Skip to main content

An Analysis of the Status of CSR Practice in the South African Business Context: A Framework for Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1016 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Abstract

South African organisations often focus on financial targets instead of building relationships with stakeholders in their operating environments (Verwey and Muir in Communication and media ethics in South Africa. JUTA & Company, Cape Town, pp. 210–229, 2011: 212). The political, economic and socio-economic circumstances within the country and increased demands from different stakeholders with their own specific interests, have created an unpredictable and volatile environment in which organisations have to function (Nasrullah and Rahim in CSR, sustainability, ethics & governance. Springer, Cham, 2014: 41). This volatility, along with mounting social pressure, means that no organisation can function in isolation. Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activities only for reputational benefit results in a “check-the-box” approach to CSR which is unsustainable over time. In order to address the unsustainable nature of CSR practices in South Africa, this paper proposes an adaptation of the DNA of CSR 2.0 model previously developed by Visser (CSR 2.0 transforming corporate sustainability and responsibility. Springer, London, 2014: 1). Limitations are addressed with regard to the South African business context, and recommendations are made to address the remaining limitations of this model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdulai, D. (2015). From charity to mutual benefit: A new and sustainable look at CSR in Africa. In New perspectives on corporate social responsibility (pp. 427–442).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2007). Investor sentiment in the stock market. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 129–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosman, P., & Buys, P. (2010). The ethics of corporate sustainability (pp. 9–12). Autumn: Word and Action.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dash, N. K. (2005). Selection of the research paradigm and research methodology [Online]. Available from: http://www.celt.mmu.ac.uk/researchmethods/Modules/Selection_of_methodology/. Accessed August 22, 2016.

  • Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fasset (Finance and Accounting Services Sector Education and Training Authority). (2012). Corporate social responsibility course handbook. Johannesburg: Fasset.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holman, P. (2010). Engaging emergence. Turning upheaval into opportunity. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurn, B. J. (2008). Ethics in international business. Industrial and Commercial Training, 40(7), 347–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, M. E. (2016). Draft King IV Report on corporate governance for South Africa 2016. Institute of Directors South Africa (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mersham, G., & Skinner, C. (2008). Corporate social responsibility in South Africa: Emerging trends. Society and Business Review, 3(3), 239–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, V. (2013). Stakeholder understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in emerging markets with a focus on Middle East, Africa (MEA) and Asia. Journal of Global Policy and Governance, 2, 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40320-013-0026-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasrullah, N. M., & Rahim, M. M. (2014). Trends in CSR practices in developed and developing countries. In CSR, sustainability, ethics & governance. Cham: Springer. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02350-2_3.

  • Overton-de Klerk, N., & Oelofse, E. (2010). Poor communities as corporate stakeholders: A bottom up research approach. Communicatio, 36(3), 388–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton-de Klerk, N., & Verwey, S. (2013). Towards an emerging paradigm of strategic communication: Core driving forces. Communicatio, 39(3), 362–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spicer, C. H. (2000). Public relations in a democratic society: Value and values. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12(1), 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ströh, U. (2007). Relationships and participation: A complexity science approach to change communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(2), 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verwey, S. (2001). Into the age of communication. Communicatio, 27(1), 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verwey, S., & Muir, C. (2011). Ethical corporate communication cultures within brand environments. In N. Hyde-Clarke (Ed.), Communication and media ethics in South Africa (pp. 210–229). Cape Town: JUTA & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, W. (2014). CSR 2.0 transforming corporate sustainability and responsibility (1st ed.). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, A. (2014). Ubuntu and business ethics: Problems, perspectives and prospects. Journal of Business Ethics, 121, 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerfass, A., & Huck, S. (2007). Innovation, communication and leadership: New developments in strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(2), 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elrida Vos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vos, E., Oberholzer, N. (2018). An Analysis of the Status of CSR Practice in the South African Business Context: A Framework for Analysis. In: Tsounis, N., Vlachvei, A. (eds) Advances in Time Series Data Methods in Applied Economic Research. ICOAE 2018. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02194-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics