Joint Prediction and Classification of Brain Image Evolution Trajectories from Baseline Brain Image with Application to Early Dementia

  • Can Gafuroğlu
  • Islem RekikEmail author
  • [Authorinst]for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11072)


Despite the large body of existing neuroimaging-based studies on brain dementia, in particular mild cognitive impairment (MCI), modeling and predicting the early dynamics of dementia onset and development in healthy brains is somewhat overlooked in the literature. The majority of computer-aided diagnosis tools developed for classifying healthy and demented brains mainly rely on either using single timepoint or longitudinal neuroimaging data. Longitudinal brain imaging data offer a larger time window to better capture subtle brain changes in early MCI development, and its utilization has been shown to improve classification and prediction results. However, typical longitudinal studies are challenged by a limited number of acquisition timepoints and the absence of inter-subject matching between timepoints. To address this limitation, we propose a novel framework that learns how to predict the developmental trajectory of a brain image from a single acquisition timepoint (i.e., baseline), while classifying the predicted trajectory as ‘healthy’ or ‘demented’. To do so, we first rigidly align all training images, then extract ‘landmark patches’ from training images. Next, to predict the patch-wise trajectory evolution from baseline patch, we propose two novel strategies. The first strategy learns in a supervised manner to select a few training atlas patches that best boost the classification accuracy of the target testing patch. The second strategy learns in an unsupervised manner to select the set of most similar training atlas patches to the target testing patch using multi-kernel patch manifold learning. Finally, we train a linear classifier for each predicted patch trajectory. To identify the final label of the target subject, we use majority voting to aggregate the labels assigned by our model to all landmark patches’ trajectories. Our image prediction model boosted the classification performance by 14% point without further leveraging any enhancing methods such as feature selection.


  1. 1.
    Apostolova, L.G., Thompson, P.M.: Mapping progressive brain structural changes in early Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychologia 46(6), 1597–1612 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Frisoni, G.B., Fox, N.C., Jack, C.R., Scheltens, P., Thompson, P.M.: The clinical use of structural MRI in Alzheimer disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 6(2), 67–77 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Magnin, B., et al.: Support vector machine-based classification of Alzheimer’s disease from whole-brain anatomical MRI. Neuroradiology 51(2), 73–83 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kloppel, S., et al.: Automatic classification of MR scans in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 131(Pt 3), 681–689 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cuingnet, R., et al.: Automatic classification of patients with Alzheimer’s disease from structural MRI: a comparison of ten methods using the ADNI database. NeuroImage 56(2), 766–781 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sanroma, G., et al.: Early prediction of Alzheimer’s disease with non-local patch-based longitudinal descriptors. In: Wu, G., Munsell, B.C., Zhan, Y., Bai, W., Sanroma, G., Coupé, P. (eds.) Patch-MI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10530, pp. 74–81. Springer, Cham (2017). Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thung, K.H., Wee, C.Y., Yap, P.T., Shen, D.: Identification of progressive mild cognitive impairment patients using incomplete longitudinal MRI scans. Brain Struct. Funct. 221(8), 3979–3995 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhu, Y., Zhu, X., Kim, M., Shen, D., Wu, G.: Early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease by joint feature selection and classification on temporally structured support vector machine. In: Ourselin, S., Joskowicz, L., Sabuncu, M.R., Unal, G., Wells, W. (eds.) MICCAI 2016. LNCS, vol. 9900, pp. 264–272. Springer, Cham (2016). Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang, D., Shen, D., Initiative, A.D.N.: Predicting future clinical changes of MCI patients using longitudinal and multimodal biomarkers. PLOS One 7(3), 1–15 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sanroma, G., Wu, G., Gao, Y., Shen, D.: Learning-based atlas selection for multiple-atlas segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3111–3117 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang, B., Zhu, J., Pierson, E., Ramazzotti, D., Batzoglou, S.: Visualization and analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data by kernel-based similarity learning. Nat. Methods 14, 414 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thompson, P.M., et al.: Dynamics of gray matter loss in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurosci. 23(3), 994–1005 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Möller, C., et al.: Alzheimer disease and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia: automatic classification based on cortical atrophy for single-subject diagnosis. Radiology 279(3), 838–848 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rekik, I., Li, G., Yap, P.T., Chen, G., Lin, W., Shen, D.: Joint prediction of longitudinal development of cortical surfaces and white matter fibers from neonatal MRI. NeuroImage 152, 411–424 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fishbaugh, J., Prastawa, M., Gerig, G., Durrleman, S.: Geodesic regression of image and shape data for improved modeling of 4D trajectories. Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), 2014 IEEE 11th International Symposium on (2014) 385–388Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Can Gafuroğlu
    • 1
  • Islem Rekik
    • 1
    Email author
  • [Authorinst]for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
  1. 1.BASIRA Lab, CVIP Group, School of Science and Engineering, ComputingUniversity of DundeeDundeeUK

Personalised recommendations