Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Dark Side of Leadership

Abstract

Leadership has on occasion been presented as a sort of mystical status or title, which allows those who hold it to resolve all their problems as if by waving a magic wand. In fact, leaders are often considered to be heroes within their organizations. As in the general perception of the public and among employees, there is a vague perception in the relevant literature that under most circumstances leaders bring success both to employees and organizations. This places great expectations on leadership and, on occasion, huge disappointments. It is true that successful leadership brings success and increases performance, but not all charismatic individuals can be successful, or even successful leaders. Leaders are sometimes perceived as charismatic and flawless individuals who are capable of leading organizations from success to success without any hiccups along the way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • DeCelles, K. A., DeRue, D. S., Margolis, J. D., & Ceranic, T. L. (2012). Does power corrupt or enable? When and why power facilitates self-interested behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 681–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., Aasland, M. S., & Skogstad, A. (2007). Destructive leadership behaviour: A definition and conceptual model. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 207–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, M. (2009). The good, the bad and the ugly: Leadership and narcissism. Journal of Change Management, 9(2), 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hott, L. R. (1979). The antisocial character. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 39, 235–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellerman, B. (2004). Thinking about... Leadership. Warts and all. Harvard Business Review, 82(1), 40–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. M. (2003). The harder they fall. Harvard Business Review, 81(10), 58–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman-Blumen, J. (2005). The allure of toxic leaders: Why we follow destructive bosses and corrupt politicians-and how we can survive them. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Foundations for organizational science. London: A Sage Publication Series.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kurtulmuş, B.E. (2019). Introduction. In: The Dark Side of Leadership. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02038-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics