Abstract
This chapter explores how Shakespeare’s plays facilitate engagement by exploiting the audience’s reliance on stage conventions. It proposes that like mimesis, conventions pertaining to genre, the stage’s representative capacity, or the players’ ontological status are manipulated by the dramatist to valuable ends. Plays like Richard III, Cymbeline, and 2 Henry IV introduce ghosts and ‘dead’ bodies, then generate suspense, surprise, or disorientation by undercutting the conventions relied on for the representations. Elsewhere, the non-theatrical identities of a production’s constituent parts reassert themselves to confront spectators with problems similar to those encountered by the fictional characters; or else the plays restrict their elements’ capacities to function mimetically, our resulting awareness of the ‘real’ ontologies and uses of bodies, props, or the stage then disrupting the illusion in ways that simultaneously work to enrich it.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Works Cited
Barish, Jonas. 1991. “Soft, Here Follows Prose”: Shakespeare’s Stage Documents. In The Arts of Performance in Elizabethan and Early Stuart Drama, ed. Murray Biggs, et al. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Boas, F.S. 1908. Shakespeare and His Predecessors. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Craik, T.W. 1979. ‘I Know When One Is Dead and When One Lives’. Annual Shakespeare Lecture 1979. In The Proceedings of the British Academy, vol. lxv. London: Oxford University Press.
Cressy, David. 1997. Birth, Marriage and Death: Ritual, Religion and Life Cycle in Tudor and Stuart England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Danson, Lawrence. 2000. Shakespeare’s Dramatic Genres. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Dessen, Alan C. 1975. Two Falls and a Trap. English Literary Renaissance 5: 291–307.
Dessen, Alan C., and Leslie Thompson. 1999. A Dictionary of Stage Directions in English Drama, 1580–1642. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Drakakis, John. 2013. Shakespeare Against Genre. Pólemos 7 (1): 83–97.
Foakes, R.A. 2005. “Armed at Point Exactly”: The Ghost in Hamlet. Shakespeare Survey 58: 34–47.
Gamboa, Brett. 2012. Letting Unpleasantness Lie: Counter-Intuition and Character in The Merchant of Venice. In Shakespeare’s Sense of Character—On the Page and From the Stage, ed. Yu Jin Ko and Michael Shurgot. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Gamboa, Brett. 2013. “Is’t Real That I See?”: Staged Realism and the Paradox of Shakespeare’s Audience. Shakespeare Bulletin 31 (4): 669–688.
Gamboa, Brett. 2018. Shakespeare’s Double Plays: Dramatic Economy on the Early Modern Stage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greenblatt, Stephen. 2001. Hamlet in Purgatory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hackel, Heidi Brayman. 2005. Reading Material in Early Modern England: Print, Gender, and Literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harris, Jonathan Gil, and Natasha Korda. 2002. Staged Properties in Early Modern Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jones, Rosalind, and Peter Stallbrass. 2000. Renaissance Clothing and the Materials of Memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kott, Jan. 1964. Shakespeare Our Contemporary. Garden City: Doubleday.
Matchett, William. 1979. Some Dramatic Techniques in King Lear. In Shakespeare and the Theatrical Dimension, ed. Philip C. McGuire and David A. Samuelson. New York: AMS Press.
Porter, Chloe. 2014. Making and Unmaking in Early Modern English Drama: Spectators, Aesthetics, and Incompletion. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Rocklin, Edward L. 2000. Measured Endings: How Productions from 1720 to 1929 Close Shakespeare’s Open Silences in Measure for Measure. Shakespeare Survey 53: 213–232.
Rosenberg, Marvin. 1978. The Masks of Macbeth. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Shakespeare, William. 1997. King Lear, Arden Third Series, ed. R.A. Foakes. London: Bloomsbury.
Shakespeare, William. 2016. The Norton Shakespeare, 3rd ed., ed. Stephen Greenblatt, et al. New York: Norton.
Zimmerman, Susan. 2005. The Early Modern Corpse and Shakespeare’s Theatre. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gamboa, B. (2019). Shakespeare’s Strange Conventionality. In: Loughnane, R., Semple, E. (eds) Staged Normality in Shakespeare's England. Palgrave Shakespeare Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00892-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00892-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00891-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00892-5
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)