Skip to main content

Designing a Performance Measurement System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Designing Performance Measurement Systems

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

Abstract

The present chapter discusses a core problem of quality management for organizations: establishing and maintaining a performance measurement system. Flowing from the mission and strategic planning of one organization, a performance measurement system is supposed to include the data to collect, analyze, report and, finally, use to make sound business decisions.

The remainder of this chapter is divided into eight sections. Sections 5.1 and 5.2 present the basic characteristics of an integrated performance measurement system. Section 5.3 discusses some popular approaches to develop performance measurement systems: the Balanced Scorecard, the Critical Few, the Performance Dashboards, and the EFQM model. Description is supported by the use of practical examples. Sections 5.4, 5.5 and 5.6 discuss how to develop/synthesise indicators and maintain an effective performance measurement system. Sections 5.7 and 5.8 deal with the possible misuse of indicators and their impact on organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AECD. (1997). Rewarding progress towards goals: Highlights of Alberta’s performance envelope funding. Edmonton: Advanced Education and Career Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • AECD. (1999). 1998/99 Annual Report. Edmonton: Advanced Education and Career Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akao, V. (1988). Quality function deployment. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • APQI (Associazione Premio Qualità Italia). (2018). Migliorare le organizzazioni pubbliche attraverso l’autovalutazione. Retrieved September 2018, from http://www.apqi.it/media/1128/caf_2013_italiano.pdf.

  • Atkinson, A. (1997). Linking performance measurement to strategy. Journal of Strategic Performance Measurement, 1(4), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auditor General of Canada and the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development. (2017). Developing performance measures for sustainable development strategies. Retrieved September 2018, from http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/meth_gde_e_23715.html.

  • Barnetson, B., & Cutright, M. (2000). Performance indicators as conceptual technologies. Higher Education, 40, 277–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, M. C., & Bourne, P. (2011). Handbook of corporate performance management. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. G. (1996). Keeping score: Using the right metrics to drive world-class performance. New York: Quality Resources, CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DISPEA. (2004–2005). Dipartimento di Sistemi di produzione ed economia dell’Azienda, Project: “Il nuovo Call Center del Comune di Torino: monitoraggio della qualità della comunicazione offerta ai cittadini” (in alliance with AICQ and Comune di Torino).

    Google Scholar 

  • DISPEA. (2005). Dipartimento di Sistemi di produzione ed economia dell’Azienda, Project: “Valutazione della qualità nei servizi SO (Service Operations)” (in alliance with RAI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R. (1991). The performance measurement manifesto. Harvard Business Review, 69(1), 131–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • EFQM (European Foundation for Quality Management). (2013). Retrieved September 2018, from www.efqm.org.

  • Flapper, S. D. P., Fortuin, L., & Stoop, P. P. M. (1996). Toward consistent performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 16(7), 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschini, F. (2001). Dai Prodotti ai Servizi. Le nuove frontiere per la misura della qualità. Torino: UTET Libreria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franceschini, F. (2002). Advanced quality function deployment. Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press/CRC Press LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franceschini, F., Galetto, M., & Maisano, D. (2005). A short survey on air quality indicators: Properties, use, and (mis)use. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 16(5), 490–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschini, F., Galetto, M., & Maisano, D. (2007). Management by measurement: Designing key indicators and performance measurement systems. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franceschini, F., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2018). Service gap deployment: A framework to link quality gaps to service activities. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 29(1), 85–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschini, F., & Romano, D. (1999). Control chart for linguistic variables: A method based on the use of linguistic quantifiers. International Journal of Production Research, 37(16), 3791–3801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, J., & Katz, G. (1998). Metrics: You are what you measure! European Management Journal, 16(5), 517–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton College. (2004). Dashboard indicators: The top mission-critical indicators for Houghton College. Retrieved September 2018, from http://campus.houghton.edu/.

  • Juran, J. M. (2016). Quality control handbook (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. (1992). The balanced scorecard-measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, January–February, 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2008). The execution premium. Linking strategy to operations for competitive advantage. Boston: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kells, H. (1992). Self-regulation in higher education: A multinational perspective on collaborative systems of quality assurance and control. London: Jessica-Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohman, C., Fortuin, L., & Wouters, M. (2004). Designing a performance measurement system: A case study. European Journal of Operational Research, 156, 267–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1996). Managing government, governing management. Harvard Business Review, May–June, 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neely, A. (Ed.). (2002). Business performance measurement: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neely, A., Richards, H., Mills, J., Platts, K., & Bourneal, M. (1997). Designing performance measures: A structured approach. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 17(11), 1131–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemhauser, G. L., & Wolsey, L. A. (1988). Integer and combinatorial optimization. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Newcomer, K. (Ed.). (1997). Using performance measurement to improve public and nonprofit programs, New directions for evaluation (Vol. 75). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. The Journal of Marketing, 49, 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R. G., & Rardin, R. L. (1988). Discrete optimization. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrin, B. (1998). Effective use and misuse of performance measurement. American Journal of Evaluation, 19(3), 367–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polster, C., & Newson, J. (1998). Don’t count your blessing: The social accomplishments of performance indicators’. In J. Currie & J. Newson (Eds.), Universities and globalization: Critical perspective (pp. 173–182). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in sciences and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (1996). Making things auditable. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21(2-3), 289–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmenner, R. W., & Vollmann, T. E. (1994). Performance measures: Gaps, false alarms and the usual suspects. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 14(12), 58–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J., & Varley, S. (1997). Developing a balanced scorecard at AT&T. Journal of Strategic Performance Measurement, 1(4), 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorburn, W. M. (1918). The myth of Occam’s razor. Mind, 27, 345–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Energy. (1996a). Guidelines for performance measurement (DOE G 120.1-5). Retrieved September 2018, from http://www.orau.gov.

  • U.S. Department of Energy. (1996b). Critical few performance measures-definitions and methodology. Office of Environmental Management (DOE/EM).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Energy – PBM SIG (Performance-Based Management Special Interest Group). (2012). Performance-based management handbook of techniques and tools–How to measure performance (revised). Retrieved September 2018, from http://www.orau.gov/pbm.

  • U.S. Department of Energy/Nevada Operations – DOE/NV. (1994, June). Performance measurement process guidance document. DOE/NV Family Quality Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of the Treasury. (1994). Criteria for developing performance measurement systems in the public sector.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. General Accounting Office. (2012). Performance measurement and evaluation: Definitions and relationships (revised). Retrieved September 2018, from http://www.gao.gov/special.pubs/gg98026.pdf.

  • University of California. (2017). SMART goals: A how to guide. Retrieved September 2018, from https://www.ucop.edu.

  • Winston, J. (1993). Performance indicators: Do they perform? Evaluation News and Comment, 2(3), 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Franceschini, F., Galetto, M., Maisano, D. (2019). Designing a Performance Measurement System. In: Designing Performance Measurement Systems. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01192-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics