: Kuznets or Hysteresis Paradigm?. In: Tsounis, N., Vlachvei, A. (eds) Advances in Time Series Data Methods in Applied Economic Research. ICOAE 2018. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02194-8_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics