Abstract
Intensified contradictions between Russian state and private media have the serious consequences related to the fragmentation of the agenda. Each media pursues its own purposes in agenda setting which determine their strategies regarding the audience concern. Our hypotheses were that the private media would follow the interests of their audience in agenda-setting, and the state ones, on the contrary, would ignore them. To test out hypotheses we decided to measure the media and public agenda in social media because on these platforms there was the opportunity to study both of them. This paper presents the investigation of agenda-setting on the SNS Vkontakte of four popular news groups which represent following media: Russia Today, TASS, RBC and Meduza. We compared the topic coverage of mentioned media and the engagement rate for the news. We discovered that only RT’s agenda correspond to the audience concern. In other news groups correlations were about zero. These results did not confirm our main hypotheses, but the analysis of the communication activity suggested that there was artificial activity which could affect the engagement rate. In addition, we revealed that the state media tend to cover the unobtrusive issues while the private ones – the obtrusive issues. The main methodological result of this paper is the demonstration how to replace the surveys by social media metrics in research of agenda-setting.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Vkontakte. Catalog, https://vk.com/catalog.php.
- 2.
Alexa. Traffic Statistics, https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/vk.com.
- 3.
Yandex, https://yandex.ru/yaca/cat/Media/.
- 4.
Medialogy, http://www.mlg.ru/ratings/
- 5.
Vkontakte. API methods, https://vk.com/dev/methods
- 6.
Vkontakte. RT news in Russian, https://vk.com/rt_russian.
- 7.
Vkontakte. TASS, https://vk.com/tassagency.
- 8.
Vkontakte. Meduza, https://vk.com/meduzaproject.
- 9.
Vkontakte. RBC, https://vk.com/rbc.
- 10.
Vkontakte. RBC, https://vk.com/topic-25232578_32782346.
References
Ader, C.R.: A longitudinal study of agenda setting for the issue of environmental pollution. Journal. Mass Commun. Q. 72(2), 300–311 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909507200204
Aruguete, N.: The agenda setting hypothesis in the new media environment. Comunicacion y Sociedad 28, 35–58 (2017)
Bennett, K.M.: Low level social engagement as a precursor of mortality among people in later life. Age Ageing 31(3), 165–168 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/31.3.165
Brosius, H.B., Kepplinger, H.M.: The agenda-setting function of television news: static and dynamic views. Commun. Res. 17(2), 183–211 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1177/009365090017002003
Chan, M., Fassbender, K.: Evaluating public engagement for a consensus development conference. J. Palliat. Med. 21, 1–20 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2017.0390
Dearing, J., Rogers, E.M.: Agenda-setting research: where has it been, where is it going? Commun. Yearb. 11, 555–594 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1988.11678708
Fitzgerald, R., et al.: Generating news: agenda setting in radio broadcast news. In: Burger, M. (ed.) L’analyse Linguistique des Discours Médiatiques, Nota Bene, Québec, pp. 133–154 (2008)
Fletcher, R., et al.: Measuring the Reach of “Fake News” and Online Disinformation in Europe. Reuters Institute Factsheet, https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/measuring-reach-fake-news-and-online-disinformation-europe
Garrison, D.R., Cleveland-Innes, M., Koole, M., Kappelman, J.: Revisiting methodological issues in transcript analysis: negotiated coding and reliability. Internet High. Educ. 9(1), 1–8 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.11.001
Guo, L., Vargo, C.: The power of message networks: a big-data analysis of the network agenda setting model and issue ownership. Mass Commun. Soc. 18(5), 557–576 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1045300
Guo, L.: The application of social network analysis in agenda setting research: a methodological exploration. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 56(4), 616–631 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.732148
Hanitzsch, T., Folker, H., Corinna, L.: Setting the agenda, influencing public opinion and advocating for social change: determinants of journalistic interventionism in 21 countries. Journal. Stud. 17(1), 1–20 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.959815
Harder, A.R., Sevenans, J., Aelst, P.: Intermedia agenda setting in the social media age: how traditional players dominate the news agenda in election times. Int. J. Press Polit. 22(2), 1–19 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217704969
Hudson, S., Huang, L., Roth, M.S., Madden, T.J.: The influence of social media interactions on consumer-brand relationships: a three-country study of brand perceptions and marketing behaviors. Int. J. Res. Mark. 33(1), 27–41 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.06.004
Kwansah-Aidoo, K.: The appeal of qualitative methods to traditional agenda-setting research: an example from West Africa. Gazette 63(6), 521–537 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/0016549201063006004
Lee, D., Hosanagar, K., Nair, H.: The effect of advertising content on consumer engagement: evidence from Facebook (2013). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257409065_The_Effect_of_Advertising_Content_on_Consumer_Engagement_Evidence_from_Facebook
Lehmann, J., Lalmas, M., Yom-Tov, E., Dupret, G.: Models of user engagement. In: Masthoff, J., Mobasher, B., Desmarais, M.C., Nkambou, R. (eds.) UMAP 2012. LNCS, vol. 7379, pp. 164–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31454-4_14
Lu, O.H.T., Huang, A.Y.Q., Huang J.C.H., Huang, C.S.J., Yang, S.J.H.: Early-stage engagement: applying big data analytics on collaborative learning environment for measuring learners’ engagement rate. In: International Conference on Educational Innovation through Technology. IEEE, Tainan (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/eitt.2016.28
McCombs, M., Shaw, D.L.: The agenda-setting function of mass media. Publ. Opin. Q. 36, 176–187 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
McCombs, M.: A look at agenda-setting: past, present and future. Journal. Stud. 6(4), 543–557 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500250438
McCombs, M.: The agenda-setting role of the mass media in the shaping of public opinion. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237394610_The_Agenda-Setting_Role_of_the_Mass_Media_in_the_Shaping_of_Public_Opinion
Mulgan, G.: Measuring social value. Stanf. Soc. Innov. Rev. 8(3), 38–43 (2010)
Neuman, R.W., Guggenheim, L., Mo Jang, S., Bae, S.Y.: The dynamics of public attention: agenda-setting theory meets big data. J. Commun. 64(2), 193–214 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12088
Niciporuc, T.: Comparative analysis of the engagement rate on Facebook and Google Plus social networks. In: Proceedings of International Academic Conferences, pp. 334–339. International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, Prague, London (2014)
Noguera, J.M.: The new agenda setting paradigm in the web: cybermedia towards news social filters. Int. Assoc. Media Commun. Res. (2007)
Paul, C., Matthews, M.: The Russian “Firehose of Falsehood” Propaganda Model. http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/perspetives/PE100/PE198/RAND_PE198.pdf
Pedro, S.D.G.: Athletes engagement, resilience, and rate of perceived exertion on Portuguese national- and international-level wrestlers. Int. J. Wrestl. Sci. 6(1), 5–10 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/21615667.2016.1166299
Peñaflor, J.: Beyond “Likes” an assessment of user engagement in Facebook among Philippine Academic Libraries. Libr. Manag. 39(1/2), 59–65 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-12-2016-0100
Pingree, R.J., Stoycheff, E., Sui, M., Peifer, J.T.: Setting a non-agenda: effects of a perceived lack of problems in recent news or Twitter. Mass Commun. Soc. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2018.1451543
Pinto, S., Balenzuela, P., Dorso, C.O.: Setting the agenda: different strategies of a mass media in a model of cultural dissemination. Physica A 458, 378–390 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.04.024
Russell, F.M., Hendricks, A.M., Choi, H., Conner, S.E.: Who sets the news agenda on Twitter? Journalists’ posts during the 2013 US Government shutdown. Digit. Journal. 3(6), 925–943 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.995918
Sabate, F., et al.: Factors influencing popularity of branded content in Facebook fan pages. Eur. Manag. J. 32(6), 1001–1011 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2014.05.001
Salvo, M.T., et al.: Social media engagement: identifying the predictive anatomy of organic social content. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/39080
Sayre, B., Bode, L., Shah, D., Wilcox, D., Shah, C.: Agenda setting in a digital age: tracking attention to California proposition 8 in social media, online news and conventional news. Policy Internet 2(2), 7–32 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-2866.1040
Semiz, G., Berger, P.D.: Determining the factors that drive Twitter engagement-rates. Arch. Bus. Res. 5(2), 38–47 (2017). https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.52.2700
Skogerbø, E., Bruns, A., Quodling, A., Ingebretsen, T.: Agenda-setting revisited: social media and sourcing in mainstream journalism. In: Bruns, A., Enli, G., Skogerbø, E., Larsson, A.O., Christensen, C. (eds.) The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics, pp. 104–120. Routledge, New York (2016)
Snegovaya, M.: Stifling the public sphere: media and civil society in Russia. National Endowment for Democracy. https://www.ned.org/stifling-the-public-sphere-media-and-civil-society-in-egypt-russia-and-vietnam/
Stoycheff, E., et al.: Agenda cueing effects of news and social media. Med. Psychol. 21(2), 182–201 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1311214
Theiss, S.K., et al.: Getting beyond impressions: an evaluation of engagement with breast cancer-related Facebook content. MHealth (2016). https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth.2016.10.02
Vadivu, V.M., Neelamalar, M.: Digital brand management—a study on the factors affecting customers’ engagement in Facebook pages. In: International Conference on Smart Technologies and Management for Computing, Communication, Controls, Energy and Materials (ICSTM), pp. 71–75. IEEE, Tamil Nadu (2015) https://doi.org/10.1109/icstm.2015.7225392
Wadhwa, V., Latimer, E., Chatterjee, K., McCarty, J., Fitzgerald, R.T.: Maximizing the tweet engagement rate in academia: analysis of the AJNR Twitter feed. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 38(10), 1866–1868 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5283
Walters, P., Hoven, K.A.: Measuring audience engagement with corporate brands, through their mobile phone. Int. J. Manag. Cases (2011). https://doi.org/10.5848/apbj.2011.00006
Watanabe, K.: Measuring news bias: Russia’s Official News Agency ITAR-TASS’ coverage of the Ukraine crisis. Eur. J. Commun. 32(3), 224–241 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323117695735
Weaver, D., McCombs, M., Shaw, D.L.: Agenda-setting research: issues, attributes and influences. In: Kaid, L.L. (ed.) Handbook of political Communication Research, pp. 257–282. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2004)
Yang, C., et al.: Research on the factors affecting users’ reposts in microblog. In: International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management, pp. 1–6. IEEE, Dalian, China (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/icsssm.2017.7996249
Yang, X., Chen, B.-C., Maity, M., Ferrara, E.: Social politics: agenda setting and political communication on social media. In: Spiro, E., Ahn, Y.-Y. (eds.) SocInfo 2016. LNCS, vol. 10046, pp. 330–344. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47880-7_20
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Judina, D., Platonov, K. (2018). Measuring Agenda Setting and Public Concern in Russian Social Media. In: Bodrunova, S. (eds) Internet Science. INSCI 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11193. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01437-7_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01437-7_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01436-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01437-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)