Skip to main content

Control Environment, Risk Assessment and Monitoring in United Arab Emirates Businesses

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Creative Business and Social Innovations for a Sustainable Future

Abstract

The objective of this study reflects an atmosphere conducive to the effective operation of the accounting information system and control activities in UAE business. An empirical survey using a questionnaire was carried out to achieve this objective. The case study taken into analyses is based on one hundred valid questionnaires were randomly distributed to different types of UAE businesses and subsequently collected. The collected data were analyzed using the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 12 the survey results revealed a significant positive relationship within the variables: 1. Management Philosophy and Operating Style, 2. Organization Structure, 3. Methods of assigning authority and responsibility, 4. Board of Directors integrity and Ethical Values, Commitment to Competence, 5. Human Resource Policies and procedures, 6. Risk Assessment, and 7. Monitoring. The results also revealed that the applicable Control Environment, Risk Assessment and Monitoring Auditing of this paper. The results of the study will enable accountants and others in the profession to foresee risk assessments and monitoring internal audit for the success of businesses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Whittington, O., Pany, K.: Principles of Auditing and Other Assurance Services. McGraw-Hill, Boston (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Avens, A.A., et al.: Auditing and Assurance Services, 16th edn., p. 382. Pearson (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marshall, K.: Internal control and derivatives. CPA J. 65(10), 46 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crawford, D.: Levels of control. Intern. Auditor 57(5), 42 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Graves, S., Longenecker, B., Marsh, T., Milstead, H.: Evaluating internal controls: control self-assessment in government. Government Finance Review 19(3), 40 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hubbard, L.: The importance of ethics. Intern. Auditor 59(1), 57 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Myers, N.I.: Contractor internal control—more than you think. J. Constr. Acc. Taxation 12(2), 25 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Singleton, T.: Stop fraud cold with powerful internal controls. J. Corp. Acc. Finan. 13(4), 29 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gauthier, S.: Understanding internal control. Gov. Fin. Rev. 22(1), 10 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ramos, M.: Just how effective is your internal control? J. Corp. Acc. Finan. 15(6), 29 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huen, N., Aslanidis, T.: Outsourcing and internal control: know where you stand. CMA Manag. 80(4), 15 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Davies, J., Haubenstock, M.: Building effective indicators to monitor operational risk. RMA J. 84(8), 40 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sobel, P.: Building on section 404. Intern. Auditor 63(2), 38 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chapman, C.: Bringing ERM into focus. Intern. Auditor 60(3), 30 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bradford, M.: Framework offers guidance on ERM; Enterprise risk tools. Bus. Insur. 37(31), 4 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moody, M.: ERM takes another step forward. Rough Notes 146(10), 74 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Harkness, M., Green, B.: E-commerce’s impact on audit practices. Intern. Auditing 19(2), 28 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hirte, B., et al.: Smart auditing. Intern. Auditor 52(2), 38 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Matyjewicz, G., D’Arcangelo, J.: Beyond Sarbanes-Oxley. Intern. Auditor 61(5), 67 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schanfield, A., Miller, M.: A sustainable approach to ERM. Intern. Auditor 62(2), 79 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Paddock, J., Spayd, J.: How to survive a customs audit. Logistics Manag. 44(10), 45 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shenkir, W., Walker, P.: Enterprise risk management and the strategy risk focused organization’. Cost Manag. 20(3), 32 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Elliott, R.: The future of assurance services: implications for academia. Acc. Horiz. 9(4), 118–127 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, E.: What is internal control environment? Retrieved from http://www.carrtegra.com/2016/04/internal-control-environment/ (2016)

  25. Pickett, K.H.S.: The Essential Guide Internal Auditing, p. 109. Wiley (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Protiviti.: The update COSO internal control. Retrieved from https://www.protiviti.com/sites/default/files/united_states/insights/updated-coso-internal-control-framework-faqs-third-edition-protiviti.pdf (2014)

  27. Kaplan, R., Norton, D.: The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hikmat AlRawi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Questionnaire

Appendix: Questionnaire

Control environment, risk assessment and monitoring

Position:

Low Mgt.

Middle Mgt.

Top Mgt.

Years in service:

5–10

11–15

16–20

21–25

26–30

Qualification (degree):

High School

Bachelor

Master

CPA

Ph.D.

1. Management Philosophyand Operating Style

Low 20%

40%

60%

80%

High 100%

1. Does Management adequately consider the potential effect of taking large or unusual business risks prior to doing so?

     

2. Are business risks adequately monitored?

     

3. Is management not overly aggressive with respect to financial reporting?

     

4. Are Financial statement estimates developed in a conscientious manner?

     

2. Organization Structure

Low 20%

40%

60%

80%

High 100%

5. Is the organization of the entity clearly defined in terms of lines of authority and responsibility?

     

6. Does the entity have a current organizational chart and related material such as job descriptions?

     

7. Are policies and procedures for authorization of transaction established at an adequately high level?

     

8. Are such Policies and procedures adequately adhered to?

     

3. Methods of assigning authority and responsibility

Low 20%

40%

60%

80%

High 100%

9. Are authority and responsibility to deal with organizational goals and objectives, operating functions and regulatory requirement adequately delegated?

     

10. Has Management established communicated policies about appropriate business practices and conduct and conflicts of interest?

     

11. Has the entity developed an It system documentation that indicates the procedures for authorizing transactions and approving systems changes

     

4. Board of Directors integrity and ethical Values, Commitment to Competence

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

12. is the level of experience, status and independence of the members of the board of directors appropriate for the organization

     

13. Are there regular meetings of the board of directors to set policies and objectives, review the entity’s performance and take appropriate action and are minutes of such meetings prepared and signed on a timely basis?

     

14. Has Management taken adequate action to reduce incentives and temptations that might prompt employees to engage in dishonest, illegal and unethical Acts?

     

15. Does Management exhibit an adequate commitment to competence in the performance of essential jobs within the organization?

     

5. Human Resource Policies And procedures

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

16. Does the entity employ sound practices, including background investigations, where appropriate?

     

17. Are employees adequately trained to meet their Job responsibilities?

     

18. Is employee performance evaluated at regular intervals?

     

19. Are employee in positions of trust bonded?

     

20. Are employee in positions of trust required to take vacations and their duties rotated while they are on vacation?

     

6. Risk Assessment

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

21. Is the chief executive officer attuned to external factor that affect the risk of achieving the entity’s objectives?

     

22. Is the chief executive officer attuned to internal factor that affect the risk of achieving the entity’s objectives?

     

7. Monitoring

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

23. Are key Management personnel sufficiently involved with operations to monitor the effectiveness of internal controls?

     

24. Does management have a formal process for considering reportable conditions from external auditors?

     

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

AlRawi, H., Mosteanu, N.R., Alrawi, I.H. (2019). Control Environment, Risk Assessment and Monitoring in United Arab Emirates Businesses. In: Mateev, M., Poutziouris, P. (eds) Creative Business and Social Innovations for a Sustainable Future. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01662-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics