Advertisement

Mismatch Implications in Current-Mode Instrumentation Amplifiers

  • Leila Safari
  • Giuseppe Ferri
  • Shahram Minaei
  • Vincenzo Stornelli
Chapter
Part of the Analog Circuits and Signal Processing book series (ACSP)

Abstract

In the different CMIA topologies reported in previous chapters the final value of CMRR is determined by the matching between the used active elements. However, due to the stochastic nature of fabrication processes, the used active elements intended to be matched show different performances. In fact, high CMRR demands both a good circuit topology and a well matching between devices. Therefore, the designer should have good knowledge on both circuit design and mismatches. Owing to the critical role of mismatches in the performance of CMIAs, this chapter reports a brief study on the effect of mismatches in CMIA design. In the first section, a short analysis on the mismatch in CMOS technology is given. Then, the effect of mismatches in different structures of CMIAs is discussed. Later, some effective techniques helpful in reducing mismatches are reviewed. In the last section, a current input CMIA topology with robust performance against mismatches is shown.

References

  1. 1.
    Drennan P. G., McAndrew C. C. (2003) Understanding MOSFET mismatch for analog design. IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, 38(3):450–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agarwal K., Nassif S., Liu F., Hayes J., Nowka K. (2007) Rapid characterization of threshold voltage fluctuation in MOS devices. IEEE International Conference on Microelectronic Test Structures, Tokyo, 2007.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kinget P. R. (2005) Device mismatch and tradeoffs in the design of analog circuits. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 40(6):1212–1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Johnson J. B., Hook T. B., Lee Y. M. (2008) Analysis and modeling of threshold voltage mismatch for CMOS at 65 nm and beyond. IEEE Electron Device Letters, 29(7):802–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Safari L., Minaei S., Ferri G., Stornelli V. (2018) Analysis and design of a new COA-based current-mode instrumentation amplifier with robust performance against mismatches. AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 89:105–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Azhari S. J., Kaabi H. (2000) AZKA cell, the current-mode alternative of Wheatstone bridge. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Fundamental Theory and Applications, 47(9):1277–1284.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pandey N., Nand D., Pandey R. (2016) Generalized operational floating current conveyor based instrumentation amplifier. IET Circuits Devices Syst., 10(3):209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pandey N., Nanand D., Venkatesh Kumar V., Kumar Ahalawat V., Malhotra C. (2016) Realization of OFCC based transimpedance mode instrumentation amplifier. Theoretical and Applied Electrical Engineering, 14:162–167.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pandey R., Pandey N., Paul S. K. (2013) Electronically tunable transimpedance instrumentation amplifier based on OTRA. Journal of Engineering, 10:, Article ID 648540, 5 pages.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gupta K., Gupta P., Pandey N., Pandey R. (2016) CDBA - current based instrumentation amplifier. Journal of Communications Technology, Electronics and Computer Science, 4:11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cini U. (2014) A low-offset high CMRR current-mode instrumentation amplifier using differential difference current conveyor. 1st IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems (ICECS), Marseille, 2014.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hassan T. , Mahmoud S. A. (2010) New CMOS DVCC realization and applications to instrumentation amplifier and active-RC filters. International Journal of Electronics and Communcations (AEÜ), 64:47–55, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Laker K. R., Sansen W. M. C. (1994) Design of analog integrated circuits and systems. Spinger, 1994.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Douglas E. L., Lovely D. F. , Luke D. M. (2004) A low-voltage current-mode instrumentation amplifier designed in a 0.18-micron CMOS technology.Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering 2004 (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37513), 2004.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leila Safari
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Ferri
    • 2
  • Shahram Minaei
    • 3
  • Vincenzo Stornelli
    • 2
  1. 1.TehranIran
  2. 2.University of L’AquilaL’aquilaItaly
  3. 3.Doğuş UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations