• Mohamed MahmoodEmail author
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)


Over the years, citizens’ trust and confidence in their governments has continued to decline and digital government is expected to reverse this trend. An enormous amount of money has been spent worldwide, on electronic government initiatives that are focused on improving performance, reducing costs and enhancing citizens' trust and confidence in their governments. Yet, of the many initiatives that have been implemented, very few have achieved real transformation of government (i.e. fundamental changes to the way core functions of government are performed to achieve noticeable gains in performance and efficiency). As such, there is a need to understand how transformation of government as a construct affects citizens’ trust and confidence in government in the presence of factors such as, government performance and citizen satisfaction. This research empirically investigates the influence of digital transformation of government on citizens’ trust and confidence in the context of the Kingdom of Bahrain. Bahrain is a top ranking country in terms of use of ICT in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region. A conceptual model was developed and validated using an online survey targeting randomly citizens of the Kingdom of Bahrain. Based on 313 responses, the findings of this research suggest that citizens' trust and confidence in their government is positively influenced by transformation of government, mediated by government performance and citizens’ satisfaction. The study found that e-government and technology are not enough for achieving a real transformation of government, and therefore, in tackling the decline in citizens’ trust and confidence in government. Other factors were found to be important in this equation, including transparency and accountability of government functions and activities in meeting citizens' expectations. The research offer multiple policy implications and theoretical contributions, in addition to helping understand how digital transformation of government can enhance citizens' trust and confidence in government, improve government-to-citizen relationship, and increase the adoption of digital services offered by governments. From a policy perspective, this research offers a validated conceptual model that can be used as a frame of reference when planning ICT-enabled transformation projects in government. From a theoretical context, this study is the first to investigate the relationship between transformation of government and citizens' trust and confidence in government.


Citizen Satisfaction Real Transformation Bahrain Weerakkody Mossberger 2006 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abu-Shanab E, Al-Azzam A (2012) Trust dimensions and the adoption of e-government in Jordan. Int J Inf Commun Technol Hum Dev (IJICTHD) 4(1):39–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al Rub S (2006) The impact of information technology on business performance management. The study of the Affairs Agency of Sudanese working abroad for the period (2000–2005). Master’s Thesis, University of Science and Technology, Omdurman, SudanGoogle Scholar
  3. Alsaeed A, Adams C, Boakes R (2014) Challenges to the successful implementation of e-government initiatives in middle-east arabic countries and syria: literature review. In tGov workshop 14Google Scholar
  4. Al-Shafi S, Weerakkody V (2008) The use of wireless internet parks to facilitate adoption and diffusion of e-government services: an empirical study in Qatar. AMCIS 2008 Proceedings, 322Google Scholar
  5. Al-Sobhi F, Weerakkody V, Kamal MM (2010) An exploratory study on the role of intermediaries in delivering public services in Madinah City: case of Saudi Arabia. Transforming government. People, Process and Policy 4(1):14–36Google Scholar
  6. Anthopoulos L, Reddick CG, Giannakidou I, Mavridis N (2016) Why e-government projects fail? An analysis of the website. Gov Inf Q 33(1):161–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bannister F, Connolly R (2011) Trust and transformational government: a proposed framework for research. Gov. Inf Q 28(2):137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Basu S (2004) E-government and developing countries: an overview. Int Rev Law, Comput & Technol 18(1):109–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bean C (2015) Changing citizen confidence: orientations towards political and social institutions in Australia, 1983–2010. The Open Polit Sci J 8(1):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bélanger F, Carter L (2008) Trust and risk in e-government adoption. J Strateg Inf Syst 17(2):165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bellamy C, Taylor J (1998) Governing in the information age. Open University Press, Buckingham, UK; Bristol, PAGoogle Scholar
  12. Bingham LB (2010) Online deliberation and the United States open government initiative. Online Deliberation, 53Google Scholar
  13. Bonham G, Seifert J, Thorson S (2001) The transformational potential of e-government: the role of political leadership. In 4th Pan European international relations conference, 8–11 September, 2001. University of Kent, UKGoogle Scholar
  14. Bouckaert G, Van de Walle S, Kampen JK (2005) Potential for comparative public opinion research in public administration. Int Rev Admin Sci 71(2):229–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown D (1999) Information systems for improved performance management: development approaches in US public agency. In: Heeks R (ed) Reinventing government in the information age. Routledge, New York, pp 321–330Google Scholar
  16. Carter L, Bélanger F (2005) The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Inf Syst J 15(1):5–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen KC, Wei KC, Chen Z (2003) Disclosure, corporate governance, and the cost of equity capital: evidence from Asia’s emerging markets. Corporate governance, and the cost of equity capital: evidence from Asia’s emerging markets. Retrieved from
  18. Choi H, Park MJ, Rho JJ, Zo H (2016) Rethinking the assessment of e-government implementation in developing countries from the perspective of the design–reality gap: applications in the Indonesian e-procurement system. Telecommun Policy 40(7):644–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Colesca SE (2009) Understanding trust in e-government. Inzinerine Ekon-Eng Econ 3(3):7–15Google Scholar
  20. Dalton RJ (2005) The social transformation of trust in government. Int Rev Sociol 15(1):133–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Das Aundhe M, Das Aundhe M, Narasimhan R, Narasimhan R (2016) Public private partnership (PPP) outcomes in e-government–a social capital explanation. Int J Public Sector Manag 29(7):638–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De Fine Licht J (2011) Do we really want to know? The potentially negative effect of transparency in decision making on perceived legitimacy. Scand Polit Stud 34(3), 183–201Google Scholar
  23. Edwards M (2015) The trust deficit—concepts and causes of low public trust in governments. Committee of Experts on Public Administration, Fourteenth session, 20–24 April 2015, Item 3 of the provisional agendaGoogle Scholar
  24. Fountain J (2001) Building the virtual state: information technology and institutional change. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC7Google Scholar
  25. Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Graham M, Avery EJ (2013) Government public relations and social media: an analysis of the perceptions and trends of social media use at the local government level. Public Relat J 7(4):1–21Google Scholar
  27. Gray R, Owen DL, Maunders K (1987) Corporate social reporting: accounting and accountability. Hemel Hempstead, Herts, Prentice-Hall InternationalGoogle Scholar
  28. Grimmelikhuijsen S (2009) Do transparent government agencies strengthen trust? Inf Polity 14(3):173–186Google Scholar
  29. Grimmelikhuijsen Stephan G (2012) A good man but a bad wizard: about the limits and future of transparency of democratic governments. Inf Polity 17(3–4):293–302Google Scholar
  30. Grimmelikhuijsen S, Porumbescu G, Hong B, Im T (2013) The effect of transparency on trust in government: a cross-national comparative experiment. Public Adm Rev 73(4):575–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gunawong P, Gao P (2017) Understanding e-government failure in the developing country context: a process-oriented study. Inf Technol Dev 23(1):153–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Babin BJ, Black WC (2010) Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective, vol 7. Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  33. Hameed S, Al-Shawabkah A (2013) Role of e-government in improving organizational performance in the civil status and passports department of Jordan. Developing Country Stud 3(5):50–64Google Scholar
  34. Hanna N (2009) e-Transformation: enabling new development strategies. Springer Science & Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  35. Hood Christopher (2006) Beyond exchanging first principles? some closing comments. In: Hood Christopher, Heald David (eds) Transparency: the key to better governance?. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 211–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Huse M (2005) Accountability and creating accountability: a framework for exploring behavioural perspectives of corporate governance. Br J Manag 16(s1):S65–S79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. International Labour Office (2015) World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2015. International Labour OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  38. International Labour Office (2016) World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2016. International Labour OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  39. International Labour Office (2017) World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2017. International Labour OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  40. ISEA (1999) Accountability 1000. Institute of Social and Ethical Accountability, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. Kim S, Kim HJ, Lee H (2009) An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: the case of OPEN. Gov Inf Q 26(1):42–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McNeal R, Hale K, Dotterweich L (2008) Citizen–government interaction and the Internet: expectations and accomplishments in contact, quality, and trust. J Inf Technol & Polit 5(2):213–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Moon MJ, Norris DF (2005) Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e-government at the municipal level. Inf Syst J 15(1):43–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Morgeson FV, Petrescu C (2011) Do they all perform alike? An examination of perceived performance, citizen satisfaction and trust with US federal agencies. Int Rev Admin Sci 77(3):451–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morgeson FV, VanAmburg D, Mithas S (2011) Misplaced trust? Exploring the structure of the e-government-citizen trust relationship. J Public Adm Res Theor 21(2):257–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mukhoryanova OA, Novikova IV, Rudich SB, Bogushevich EV (2016) E-government in the Western European Countries, Asia and in the USA. Indian J Sci Technol 9(16)Google Scholar
  47. Nam T (2012) Citizens’ attitudes toward open government and government 2.0. Int Rev Admin Sci 78(2):346–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Navarrete C (2010) Trust in e-government transactional services: a study of citizens’ perceptions in Mexico and the US. In 43rd Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS), 2010. IEEE, pp. 1–10Google Scholar
  49. Norquist G (2007) Transparency: the new democracy. Financial Times. Retrieved from
  50. Northrup TA, Thorson SJ (2003) The web of governance and democratic accountability. Proceedings of the 36th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciencesGoogle Scholar
  51. O’Neill Onora (2002) A question of trust: the BBC Reith Lectures 2002. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  52. Office Cabinet (2005) Transformational government. Cabinet Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  53. Omar A, Weerakkody V, Sivarajah U (2017) Digitally enabled service transformation in UK public sector: a case analysis of universal credit. Int J Inf Manage 37(4):350–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pina V, Torres L, Royo S (2009) E-government evolution in EU local governments: a comparative perspective. Online Inf Rev 33(6):1137–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Roberts Alasdair (2006) Governmental adaptation to transparency rules. In: Hood Christopher, Heald David (eds) Transparency: the key to better governance?. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 107–144Google Scholar
  56. Robinson JP, Shaver PR, Wrightsman LS (1991) Criteria for scale selection and evaluation. Meas Pers Soc Psychol Attitudes 1(3):1–16Google Scholar
  57. Roztocki N, Weistroffer HR (2016) Conceptualizing and researching the adoption of ICT and the impact on socioeconomic development. Inf Technol Dev 22(4):541–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sehli H, Cooper V, Sarkar P (2016) The role of culture in developing the e-government absorptive capacity of agencies in Saudi Arabia: a conceptual model. PACIS 2016 ProceedingsGoogle Scholar
  59. Seifert JW, Chung J (2009) Using e-government to reinforce government—citizen relationships: comparing government reform in the United States and China. Soc Sci Comput Rev 27(1):3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sekaran U (2000) Research Methods for Business: A Skill-building Approach. John Willey & Sons, USAGoogle Scholar
  61. Song C, Lee J (2013) Can social media restore citizen trust in government? Public Manag Res Conf. Madison, WI, pp 20–22Google Scholar
  62. Srivastava SC, Teo TS (2009) Citizen trust development for e-government adoption and usage: insights from young adults in Singapore. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 25Google Scholar
  63. Straub D, Boudreau MC, Gefen D (2004) Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 13:380–427Google Scholar
  64. Teo TS, Srivastava SC, Jiang L (2008) Trust and electronic government success: an empirical study. J Manag Inf Syst 25(3):99–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tolbert CJ, Mossberger K (2006) The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Adm Rev 66(3):354–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. United Nations (2012) E-government survey 2012: e-government for the people. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for Public Administration and Development ManagementGoogle Scholar
  67. United Nations (2014) E-government survey 2014: e-government for the future we want. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for Public Administration and Development ManagementGoogle Scholar
  68. United Nations (2016) E-government survey 2016: e-government in Support of Sustainable Development. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for Public Administration and Development ManagementGoogle Scholar
  69. Van de Walle S, Bouckaert G (2003) Public service performance and trust in government: the problem of causality. Int J Public Adm 26(8–9):891–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Van de Walle S, Van Roosbroek S, Bouckaert G (2008) Trust in the public sector: is there any evidence for a long-term decline? Int Rev Admin Sci 74(1):47–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Waller P, Weerakkody V (2016) Digital government: overcoming the systemic failure of transformation. Working Paper 2. Brunel University, LondonGoogle Scholar
  72. Al-Shafi S, Weerakkody, V. (2010) ‘Factors affecting e-government adoption in the state of Qatar’, Proceedings of the European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 12–13 April 2010Google Scholar
  73. Weerakkody V, Janssen M, Dwivedi Y (eds) (2009) Handbook of research on ICT enabled transformational government: a global perspective. Inf Sci Ref, Hershey, PAGoogle Scholar
  74. Welch EW, Hinnant CC, Moon MJ (2005) Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. J Public Adm Res Theor 15(3):371–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. West DM (2004) E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Adm Rev 64(1):15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Williams PF (1987) The legitimate concern with fairness. Acc Organ Soc 12(2):169–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. World Bank (2017) Digital governance projects database. Available at
  78. Zwahr T, Finger M, Müller P (2005) More than digitisation-the transformative potential of e-governance: an exploratory case study. In Proceedings of the 38th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 2005, HICSS’05. IEEE, pp 127–127Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brunel Business SchoolBrunel University LondonUxbridge, LondonUK

Personalised recommendations