Applying a Social-Relational Model to Explore the Curious Case of hitchBOT
This paper applies social-relational models of moral standing of robots to cases where the encounters between the robot and humans are relatively brief. Our analysis spans the spectrum of non-social robots to fully-social robots. We consider cases where the encounters are between a stranger and the robot and do not include its owner or operator. We conclude that the developers of robots that might be encountered by other people when the owner is not present cannot wash their hands of responsibility. They must take care with how they develop the robot’s interface with people and take into account how that interface influences the social relationship between it and people, and, thus, the moral standing of the robot with each person it encounters. Furthermore, we claim that developers have responsibility for the impact social robots have on the quality of human social relationships.
KeywordsHitchBOT Robot-human interaction Robotic interfaces Social robotics Social-relational model Anthropomorphic framing Robotic design
- Darling, Kate. 2015. ‘Who’s Johnny?’ Anthropomorphic framing in human-robot interaction, integration, and policy. Proceedings of WE Robot Conference on Robotics, Law & Policy 2015.Google Scholar
- ———. 2015. Developing automated deceptions and the impact on trust. Ethics and Information Technology 28 (1): 91–105.Google Scholar
- hitchBOT: A robot exploring the world. 2015. www.hitchbot.me/about. Accessed 28 Dec 2015.
- Naughton, K. 2015. Humans are slamming into driverless cars and exposing a key flaw. BloombergNews. www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-12-18/humans-are-slamming-into-driverless-cars-and-exposing-a-key-flaw. Accessed 8 Jan 2016.
- Turkle, Sherry. 2011. Alone together. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- VanderMaas, Johanna. 2015. hitchBOT USA tour comes to an early end in Philadelphia. cdn1.hitchbot.me/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/hitchBOT-USA-Trip-End-Press-Release-FINAL.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2015.