Skip to main content

Asking Both the User’s Heart and Its Owner: Empirical Evidence for Substance Dualism

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems and Neuroscience

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation ((LNISO,volume 29))

Abstract

Mind-body physicalism is the metaphysical view that all mental phenomena are ultimately physical phenomena, or are necessitated by physical phenomena. Mind-body dualism is the view that at least some mental phenomena are non-physical. While mind-related concepts are usually measured using questionnaires, body-related concepts are measured using physiological instruments. We breakdown the narrowed measuring approaches within the simplified mind-body discussion to all four possible substance-measuring pairs and evaluate the mind-body substance dualism theory versus the physicalism theory applying perceived and physiological measured stress data using a wearable long-term electrocardiogram recorder. As a result we derive empirical evidence and strong arguments against physicalism, and assess the overall strength of the benefits of NeuroIS instruments as complementary measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Buettner, R.: Asking both the user’s brain and its owner using subjective and objective psychophysiological neurois instruments. In: ICIS 2017 Proceedings: 38th International Conference on Information Systems, Seoul, South Korea, 10–13 December 2017 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kim, J.: Mind in a Physical World. MA, U.S., MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baevskii, R.M.: Analysis of heart rate variability in space medicine. Hum. Physiol. 28(2), 202–213 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zilov, V.G., Khadartsev, A.A., Eskov, V.V., Eskov, V.M.: Experimental study of statistical stability of cardiointerval samples. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 164(2), 115–117 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eskov, V.M., Eskov, V.V., Filatova, O.E.: Characteristic features of measurements and modeling for biosystems in phase spaces of states. Meas. Tech. 53(12), 1404–1410 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., Mermelstein, R.: A global measure of perceived stress. J. Health Soc. Behav. 24(4), 385–396 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Buettner, Cognitive Workload of Humans Using Artificial Intelligence Systems: Towards objective measurement applying eye-tracking technology. In: KI 2013 Proc., ser. LNAI, vol. 8077, pp. 37–48 (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Buettner, R., Daxenberger, B., Eckhardt, A., Maier, C.: Cognitive workload induced by information systems: Introducing an objective way of measuring based on pupillary diameter responses. In: Pre-ICIS HCI/MIS 2013 Proceedings, 2013, Paper 20 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Buettner, R.: Analyzing mental workload states on the basis of the pupillary hippus. In: NeuroIS’14 Proceedings, p. 52 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fischer, T., Riedl, R.: Technostress research: a nurturing ground for measurement pluralism? Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 40, 375–401 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Riedl, R., Kindermann, H., Auinger, A., Javor, A.: Computer breakdown as a stress factor during task completion under time pressure: Identifying gender differences based on skin conductance. Adv. Hum. Comp. Interact. 1–8 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Riedl, R.: On the biology of technostress: literature review and research agenda. DATA BASE. Adv. Inf. Syst. (ACM SIGMIS Database) 44(1), 18–55 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Riedl, R., Kindermann, H., Auinger, A., Javor, A.: Technostress from a neurobiological perspective: system breakdown increases the stress hormone cortisol in computer users. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 4(2), 61–69 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tams, S., Hill, K., de Guinea, A.O., Thatcher, J., Grover, V.: NeuroIS—alternative or complement to existing methods? illustrating the holistic effects of neuroscience and self-reported data in the context of technostress research. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 15(10), 723–753 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nathan, R.G., Rosch, P.J.: The Doctor’s Guide to Instant Stress Relief. Random House Publishing Group, New York (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Riedl, R., Banker, R.D., Benbasat, I., Davis, F.D., Dennis, A.R., Dimoka, A., Gefen, D., Gupta, A., Ischebeck, A., Kenning, P., Müller-Putz, G., Pavlou, P.A., Straub, D.W., vom Brocke, J., Weber, B.: On the foundations of NeuroIS: reflections on the gmunden retreat 2009. CAIS 27, 243–264 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Riedl, R., Fischer, T., Léger, P.M.: A decade of neurois research: Status quo, challenges, and future directions. In: ICIS 2017 Proceedings: 38th International Conference on Information Systems, 10–13 December 2017, Seoul, South Korea (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dimoka, A., Banker, R.D., Benbasat, I., Davis, F.D., Dennis, A.R., Gefen, D., Gupta, A., Ischebeck, A., Kenning, P.H., Pavlou, P.A., Müller-Putz, G., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Weber, B.: On the use of neurophysiological tools in is research: developing a research agenda for NeuroIS. MIS Quarterly 36(3), 679–A19 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Riedl, R., Léger, P.-M.: Fundamentals of NeuroIS: Information Systems and the Brain. Springer, Berlin (2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Riedl, R., Davis, F.D., Hevner, A.R.: Towards a NeuroIS research methodology: Intensifying the discussion on methods, tools, and measurement. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 15(10), 1–35 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bennett, M.R., Hacker, P.M.S.: Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Blackwell, Oxford (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Thayer, J.F., Åhs, F., Fredrikson, M., Sollers, J.J., Wager, T.D.: A meta-analysis of heart rate variability and neuroimaging studies: Implications for heart rate variability as a marker of stress and health. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 36(2), 747–756 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the whole team of corvolution GmbH for collecting the data used for this analysis. In addition, we would like to thank the reviewers, who provided very helpful comments on the refinement of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricardo Buettner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Buettner, R., Bachus, L., Konzmann, L., Prohaska, S. (2019). Asking Both the User’s Heart and Its Owner: Empirical Evidence for Substance Dualism. In: Davis, F., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Léger, PM., Randolph, A. (eds) Information Systems and Neuroscience. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 29. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01087-4_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics