Advertisement

The Power of EMPs: Educational Multimedia Projects

  • Rab PatersonEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter highlights the pedagogical approach taken by the author in his teaching, both at secondary school and university undergraduate level. It begins with an overview of how a variety of digital approaches to teaching such as technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge (TPACK) were developed. Next, this section then explores these approaches such as flipped learning and blog journaling in detail by examining their strengths and weaknesses and which apps the author suggests they be used with. The apps used are also briefly explained along with an explanation of the Substitution Augmentation Modification Redefinition (SAMR) process used to evaluate the apps in the first place. With this background finished, the chapter then highlights the actual Educational Multimedia Projects work done by the author by looking at the specific projects undertaken by liberal arts undergraduate university students in Japan and the reactions of the students. This chapter concludes with the lessons learned from this action research approach taken by the author as the student reactions to this type of approach were overwhelmingly positive.

Keywords

Twenty-first-century learning Challenge-based learning Digital literacy and pedagogy Multimedia learning Project-based learning 

References

  1. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 369–398.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brookhouser, K. (2015). The 20Time project: How educators can launch Google’s formula for future-ready innovation (R. Megnin, Ed., 1st ed.). San Bernardino, CA: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.Google Scholar
  3. Dewey, J. (1997). Experience and education (Reprint ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. Duarte, N. (2008). Slide:Ology: The art and science of creating great presentations (1st ed.). Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar
  5. Duarte, N. (2010). Resonate: Present visual stories that transform audiences. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Dwyer, D. C., Ringstaff, C., Haymore, J., & Sandholtz, P. D. (1994). Apple classrooms of tomorrow. Educational Leadership, 51(7), 4–10.Google Scholar
  7. Educational Psychology & Instructional Technology. (n.d.). Retrieved May 13, 2018, from http://www.coe.uga.edu/epit/
  8. Gray, A. (n.d.). The 10 skills you need to thrive in the fourth industrial revolution. Retrieved May 14, 2018, from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-10-skills-you-need-to-thrive-in-the-fourth-industrial-revolution/
  9. Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., et al. (2004). Scientific teaching. Science, 304(5670), 521–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning (1st ed.). London, UK/New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson, L. F., Smith, R. S., Smythe, J. T., & Varon, R. K. (2009). Challenge-based learning: An approach for our time. New Media Consortium. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED505102
  13. Jones, R. H., & Hafner, C. A. (2012). Understanding digital literacies: A practical introduction. Milton Park/Abingdon/Oxon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Khan Academy. (n.d.). Retrieved September 24, 2013, from http://www.khanacademy.org
  15. Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2007). A new literacies sampler. New York, NY: P. Lang.Google Scholar
  16. Kress, G. R. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Lambert, C. (2012, March–April). Twilight of the lecture. Harvard Magazine. Retrieved from http://harvardmagazine.com/2012/03/twilight-of-the-lecture
  18. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2008). Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  19. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK/New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lesson Plans – Search Education – Google. (n.d.). Retrieved May 16, 2018, from https://www.google.com/intl/en-us/insidesearch/searcheducation/lessons.html
  21. Lewis, D., & Allan, B. (2004). Virtual learning communities – A guide for practioners. New York, NY: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lockley, T. (2011). Japanese students’ experience of ICT and other technology prior to university: A survey. The JALT CALL Journal, 7(1), 93–102.Google Scholar
  23. Marino, M. T., Sameshima, P., & Beecher, C. C. (2009). Enhancing TPACK with assistive technology. Retrieved May 13, 2010, from http://www.citejournal.org/vol9/iss2/general/article1.cfm
  24. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimédia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Medina, J. (2011). Brain rules: 12 principles for surviving and thriving at work, home and school. Brunswick, Australia: Scribe Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Zhao, Y. (2007). Faculty development by design: Integrating technology in higher education. Charlotte, NC: IAP.Google Scholar
  28. Moon, J. (2003). Learning journals and logs, reflective diaries. In Centre for teaching and learning good practice in teaching and learning (pp. 1–29). University of Exeter.Google Scholar
  29. Murray, A., & Blyth, A. (2011). A survey of Japanese university students’ computer literacy levels. JALT CALL Journal, 7(3), 307–318.Google Scholar
  30. Nicosia, L. M. (2013). Educators online: Preparing today’s teachers for tomorrow’s digital literacies. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  31. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Project-Based Learning. (n.d.). Retrieved January 16, 2014, from http://www.edutopia.org/project-based-learning
  33. Puentedura, R. R. (2013). Ruben R. Puentedura’s Weblog. Retrieved April 30, 2018, from http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/
  34. Reynolds, G. (2008). Presentation zen: Simple ideas on presentation design and delivery (1st ed.). Berkeley, CA: New Riders Press.Google Scholar
  35. Reynolds, G. (2009). Presentation zen: The video [DVD]. Berkeley, CA: New Riders Press.Google Scholar
  36. Reynolds, G. (2010). The naked presenter: Delivering powerful presentations with or without slides (1st ed.). Berkeley, CA: New Riders Press.Google Scholar
  37. Rogers, E. M., & Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  38. Sharpe, R., Beetham, H., Freitas, S. de, (2010). Rethinking Learning for a Digital Age: How Learners are Shaping their Own Experiences, (1st ed.). NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shaw, J. (2013, March). The expanded classroom: The impact of technology in a connected world. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/JonathanShaw2/cu-expanding-classroominted2013final
  40. Thorne, S. L., & Reinhardt, J. (2008). “Bridging activities,” new media literacies, and advanced foreign language proficiency. Calico Journal, 25(3), 558–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Warlick, D. (2006). Curriculum is dead [2 Cents Worth]. Retrieved from http://2cents.onlearning.us/?p=420

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Toyo UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations