Registration-Free Infant Cortical Surface Parcellation Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11072)


Automatic parcellation of infant cortical surfaces into anatomical regions of interest (ROIs) is of great importance in brain structural and functional analysis. Conventional cortical surface parcellation methods suffer from two main issues: (1) Cortical surface registration is needed for establishing the atlas-to-individual correspondences; (2) The mapping from cortical shape to the parcellation labels requires designing of specific hand-crafted features. To address these issues, in this paper, we propose a novel cortical surface parcellation method, which is free of surface registration and designing of hand-crafted features, based on deep convolutional neural network (DCNN). Our main idea is to formulate surface parcellation as a patch-wise classification problem. Briefly, we use DCNN to train a classifier, whose inputs are the local cortical surface patches with multi-channel cortical shape descriptors such as mean curvature, sulcal depth, and average convexity; while the outputs are the parcellation label probabilities of cortical vertices. To enable effective convolutional operation on the surface data, we project each spherical surface patch onto its intrinsic tangent plane by a geodesic-distance-preserving mapping. Then, after classification, we further adopt the graph cuts method to improve spatial consistency of the parcellation. We have validated our method based on 90 neonatal cortical surfaces with manual parcellations, showing superior accuracy and efficiency of our proposed method.


  1. 1.
    Glasser, M.F., et al.: A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex. Nature 536, 171–178 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Desikan, R.S., et al.: An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage 31, 968–980 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li, G., et al.: Automatic cortical sulcal parcellation based on surface principal direction flow field tracking. NeuroImage 46, 923–937 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li, G., Shen, D.: Consistent sulcal parcellation of longitudinal cortical surfaces. NeuroImage 57, 76–88 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu, Z., Li, G., Meng, Y., Wang, L., Lin, W., Shen, D.: 4D infant cortical surface atlas construction using spherical patch-based sparse representation. In: Descoteaux, M., Maier-Hein, L., Franz, A., Jannin, P., Collins, D.L., Duchesne, S. (eds.) MICCAI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10433, pp. 57–65. Springer, Cham (2017). Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li, G., et al.: Computational neuroanatomy of baby brains: a review. NeuroImage (2018, in press).
  7. 7.
    Li, G., et al.: Construction of 4D high-definition cortical surface atlases of infants: methods and applications. Med. Image Anal. 25, 22–36 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li, G., Nie, J., et al.: Consistent reconstruction of cortical surfaces from longitudinal brain MR images. Neuroimage 59, 3805–3820 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hill, J., et al.: A surface-based analysis of hemispheric asymmetries and folding of cerebral cortex in term-born human infants. J. Neurosci. 30, 2268–2276 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bronstein, M.M., et al.: Geometric deep learning: going beyond euclidean data. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 34, 18–42 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bruna, J., et al.: Spectral networks and locally connected networks on graphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6203 (2013)
  12. 12.
    Masci, J., et al.: Geodesic convolutional neural networks on Riemannian manifolds. In: Proceedings of ICCV workshops, pp. 37–45 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fischl, B., et al.: Cortical surface-based analysis: II: inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage 9, 195–207 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boykov, Y., Kolmogorov, V.: An experimental comparison of min-cut/max-flow algorithms for energy minimization in vision. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 26, 1124–1137 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yeo, B.T., et al.: Spherical demons: fast diffeomorphic landmark-free surface registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 29, 650–668 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  2. 2.Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd.ShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations