Literature Review

  • Mohamed MahmoodEmail author
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)


Over the years, citizens’ trust and confidence in their governments has continued to decline and digital government is expected to reverse this trend. An enormous amount of money has been spent worldwide, on electronic government initiatives that are focused on improving performance, reducing costs and enhancing citizens' trust and confidence in their governments. Yet, of the many initiatives that have been implemented, very few have achieved real transformation of government (i.e. fundamental changes to the way core functions of government are performed to achieve noticeable gains in performance and efficiency). As such, there is a need to understand how transformation of government as a construct affects citizens’ trust and confidence in government in the presence of factors such as, government performance and citizen satisfaction. This research empirically investigates the influence of digital transformation of government on citizens’ trust and confidence in the context of the Kingdom of Bahrain. Bahrain is a top ranking country in terms of use of ICT in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region. A conceptual model was developed and validated using an online survey targeting randomly citizens of the Kingdom of Bahrain. Based on 313 responses, the findings of this research suggest that citizens' trust and confidence in their government is positively influenced by transformation of government, mediated by government performance and citizens’ satisfaction. The study found that e-government and technology are not enough for achieving a real transformation of government, and therefore, in tackling the decline in citizens’ trust and confidence in government. Other factors were found to be important in this equation, including transparency and accountability of government functions and activities in meeting citizens' expectations. The research offer multiple policy implications and theoretical contributions, in addition to helping understand how digital transformation of government can enhance citizens' trust and confidence in government, improve government-to-citizen relationship, and increase the adoption of digital services offered by governments. From a policy perspective, this research offers a validated conceptual model that can be used as a frame of reference when planning ICT-enabled transformation projects in government. From a theoretical context, this study is the first to investigate the relationship between transformation of government and citizens' trust and confidence in government.


Citizen Satisfaction Bahrain Citizen Trust Morgeson Weerakkody 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abramson P (1983) Political attitudes in America. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  2. Abu-Shanab E, Al-Azzam A (2012) Trust dimensions and the adoption of e-government in Jordan. International Journal of Information Communication Technologies and Human Development (IJICTHD) 4(1):39–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al Rub S (2006) The impact of information technology on business performance management (The study of the Affairs Agency of Sudanese working abroad for the period (2000–2005). Master’s thesis, University of Science and Technology, OmdurmanGoogle Scholar
  4. Albusaidy M, Weerakkody V (2008) Factors influencing e-government implementation progress in Oman: a discussion. In: Proceedings of the 2008 European and Mediterranean conference on information systemsGoogle Scholar
  5. Alharbi A, Kang K, Sohaib O (2016) Citizens engagement in e-participation on egovernment websites through swat model: a case of Saudi ArabiaGoogle Scholar
  6. Al-Khouri AM (2012) eGovernment strategies the case of the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Eur J ePractice 17:126–150Google Scholar
  7. Al-Shafi S, Weerakkody V (2008) The use of wireless internet parks to facilitate adoption and diffusion of e-government services: an empirical study in Qatar. In: AMCIS 2008 proceedings, p 322Google Scholar
  8. Al-Shafi S, Weerakkody V (2010) Factors affecting e-government adoption in the state of Qatar. In: Proceedings of the European and Mediterranean conference on information systems, Abu Dhabi, 12–13 Apr 2010Google Scholar
  9. Al-Shboul M, Rababah O, Ghnemat R, Al-Saqqa S (2014) Challenges and factors affecting the implementation of e-government in Jordan. J Soft Eng Appl 7(13):1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Al-Sobhi F, Weerakkody V, Kamal MM (2010) An exploratory study on the role of intermediaries in delivering public services in Madinah City: case of Saudi Arabia. Transforming Government. People, Process and Policy 4(1):14–36Google Scholar
  11. Amaliah Said I, Iaafar NH, Atan R (2015) Assessing accountability in government linked companies: an empirical evidence. Int Bus Manage 9(4):460–469Google Scholar
  12. Bannister F, Connolly R (2011) Trust and transformational government: a proposed framework for research. Gov Inf Quart 28(2):137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bean C (2015) Changing citizen confidence: orientations towards political and social institutions in Australia, 1983–2010. Open Polit Sci J 8(1):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bearden WO, Teal JE (1983) Selected determinants of consumer satisfaction and complaint reports. J Mark Res 20(1):21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bekkers, V., and Meijer, A. (2012) ‘A Meta-Theory of E-Government’, In 34th EGPA Conference ProceedingsGoogle Scholar
  16. Bélanger F, Carter L (2008) Trust and risk in e-government adoption. J Strateg Inf Syst 17(2):165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bonham G, Seifert J, Thorson S (2001) The transformational potential of e-Government: the role of political leadership. In 4th Pan European international relations conference, University of Kent, UK, Sep 2001Google Scholar
  18. Bouckaert G, Van de Walle S, Kampen JK (2005) Potential for comparative public opinion research in public administration. Int Rev Admin Sci 71(2):229–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bovens M, Wille A (2008) Deciphering the Dutch drop: ten explanations for decreasing political trust in The Netherlands. Int Rev Admin Sci 74(2):283–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cabinet Office (2005) Transformational government. Cabinet Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Cadotte ER, Woodruff RB, Jenkins RL (1987) Expectations and norms in models of consumer satisfaction. J Mark Res 24(3):305–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carter L, Bélanger F (2005) The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Inf Syst J 15(1):5–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Carter L, Weerakkody V (2008) E-government adoption: a cultural comparison. Inf Syst Front 10(4):473–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chan CML, Shan-Ling P, Tan C-W (2003) Managing stakeholder relationships in an e-government project. In: Ninth Americas conference on information systems, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  25. Chen KC, Wei KC, Chen Z (2003) Disclosure, corporate governance, and the cost of equity capital: evidence from Asia’s emerging markets. Retrieved from
  26. Churchill GA Jr, Surprenant C (1982) An investigation into the determinants of customer satisfaction. J Mark Res 19(4):491–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Colesca SE (2009) Understanding trust in e-government. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics 3(3):7–15Google Scholar
  28. Donnelly M, Wisniewski M, Dalrymple J, Curry A (1995) Measuring service quality in local government: the SERVQUAL approach. Int J Public Sector Manage 8:15–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Edwards M. (2015) The trust deficit—concepts and causes of low public trust in governments. In: Committee of Experts on Public Administration, Fourteenth session, 20–24 April 2015, Item 3 of the provisional agendaGoogle Scholar
  30. European Commission (2015) eGovernment in the European Union 2015Google Scholar
  31. Fornell C, Johnson MD, Anderson EW, Cha J, Bryant BE (1996) The American customer satisfaction index: nature, purpose and findings. J Mark 60(4):7–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fornell C, Mithas S, Morgeson III FV (2009a) Commentary—the economic and statistical significance of stock returns on customer satisfaction. Mark Sci 28:820–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fornell C, Mithas S, Morgeson III FV (2009b) The statistical significance of Portfolio returns. Int J Res Mark 26:162–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Freeman RE (2010) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  35. Fukuyama F (1995) Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Garcia-Murillo M (2013) Does a government web presence reduce perceptions of corruption? Inf Technol Dev 19(2):151–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gilbert D, Balestrini P (2004) Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e-government. Int J Public Sect Manage 17(4):286–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gilmour P, Coffey B, O’Toole K (2015) Trust and knowledge exchange in coastal settings. Aust J Marit Ocean Aff 7(1):66–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Grimmelikhuijsen S (2009) Do transparent government agencies strengthen trust? Inf Polity 14(3):173–186Google Scholar
  40. Gunawong P, Gao P (2017) Understanding e-government failure in the developing country context: a process-oriented study. Inf Technol Dev 23(1):153–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hameed S, Al-Shawabkah A (2013) Role of e-government in improving organizational performance in the civil status and passports department of Jordan. Dev Country Stud 3(5):50–64Google Scholar
  42. Hess AM, Hess MF (2016) The consequences of governance failure for innovation. In: Working paper. Washington and Lee UniversityGoogle Scholar
  43. Hiller JS, Belanger F (2001) Privacy strategies for electronic government. E-government series. The PricewaterhouseCoopers Endowment for the Business of Government. Available at
  44. Hirschman AO (1970) Exit, voice, and loyalty: responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states, vol 25. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  45. Hong H (2013) Government websites and social media’s influence on government-public relationships. Public Relat Rev 39(4):346–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hudson J (2006) Institutional trust and subjective well-being across the EU. Kyklos 59(1):43–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. International Labour Office (2015) World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2015. International Labour OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  48. International Labour Office (2016) World Employment and Social Outlook: trends 2016. International Labour OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  49. International Labour Office (2017) World Employment and Social Outlook: trends 2017. International Labour OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  50. James O (2009) Evaluating the expectations disconfirmation and expectations anchoring approaches to citizen satisfaction with local public services. J Public Adm Res Theor 19(1):107–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Janssen M, Shu W (2008) Transformational government: basics and key issues: a workshop. In: Proceedings of ICEGOV 2008. Cairo, Dec 2008, pp 117–122Google Scholar
  52. Job J (2005) How is trust in government created? It begins at home, but ends in the parliament. Aust Rev Public Aff 6(1):1–23Google Scholar
  53. Kampen JK, Maddens B, Vermunt JK, Salminen A (2003) Trust and satisfaction: a case study of the micro-performance. In: Salminen A (ed) Governing networks: networks: EGPA yearbook. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 319–326Google Scholar
  54. Kampen JK, De Walle SV, Bouckaert G (2006) Assessing the relation between satisfaction with public service delivery and trust in government. The impact of the predisposition of citizens toward government on evaluations of its performance. Public Perform Manage Rev 29(4):387–404Google Scholar
  55. Khalil OE (2011) e-Government readiness: does national culture matter? Gov Inf Quart 28(3):388–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Khan A (2016) Central Bank governance and the role of nonfinancial risk management. In: Working Paper. International Monetary FundGoogle Scholar
  57. Kim S, Kim HJ, Lee H (2009) An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: the case of OPEN. Gov Inf Quart 26(1):42–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lai Y-L, Cao L, Zhao JS (2010) The impact of political entity on confidence in legal authorities: a comparison between China and Taiwan. J Crim Justice 38(5):934–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Layne K, Lee J (2001) Developing fully functional e-government. Gov Inf Quart 18(2):122–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lee J (2007) Search for stage theory in e-government development. Innovation Public Sect 13:33–48Google Scholar
  61. Maddox W, Lilie S (1984) Beyond liberal and conservative. Cato Institute, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  62. Mahmood M (2016) Enhancing citizens’ trust and confidence in government through digital transformation. Int J Electron Gov Res 12(1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mahmood, Weerakkody (2014) Digital government diffusion in Bahrain—the role of trust and its influence on adoption. In: Proceedings of the European, Mediterranean & Middle Eastern conference on information systems, 2014Google Scholar
  64. McNeal R, Hale K, Dotterweich L (2008) Citizen–government interaction and the internet: expectations and accomplishments in contact, quality, and trust. J Inf Technol Polit 5(2):213–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Meijer AJ, Koops BJ, Pieterson W, Overman S, Tije S (2012) Government 2.0: key challenges to its realization. Electron J e-Government 10(1):59–69Google Scholar
  66. Moon MJ, Norris DF (2005) Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e-government at the municipal level. Inf Syst J 15(1):43–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Morgeson FV, Petrescu C (2011) Do they all perform alike? An examination of perceived performance, citizen satisfaction and trust with US federal agencies. Int Rev Admin Sci 77(3):451–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Morgeson FV, VanAmburg D, Mithas S (2011) Misplaced trust? Exploring the structure of the e-government-citizen trust relationship. J Public Adm Res Theor 21(2):257–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mungiu-Pippidi A, Dadašov R, Fazekas M, Tóth IJ, Kocsis G, Jancsis D, Kortas AM, Kukutschka RMB, Stefavov R, Skolkay A (2016) Public integrity and trust in EuropeGoogle Scholar
  70. Myeong S, Kwon Y, Seo H (2014) Sustainable e-governance: the relationship among trust, digital divide, and e-government. Sustainability 6(9):6049–6069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Nam T (2012) Citizens’ attitudes toward open government and government 2.0. Int Rev Admin Sci 78(2):346–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Navarrete C (2010) Trust in e-government transactional services: a study of citizens’ perceptions in Mexico and the US. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 2010. IEEE, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  73. Norquist G (2007) Transparency: the new democracy. Financial Times. Retrieved from
  74. Nye J (1997) In government we don’t trust. Foreign Policy 108:99–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Nye J, Zelikow P, King D (1997) Why people don’t trust government. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  76. Oliver RL (1980) A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J Mark Res 17:460–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Omar A, Weerakkody V, Sivarajah U (2017) Digitally enabled service transformation in UK public sector: a case analysis of universal credit. Int J Inf Manage 37(4):350–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. O’Neill R (2009) The transformative impact of e-government on public governance in New Zealand. Public Manage Rev 11(6):751–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Orlikowski WJ (1992) The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ Sci 3(3):398–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Orlikowski WJ (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ Sci 11(4):404–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Orlikowski WJ, Yates J, Okamura K, Fujimoto M (1995) Shaping electronic communication: the metastructuring of technology in the context of use. Organ Sci 6(4):423–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Orren G (1997) Fall from grace: the public’s loss of faith in government. In: Nye J Jr, Zelikow P, King D (eds) Why people don’t trust government. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  83. Osman IH, Anouze A, Irani Z, Lee H, Balcı A, Medeni T, Weerakkody V (2011) A new cobras framework to evaluate e-government services: a citizen centric perspective. In: Tgovernment workshopGoogle Scholar
  84. Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL (1988) SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J Retail 64(1):12–40Google Scholar
  85. Parasuraman A, Berry LL, Zeithaml VA (1991) Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. J Retail 67:420–450Google Scholar
  86. Pardo TA, Scholl HJ (2002) Walking atop the cliffs: avoiding failure and avoiding risk in large scale e-government projects. In: Hawai’i international conference on system sciencesGoogle Scholar
  87. Peters BG (1999) American public policy: promise and performance, 5th edn. Chatham House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  88. Pina V, Torres L, Royo S (2009) E-government evolution in EU local governments: a comparative perspective. Online Inf Rev 33(6):1137–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Poister TH, Henry GT (1994) Citizen ratings of public and private service quality: a comparative perspective. Public Adm Rev 54(2):155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Rodrigues G, Sarabdeen J, Balasubramanian S (2016) Factors that influence consumer adoption of e-government services in the UAE: a UTAUT model perspective. J Internet Commer 15(1):18–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Salmi M, Hasnan N (2016) E-Government technology acceptance analysis of citizens: sultanate of Oman case. Int J Soc Relevance Concern 4(1):13–26Google Scholar
  92. Sargeant A, Lee S (2002) Improving public trust in the voluntary sector: an empirical analysis. Int J Nonprofit Voluntary Sect Mark 7(1):68–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Scharpf F (1999) Governing in Europe: effective and democratic. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Scholl HJ (2001) Applying stakeholder theory to e-government. In: Schmidt B, Stanoevska-Slabeva K, Tschammer V (eds) Towards the e-society: e-commerce, e-business and e-government. Kluwer Academic Publishers, NorwellGoogle Scholar
  95. Scott M, Golden W, Hughes M (2004) The implementation of citizen-centred e-government: a stakeholder viewpoint. In: Working paper. Centre for Innovation & Structural Change, National University of Ireland, GalwayGoogle Scholar
  96. Seifert JW, Chung J (2009) Using e-government to reinforce government—citizen relationships: comparing government reform in the United States and China. Soc Sci Comput Rev 27(1):3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Shafi AS, Weerakkody V (2009) Understanding citizens’ behavioural intention in the adoption of e-government services in the state of Qatar. In: ECIS, pp 1618–1629Google Scholar
  98. Sharma SK, Govindaluri SM, Gattoufi S (2015) Understanding and predicting the quality determinants of e-government services: a two-staged regression-neural network model. J Model Manage 10(3):325–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Siau K, Long Y (2005) Synthesizing e-government stage models—a meta-synthesis based on meta-ethnography approach. Ind Manage Data Syst 105(4):443–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Siddique W (2016) Critical success factors affecting e-government policy implementation in Pakistan. JeDEM-eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government 8(1):102–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Song C, Lee J (2013) Can social media restore citizen trust in government? In: Public management research conference. Madison, pp 20–22Google Scholar
  102. Srivastava SC, Teo TS (2009) Citizen trust development for e-government adoption and usage: insights from young adults in Singapore. In: Communications of the association for information systems, vol 25Google Scholar
  103. Tennert JR, Schroeder AD (1999) Stakeholder Analysis. In: Paper presented at the 60th annual meeting of the American society for public administration, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  104. Teo TS, Srivastava SC, Jiang L (2008) Trust and electronic government success: an empirical study. J Manage Inf Syst 25(3):99–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Tolbert CJ, Mossberger K (2006) The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Adm Rev 66(3):354–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. United Nations (2012) E-government survey 2012: e-government for the people. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for Public Administration and Development ManagementGoogle Scholar
  107. United Nations (2014) E-government survey 2014: e-government for the future we want. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for Public Administration and Development ManagementGoogle Scholar
  108. United Nations (2016) E-government survey 2016: e-government in support of sustainable development. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for Public Administration and Development ManagementGoogle Scholar
  109. Uslaner EM (2001) Is Washington really the problem? In: Hibbing JR, Thesis-Morse E (eds) What is it about government that americans dislike? Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  110. Van de Walle S, Bouckaert G (2003) Public service performance and trust in government: the problem of causality. Int J Public Adm 26(8–9):891–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Van de Walle S, Van Roosbroek S, Bouckaert G (2008) Trust in the public sector: is there any evidence for a long-term decline? Int Rev Admin Sci 74(1):47–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Van Ryzin GG, Muzzio D, Immerwahr S, Gulick L, Martinez E (2004) Drivers and consequences of citizen satisfaction: an application of the American customer satisfaction index model to New York City. Public Adm Rev 64(3):331–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Waller P, Weerakkody V (2016) Digital government: overcoming the systemic failure of transformation. In Working paper 2. Brunel University, LondonGoogle Scholar
  114. Weerakkody V, Janssen M, Dwivedi Y (eds) (2009) Handbook of research on ICT enabled transformational government: a global perspective. Information Science Reference, HersheyGoogle Scholar
  115. Weerakkody V, El-Haddadeh R, Al-Sobhi F, Shareef MA, Dwivedi YK (2013) Examining the influence of intermediaries in facilitating e-government adoption: an empirical investigation. Int J Inf Manage 33(5):716–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Weerakkody V, Omar A, El-Haddadeh R (2016) Digitally-enabled service transformation in the public sector: the lure of institutional pressure and strategic response towards change. Gov Inf Quart 33(4):658–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Welch EW, Hinnant CC, Moon MJ (2005) Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. J Public Adm Res Theor 15(3):371–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. West DM (2004) E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Adm Rev 64(1):15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Wolak J, Palus CK (2010) The dynamics of public confidence in US state and local government. State Polit Policy Quart 10(4):421–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. World Bank (2010) Results, performance budgeting and trust in government. WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  121. Yamin M, Mattar R (2016) e-Government in Saudi Arabia—an empirical study. BVICAM’s Int J Inf Technol 8(1):944–949Google Scholar
  122. Zouridis S, Thaens M (2003) E-government: towards a public administration approach. Asian J Public Adm 25(2):159–183Google Scholar
  123. Zwahr T, Finger M, Müller P (2005) More than digitisation-The transformative potential of e-governance: an exploratory case study. In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2005, HICSS’05. IEEE, p 127Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brunel Business SchoolBrunel University LondonUxbridge, LondonUK

Personalised recommendations