The EU, CARIFORUM, and CELAC: A New Development Alliance?

  • Percy C. HintzenEmail author
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)


The chapter argues that a bi-regional economic, political, and strategic relationship between the European Union (EU) and Latin America and the Caribbean can reverse the negative consequences being experienced by both regions of a post-World War II American-centered North Atlantic alliance. Such a relationship can replicate the benefits that propelled China’s global emergence based on the development of an Asian regional network. The normative power of Europe’s progressive form of social democracy makes the EU an attractive bi-regional partner, notwithstanding the central role it played in a US-centered North Atlantic alliance of neocolonial imperialism that devastated the political economies of the Latin American and the Caribbean region.


  1. Alvarado, Liza Torres. 2013. The US Must Re-evaluate Its Foreign Policy in Latin America. May 13. Accessed 26 July 2017.
  2. Amin, Samir. 1980. Class and Nation. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  3. Amsden, Alice. 2007. Escape from Empire: The Developing World’s Journey Through Heaven and Hell. Cambridge/London: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Escobar, Arturo. 2012. Encountering Development. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. EU. 2016. EU-CELAC Relations. October 2016. Accessed 26 July 2017.
  6. ———. 2017. Latin America and the Caribbean. February 5. Accessed 29 July 2017.
  7. European Commission. 2017a. Migration and Population Statistics. March. Accessed 30 July 2017.
  8. ———. 2017b. Population Structure and Aging. July 20. Accessed 29 July 2017.
  9. Fraser, Cary. 1994. Ambivalent Anti-colonialism: The United States and the Genesis of West Indian Independence, 1940–1964. Westport/London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  10. Frayer, Janis Mackey. 2017. China Ventures into America’s Backyard: Latin America. April 5. Accessed 23 July 2017.
  11. Goldstone, Jack. 2010. The New Population Bomb: The Four Megatrends that Will Change the World. Foreign Affairs, January/February: 31–43.Google Scholar
  12. Grandin, Greg. 2006. Empire’s Workshop: Latin America, the United States and the Rise of the New Imperialism. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  13. Harvey, David. 2006. The Limits to Capital. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  14. Horowitz, Z. 2014. Bolivarian Alliance for Our Peoples of Our America – ALBA. May 29. Accessed 3 Mar 2017.
  15. International Monetary Fund. 2017. Current Account Balance. July 25. Accessed 31 July 2017.
  16. Kirchick, James. 2017. The End of Europe: Dictators, Demagogues and the Coming Dark Age. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Pacheco-Lopez, Penelope and A. P. Thirlwall. 2005. Trade Liberalisation, the Balance of Payments and Growth in Latin America. Accessed 31 July 2017.
  18. Polanyi, Karl. 1975. The Economy as Instituted Process. In Trade and Market in the Early Empires, ed. Conrad Arensburg, Harvey Pearson, and Karl Polanyi, 243–270. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 1944/2001. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  20. Rachman, Gideon. 2016. Asia’s Rise and America’s Decline: From Obama to Trump and Beyond. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar
  21. Robinson, William I. 2014. Global Capitalism and the Crisis of Humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Salazar, Rafael. 2016. Chinese Investment in Latin America: A Poisoned Chalice? June 19. Accessed 4 Aug 2017.
  23. Secretariat ACP. 2017. African, Caribbean, and Pacific Group of States. July 26. Accessed 26 July 2017.
  24. The EU, 2012. Charter of the Fundamental Rights of the EU. October 26. Accessed 16 July 2017.
  25. ———. 2015. EU-CELAC Summit 2015 Brussels: Facts and Figures About the Relations Between the EU and the Community of Latin America and Caribbean States. Publications Office of the EU, The EU, Luxemburg: The EU.Google Scholar
  26. The European Trade Union Confederation. 2006. The European Social Model. July. Accessed 16 July 2017.
  27. The Washington Post. 2007. Great Britain. Accessed 25 July 2017.
  28. United States Census. 2017a. 2016: US Trade with China. Accessed 23 July 2017.
  29. ———. 2017b. Trade in Goods with South and Central America. Accessed 23 July 2017.
  30. ———. 2017c. Trade in Goods with World, Seasonally Adjusted. Accessed 23 July 2017.
  31. Williams, P., and L. Chrisman, eds. 1994. Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory: A Reader. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Xinhua News. 2011. L. American Leaders Officially Sign CELAC into Effect as New Bloc. December 4. Accessed 3 Mar 2017.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Florida International UniversityMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations