Skip to main content

Comparison of Three Control Strategies for an Upper Arm Rehabilitation Device

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Converging Clinical and Engineering Research on Neurorehabilitation III (ICNR 2018)

Part of the book series: Biosystems & Biorobotics ((BIOSYSROB,volume 21))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 114 Accesses

Abstract

The RETRAINER S1 system is an upper limb rehabilitation device designed to be used in repetitive task-oriented training. While the device itself is intrinsically controlled by the wearer, the execution of the training exercises is automatically controlled by a finite-state machine. This contribution discusses three different control strategies tested in a clinical environment.

Research supported by European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No 644721.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lawrence, E.S., et al.: Estimates of the prevalence of acute stroke impariments and disability in a multiethnic population. Stroke 32, 1279–1284 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Thomas, L.H., et al.: Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke: a major update of a cochrane review. Stroke 48(4), e102–e103 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Knutson, J.S., Fu, M.J., Sheffler, L.R., Chae, J.: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for motor restoration in hemiplegia. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am. 26(4), 729–745 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mehrholz, J., Pohl, M., Platz, T., Kugler, J., Elsner, B.: Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 11(11), CD006876 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ambrosini, E., et al.: The combined action of a passive exoskeleton and an EMG- controlled neuroprosthesis for upper limb stroke rehabilitation: first results of the RETRAINER project * (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Seel, T., Ruppin, S.: Eliminating the effect of magnetic disturbances on the inclination estimates of inertial sensors. IFAC-PapersOnLine 50(1), 8798–8803 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Zajc .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zajc, J., Puchinger, M., Russold, M., Gfoehler, M. (2019). Comparison of Three Control Strategies for an Upper Arm Rehabilitation Device. In: Masia, L., Micera, S., Akay, M., Pons, J. (eds) Converging Clinical and Engineering Research on Neurorehabilitation III. ICNR 2018. Biosystems & Biorobotics, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01845-0_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01845-0_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01844-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01845-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics