Advertisement

Optimizing the Impact of Resampling on QRS Detection

  • Marjan Gusev
  • Ervin Domazet
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 940)

Abstract

QRS detection is an essential activity performed on the electrocardiogram signal for finding heartbeat features. Even though there is already a lot of literature on QRS detection, we set a research question to find the dependence of QRS detection performance on the sampling frequency, and, if possible, to find a QRS detector that will be highly efficient at different sampling rates. Our synthesis technique aims to find the optimal value of the threshold parameters that define if the detected peak is artifact, noise or real QRS peak. In addition, we conducted experimental research to find the dependence and estimate the optimal threshold values for the best QRS detection performance. Our approach results with increased QRS detection performance on the original sampling frequency by improving the original Hamilton algorithm. We tested with the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia database. Lastly, QRS detection sensitivity and positive predictive rate are used to evaluate the performance of the algorithm.

Keywords

ECG QRS detection Hamilton Sampling frequency AD conversion bit resolution 

References

  1. 1.
    Ajdaraga, E., Gusev, M.: Analysis of sampling frequency and resolution in ECG signals. In: 25th 2017 Telecommunication Forum (TELFOR) 2017, pp. 1–4. IEEE, November 2017Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berntson, G.G., Quigley, K.S., Jang, J.F., Boysen, S.T.: An approach to artifact identification: application to heart period data. Psychophysiology 27(5), 586–598 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Domazet, E., Gusev, M.: Amplitude rescaling influence on QRS detection. Technical report 17/2018, University Sts Cyril and Methodius, Faculty of Computer Sciences and Engineering (2018)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ellis, R.J., Zhu, B., Koenig, J., Thayer, J.F., Wang, Y.: A careful look at ECG sampling frequency and R-peak interpolation on short-term measures of heart rate variability. Physiol. Meas. 36(9), 1827 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goldberger, A.L., et al.: Physiobank, physiotoolkit, and physionet. Circulation 101(23), e215–e220 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gusev, M., Stojmenski, A., Guseva, A.: ECGalert: a heart attack alerting system. In: Trajanov, D., Bakeva, V. (eds.) ICT Innovations 2017. CCIS, vol. 778, pp. 27–36. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67597-8_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hamilton, P.S., Tompkins, W.J.: Quantitative investigation of QRS detection rules using the MIT/BIH arrhythmia database. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 12, 1157–1165 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hamilton, P.: Open source ECG analysis software documentation (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Malik, M.: Task force of the european society of cardiology and the north american society of pacing and electrophysiology. Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Eur. Heart J. 17, 354–381 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moody, G.B., Mark, R.G.: The impact of the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 20(3), 45–50 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nyquist, H.: Certain topics in telegraph transmission theory. Trans. Am. Inst. Electr. Eng. 47(2), 617–644 (1928)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pahlm, O., Sörnmo, L.: Software QRS detection in ambulatory monitoring: a review. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 22(4), 289–297 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pan, J., Tompkins, W.J.: A real-time QRS detection algorithm. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 3, 230–236 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ziemssen, T., Gasch, J., Ruediger, H.: Influence of ECG sampling frequency on spectral analysis of RR intervals and baroreflex sensitivity using the EUROBAVAR data set. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 22(2), 159–168 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ss. Cyril and Methodius UniversityFaculty of Computer Science and EngineeringSkopjeMacedonia

Personalised recommendations