Skip to main content

Intraoperative Patient Positioning and Neurological Injuries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Principles and Practice of Anesthesia for Thoracic Surgery

Abstract

Thoracic cases usually involve repositioning the patient after induction of anesthesia. Vigilance is required to avoid major displacement of airway devices, lines, and monitors during and after position changes. Obtaining central venous access after changing to the lateral position is extremely difficult. If a central line may be needed, it should be placed at induction. Prevention of peripheral nerve injuries in the lateral position requires a survey of the patient from the head and sides of the operating table prior to draping. Post-thoracotomy paraplegia is primarily a surgical complication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Desiderio DP, Burt M, Kolver AC, et al. The effects of endobronchial cuff inflation on double-lumen endobronchial tube movement after lateral positioning. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1997;11:595–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fortier G, Coté D, Bergeron C, et al. New landmarks improve the positioning of the left Broncho-Cath double-lumen tube: Comparison with the classic technique. Can J Anesth. 2001;48:790–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Britt BA, Gordon RA. Peripheral nerve injuries associated with anaesthesia. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1964;11(514):514–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Blichfeldt-Eckhardt M, Andersen C, Ording H, et al. Shoulder pain after thoracic surgery; type and time course, a prospective study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017;31:147–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yokoyama M, Ueda W, Hirakawa M. Haemodynamic effects of the lateral decubitus position and the kidney rest lateral decubitus position during anaesthesia. Br J Anesth. 2000;84:753–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shen Y, Feng M, Tan L, et al. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone versus decubitus position; ergonometric evaluation from a randomized and controlled study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98:1072–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Singh M, Uppal R, Chaudhary K, et al. Use of a single-lumen tube for minimally invasive and hybrid esophagectomies with prone thoracoscopic dissection: case series. J Clin Anesth. 2016;33:450–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Attar S. Paraplegia after thoracotomy: report of five cases and review of the literature. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;59:1410–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Horlocker T. Regional anesthesia in the anticoagulated patient: defining the risks (the second ASRA consensus conference on neuraxial anesthesia and anticoagulation). Reg Anes Pain Med. 2003;28:172–97.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kreppel D. Spinal hematoma: a literature survey with meta-analysis of 613 patients. Neurosurg Rev. 2003;26:1–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Short H. Paraplegia associated with the use of oxidized cellulose in posterolateral thoracotomy incisions. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990;50:288–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Greenberg R. Contemporary analysis of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair: a comparison of endovascular and open techniques. Circulation. 2008;118:808–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shamji M. Circulation of the spinal cord: an important consideration for thoracic surgeons. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:315–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Newman NJ. Perioperative visual loss after nonocular surgeries. Am J Opthalmol. 2008;145:604–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Heitz JW, Audu PB. Asymmetric postoperative visual loss after spine surgery in the lateral decubitus position. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:380–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Emery S, Daffner S, France J, et al. Effect of head position on intraocular pressure during lumbar spine fusion; a randomized, prospective study. J Bone & Joint Surg. 2015;97:1817–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cascio BM, Buchowski JM, Frassica FJ. Well-limb compartment syndrome after prolonged lateral decubitus positioning. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86:2038–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kretteck C, Aschemann D. Positioning techniques in surgical applications. Hamburg: Springer; 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Slinger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Clinical Case Discussion

Clinical Case Discussion

A 60-year-old woman presents for a left thoracotomy for left lower lobectomy for lung cancer. Past medical history includes a remote myocardial infarction with a preoperative ejection fraction of 40%, controlled hypertension, and diet-controlled diabetes mellitus. Regular medications are taken the morning of the OR, including metoprolol and aspirin 81 mg. A flexible epidural catheter with inner stainless steel coil wire is placed at T6/7 for postoperative analgesia. After an epidural test dose of 3 ml lidocaine 2%, an infusion of bupivacaine 0.1% plus hydromorphone 15ug/ml is started at 5 cc/h. A central line is placed after induction. The operation is remarkable for intraoperative hypotension requiring dopamine and norepinephrine and brisk bleeding near the costovertebral junction. Immediately postoperatively, blood pressure is in the patient’s normal range with no support, there is no motor deficit, and pain is well-controlled. Six hours postoperatively, a nurse from the ward calls to report that the patient is complaining of bilateral lower extremity motor weakness.

  1. 1.

    What is the differential diagnosis?

At this point, the differential is wide and includes a motor block secondary to epidural local anesthetic solution, an intrathecal catheter, compression of the nerve roots or spinal cord from an epidural hematoma or a foreign body, arterial embolus to a radicular artery, or a hypoperfusion state.

  1. 2.

    What should be done immediately?

Vital signs should be taken and documented, the epidural solution should be stopped, and the catheter should be aspirated. A focused chart review should be undertaken with special note taken of any recently administered anticoagulants. The surgeon should be called and be advised of the problem. A complete neurological examination should be performed.

  1. 3.

    What does the initial assessment reveal?

The patient is awake and alert. Her blood pressure is 89/65 with a normal heart rate and oxygen saturation. No blood or CSF is aspirated through the catheter. She is unable to move her legs. She has loss of sensation to pain and temperature in both legs, but proprioception is intact. Thirty minutes after the epidural solution has been turned off, there is no change in her neurological status. The last documented INR is 1.29 5 h ago. The patient received subcutaneous heparin for DVT prophylaxis 1 h ago.

  1. 4.

    What should be done next? What bloodwork, imaging, and consults should be ordered?

Dopamine is started through the patient’s central line to keep the blood pressure in her normal range (120/80) with continuous cardiac monitoring. “STAT” complete blood count and coagulation tests are drawn. There is hesitance to remove the epidural catheter in the context of a coagulation abnormality combined with recent heparin administration and aspirin. MRI is the preferred modality to diagnose an epidural hematoma. However, the in situ epidural catheter is not permitted in the scanner. After consultation with the radiologist, the epidural is left in place, and a CT is performed. The neurosurgeon and neurologist are called and made aware of the patient.

  1. 5.

    What is found on additional testing?

The CT shows no epidural hematoma or mass. The hemoglobin is 90 g/L. Platelets are normal. INR is 1.21. The patient is seen by the neurologist and given a provisional diagnosis of spinal cord ischemia causing an anterior cord syndrome.

  1. 6.

    What else can be done?

The patient is moved to a step-down unit with continuous monitoring. Neurologic vitals are done every 4 h. Dopamine is continued, and the patient is given 100 mg methylprednisolone IV q8h × 3 doses. Hemoglobin is maintained at 100 g/L. The epidural is removed 6 h after the last subcutaneous heparin dose. An MRI is then performed and is normal. Pain is controlled with hydromorphone intravenous PCA. Over the next 4 days, the patient gradually and completely recovers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Reimer, C., Slinger, P. (2019). Intraoperative Patient Positioning and Neurological Injuries. In: Slinger, P. (eds) Principles and Practice of Anesthesia for Thoracic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00859-8_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00859-8_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00858-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00859-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics