Abstract
The development of supporting technology often neglects real challenges for a self-determined lifestyle, especially in age. The objective of the contribution is to explain the KPB-methodology, which was developed in a project founded by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). This methodology allows capturing needs and problem situations of elderly people in their domestic environment. Implications for product development will be explained. With the project, we answered the question, which problems elderly people have to deal with for a self-determined life. We investigated the life situation based on socio-scientific methods and translated it into technical requirements.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Birken, T. (2014). IT-basierte Innovation als Implementations problem. Evolution und Grenzen des Technikakzeptanzmodell-Paradigmas, alternative Forschungsansätze und Anknüpfungspunkte für eine praxistheoretische Perspektive auf Innovationsprozesse, ISF. München.
Birken, T., Pelizäus-Hoffmeister, H., & Schweiger. P: Technische Assistenzsysteme und ihre Konkurrenten: zur Bedeutung von Praktiken der Alltagsbewältigung für die Technikentwicklung. In VDE, Zukunft Lebensräume-Kongress 2016 (pp. 84–89). Berlin: VDE-Verlag.
n.n. (2011). DIN EN ISO 9241-210:2011-01 Ergonomie der Mensch-System Interaktion – Teil 210: Prozess zur Gestaltung gebrauchstauglicher interaktiver Systeme. Beuth Verlag, Berlin.
Fichter, K. (2005). Modelle der Nutzerintegration in den Innovationsprozess. Werkstattbericht Nr. 75, Institut für Zukunftsstudien und Technologiebewertung. Berlin.
Gransche, B. (2017). Wir assistieren uns zu Tode. In P. Biniok and E. Lettkemann (Eds.): Assistive Gesellschaft. Multidisziplinäre Erkundungen zur Sozialform Assistenz. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Hassenzahl, M. (2015). Experience design. Technology for all the right reasons. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics.
Paetzold, K., & Wartzack, S. (2012). Challenges in the design of products for elderly people. In 9th International Workshop on Integrated Product Development, IPD Workshop, Magdeburg.
Paetzold, K., & Pelizäus-Hoffmeister, H. (2014). Structuring of application fields for technology for elderly people from the user perspective. In International Conference on Human Behavior in Design. October 14–17, 2014. Ascona.
Pongratz, H., & Birken, T. (2016). Praktikanz als Zieldimension anwendungsorientierter Forschung. In Forum qualitativer Sozialforschung. Vol. 16; Nr. 3, Art. 9.
Reinicke, T. (2004). Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Nutzerintegration in der Produktentwicklung. Technische Universität Berlin, Dissertation Fakultät für Verkehrs- und Maschinensysteme. Berlin.
Sarodnick, F., & Brau, H. (2006). Methoden der Usability Evaluation–Wissenschaftliche Grundlagen und praktische Anwendung, Bern: Huber.
Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11, 342–365.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Paetzold, K. (2018). Context-Integrating, Practice-Centered Analysis of Needs. In: Karafillidis, A., Weidner, R. (eds) Developing Support Technologies. Biosystems & Biorobotics, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01836-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01836-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01835-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01836-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)