Tablets in Learning Mathematics for Kindergarten Students

  • Nicholas ZaranisEmail author
  • Vasiliki Valla


The aim of this study is to explore the impact on kindergarten children’s mathematical competence after the implementation of a software application for comparison, classification, one-to-one correspondence, and counting with tablet computers. The application consisted of some comparison, classification, one-to-one correspondence, and counting activities, designed following the background of realistic mathematics education and more specifically that of the learning teaching trajectory for the domain of mathematics. Four kindergarten schools of Heraklion participated in the study, which was conducted during spring 2017. The research followed the pre-test and post-test model, using the Early Numeracy Test (ENT), an instrument measuring the early mathematical competence. The test comprises of questions for the concepts of comparison, classification, one-to-one correspondence, seriation, using counting words, structured counting, resultative counting, and general knowledge of numbers. The results of the study support a positive correlation between children’s early numeracy competence and the integration of tablet computers in teaching and learning numbers.


Mathematics Tablet computers Kindergarten Early numeracy test 



This work was supported by the Research Committee of the University of Crete (ELKE)


  1. Biancarosa, G., & Griffiths, G. G. (2012). Technology tools to support reading in the digital age. The Future of Children, 22, 139–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bobis, J., Clarke, B., Clarke, D., Thomas, G., Wright, R., Young-Loveridge, J., et al. (2005). Supporting teachers in the development of young children’s mathematical thinking: Three large scale cases. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 16(3), 27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brooker, L., & Siraj-Blatchford, J. (2002). ‘Click on Miaow!’: How children of three and four years experience the nursery computer. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 3(2), 251–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Calder, N. (2015). Apps: Appropriate, applicable, and appealing?. In T. Lowrie, R. Jorgensen (Zevenbergen) (Eds.), Digital games and mathematics learning (Mathematics education in the digital era 4, pp. 233–250). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, J., & Chang, C. (2006). Using computers in early childhood classrooms: Teachers’ attitudes, skills and practices. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 4(2), 169–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiong, C., & Shuler, C. (2010). Learning: Is there an app for that? Investigations of young children’s usage and learning with mobile devices and apps. New York: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.Google Scholar
  7. Clements, D. H. (1999). Playing math with young children. Curriculum Administrator, 35(4), 25–28.Google Scholar
  8. Clements, D. H. (2002). Computers in early childhood mathematics. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 3(2), 160–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2004). Building blocks for early childhood mathematics. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2013). Rethinking early mathematics: What is research based curriculum for young children? In L. D. English & J. T. Mulligan (Eds.), Reconceptualizing early mathematics learning (pp. 121–147). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cochrane, T., Narayan, V., & Oldfield, J. (2013). iPadagogy: Appropriating the iPad within pedagogical contexts. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 7(1), 48–65. Scholar
  12. Desoete, A., Ceulemans, A., De Weerdt, F., & Pieters, S. (2010). Can we predict mathematical learning disabilities from symbolic and non-symbolic comparison tasks in kindergarten? Findings from a longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 64–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dimakos, G., & Zaranis, N. (2010). The influence of the Geometer’s Sketchpad on the geometry achievement of Greek school students. The Teaching of Mathematics, 13(2), 113–124. Retrieved March 29, 2011,
  14. Dissanayake, S. N., Karunananda, A. S., & Lekamge, G. D. (2007). Use of computer technology for the teaching of primary school mathematics. OUSL Journal, 4, 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Falloon, G. (2013). Young students using iPads: App design and content influences on their learning pathways. Computers & Education, 68, 505–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fesakis, G., & Kafoussi, S. (2009, July 19–24). Kindergarten children capabilities in combinatorial problems using computer microworlds and manipulatives. In The Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the IGPME (PME33) (Vol. 3, pp. 41–48). Thessaloniki, Greece, in Greek.Google Scholar
  17. Fischer, M. A., & Gillespie, C. W. (2003). Computers and young children’s development. Young Children, 58(4), 85–91.Google Scholar
  18. Fokides, E., & Atsikpasi, P. (2017). Tablets in education. Results from the initiative ETiE, for teaching plants to primary school students. Education and Information Technologies, 22(5), 2545–2563. Scholar
  19. Fokides, E., & Mastrokoukou, A. (2018). Human anatomy, tablets, and primary school students. Results from a pilot study. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(2), 154–170. Scholar
  20. Ginsburg, H. P., & Baroody, A. J. (2003). The test of early mathematics ability (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  21. Haugland, S. (1999). What role should technology play in young children’s learning? Young Children, 54(9), 26–30.Google Scholar
  22. Henderson, S., & Yeow, J. (2012). iPad in education: A case study of iPad adoption and use in a primary school. In Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference in System Science (hicss) (pp. 78–87). IEEE.Google Scholar
  23. Howie, S., & Blignaut, A. S. (2009). South Africa’s readiness to integrate ICT into mathematics and science pedagogy in secondary schools. Education and Information Technologies, 14, 345–363. Scholar
  24. Judge, S. (2005). The impact of computer technology on academic achievement of young African American children. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 20(2), 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kroesbergen, H., Van de Rijt, B. A. M., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2007). Working memory and early mathematics: Possibilities for early identification of mathematics learning disabilities. Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, 20, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kucirkova, N. (2014). iPads in early education: Separating assumptions and evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(715), 1–3.Google Scholar
  27. Larkin, K. (2013). Mathematics education: Is there an app for that? In V. Steinle, L. Ball, & C. Bardini (Eds.), Mathematics education: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA-36) (pp. 426–433). Melbourne, Australia: MERGA.Google Scholar
  28. Larkin, K. (2015). “An app! An app! My kingdom for an app”: An 18-month quest to determine whether apps support mathematical knowledge building. In T. Lowrie, R. Jorgensen (Zevenbergen) (Eds.), Digital games and mathematics learning (Mathematics education in the digital era 4, pp. 251–276). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
  29. Larkin, K., & Calder, N. (2016). Mathematics education and mobile technologies. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(1), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee, Y. (2009). Pre-K children’s interaction with educational software programs: An observation of capabilities and levels of engagement. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 18(3), 289–309.Google Scholar
  31. Lieberman, D. A., Bates, C. H., & So, J. (2009). Young children’s learning with digital media. Computers in the Schools, 26, 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu, N. S. H. (2013). iPad infuse creativity in solid geometry teaching. Turkish Online Journal of Education Technology., 12, 177–192.Google Scholar
  33. Mango, O. (2015). Ipad use and student engagement in the classroom. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14, 53–57.Google Scholar
  34. McManis, L. D., & Gunnewig, S. B. (2012). Finding the education in educational technology with early learners. YC Young Children, 67, 14–24.Google Scholar
  35. Moore-Russo, D., Diletti, J., Strzelec, J., Reeb, C., Schillace, J., Martin, A., et al. (2015). A study of how angry birds has been used in mathematics education. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 1(2–3), 107–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Norris, C., Hossain, A., & Soloway, E. (2012). Under what conditions does computer use positively impact student achievement? Supplemental vs. essential use. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of SITE 2012—Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2021–2028). Austin, TX: AACE.Google Scholar
  37. Orlando, J., & Attard, C. (2016). Digital natives come of age: The reality of today’s early career teachers using mobile devices to teach mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(1), 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2016). Improving mathematics teaching in kindergarten with realistic mathematical education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45, 369–378. Scholar
  39. Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2018). Educational apps from the Android Google Play for Greek preschoolers: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 116(2018), 139–160. Scholar
  40. Pelton, T., & Francis Pelton, L. (2012). Building mobile apps to support sense-making in mathematics. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 4426–4431). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
  41. Pitchford, N. (2014). Unlocking talent: Evaluation of a tablet-based masamu intervention in a Malawian primary school. Nottingham, UK: University of Nottingham Report. Retrieved January 12, 2016, from
  42. Rikala, J., Vesisenaho, M., & Mylläri, J. (2013). Actual and potential pedagogical use of tablets in schools. Human Technology: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments, 9(2), 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Risconscente, M. (2012). Mobile learning games improves 5th graders’ fraction knowledge and attitudes. Los Angeles: GameDesk Institute.Google Scholar
  44. Schacter, J., & Jo, B. (2017). Improving preschoolers’ mathematics achievement with tablets: A randomized controlled trial. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 1–15.Google Scholar
  45. Shamir, H., Feehan, K., & Yoder, E. (2017). Does CAI improve early math skills?. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2017) (Vol. 2, pp. 285–292). Porto, Portugal.Google Scholar
  46. Shuler, C., Levine, Z., & Ree, J. (2012). iLearn II: An analysis of the education category of Apple’s app store. New York: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.Google Scholar
  47. Starkey, P., Klein, A., & Wakeley, A. (2004). Enhancing young children’s mathematical knowledge through a pre-kindergarten mathematics intervention. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, Elsevier, 19, 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Trouche, L., & Drijvers, P. (2010). Handheld technology for mathematics education: Flashback into the future. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42(7), 667–681. Scholar
  49. Vale, C., & Leder, G. (2004). Student views of computer-based mathematics in the middle years: Does gender make a difference? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56, 287–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Walcott, C., Mohr, D., & Kastberg, S. E. (2009). Making sense of shape: An analysis of children’s written responses. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28, 30–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weiss, I., Kramarski, B., & Talis, S. (2006). Effects of multimedia environments on kindergarten children’s mathematical achievements and style of learning. Educational Media International, 43(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zaranis, N. (2018). Comparing the effectiveness of using tablets computers for teaching addition and subtraction. In L. Daniela & M. Lytras (Eds.), Learning strategies and constructionism in modern education settings (pp. 131–151). Hershey, PA: IGI Global, ISBN (13): 9781522554301.Google Scholar
  53. Zaranis, N., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2011, September 15–17). Greek primary students’ attitudes towards the use of ICT for teaching natural sciences. In M. F. Costa, B. V. Dorrío, & S. Divjak, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Hands-on Science (pp. 50–55). Ljubljana, Slovenia: University of Ljubljana.Google Scholar
  54. Zaranis, N., Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. (2013). Using mobile devices for teaching realistic mathematics in kindergarten education. Creative Education, 4, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zaranis, N., & Oikonomidis, V. (2009). ICT in preschool education. Athens, Greece: Grigoris Publications in Greek.Google Scholar
  56. Zaranis, Ν., & Valla, V. (2017, July 3–5). Tablet computer assisted counting and calculating activities for kindergarten children. In L. Gómez Chova, A. López Martínez, & I. Candel Torres (Eds.), EDULEARN17 Proceedings, 9th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (pp. 9680–9689). Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Preschool EducationUniversity of CreteRethymnoGreece

Personalised recommendations