Abstract
Sharing economy platforms use crowdsourced suppliers to provide customers with services or goods. Their decision making often revolves around pricing and matching. Platforms like Uber charge the customers a price for using the services or goods and offer the crowdsourced suppliers a wage or pay for providing the services or goods. First, we study how the platform could optimally set the price and the wage for a single service or product in different market conditions, and investigate the performance of the fixed commission contract which uses a fixed commission percentage across all market conditions. Second, even with determined pricing decisions, the platform also faces the task of matching customers with suppliers. We consider a stochastic, dynamic model with multiple demand types to be matched with multiple supply types over a planning horizon. We characterize the optimal matching policy by determining the priorities of the demand-supply pairs, under a sufficient condition on the reward structure. Then, the results are applied to two cases with more specific reward structures; namely, the horizontal reward structure and the vertical reward structure, to better characterize the optimal policy. Finally, we study the joint pricing and matching decision by a platform for a single service or product and take into account suppliers’ and customers’ forward-looking behavior. We propose a simple heuristic policy: fixed price and wage plus waiting compensation, in conjunction with the greedy matching policy on a first-come-first-served basis. This heuristic policy induces forward-looking suppliers and customers to behave myopically and is shown to be asymptotically optimal.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A product ordered from Amazon or a third-party supplier may not have originated from the original supplier. The program gives Amazon the flexibility to ship products on the basis of their geographic proximity to customers, thus shortening delivery times and reducing shipping costs.
- 2.
The monotonicity in this chapter is in its weaker sense unless otherwise specified.
- 3.
If x i = 0 (or y j = 0), we can delete demand node i (or supply node j) and all its connected arcs, on which matching quantities are set to zero.
- 4.
If all arcs are comparable under our partial order along the sequence, then it is a Monge sequence. But we do not require all arcs to be comparable.
References
Chen Y, Hu M (2018, forthcoming) Pricing and matching with forward-looking buyers and sellers. Manuf Serv Oper Manag. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2859864
Chen L, Mislove A, Wilson C (2015) Peeking beneath the hood of uber. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM conference on Internet measurement conference. ACM, New York, pp 495–508
Hu M, Zhou Y (2018a) Dynamic type matching, available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2592622
Hu M, Zhou Y (2018b) Price, wage and fixed commission in on-demand matching, available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2949513
Xu P, Allgor R, Graves S (2009) Benefits of reevaluating real-time order fulfillment decisions. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 11(2):340–355
Yu Y, Chen X, Zhang F (2015) Dynamic capacity management with general upgrading. Oper Res 63(6):1372–1389
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chen, Y., Hu, M., Zhou, Y. (2019). Pricing and Matching in the Sharing Economy. In: Hu, M. (eds) Sharing Economy. Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01863-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01863-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01862-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01863-4
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)