Advertisement

Technical Alterations in the Problem of Error: From the True and the False to the Normal and the Pathological

  • Samuel TalcottEmail author
Chapter
  • 101 Downloads

Abstract

Drawing on Canguilhem’s early writings, manuscript notes, famous medical thesis, and his co-authored Treatise on Logic and Morals, this chapter considers his classic formulations of the problem of error and argues that he partially transforms these through his encounter with human suffering and sickness. In both his genealogy of a thesis in positivist medicine and his own account of sickness and health, error as mistake is replaced by an interest in the role confusion and suffering play in sustaining creative endeavors in medical technique and sciences. While Canguilhem might thus appear to turn away from error, I argue that he remains committed to its elemental form: the trial and errors of life, be these exemplified by organisms or the history of science.

References

  1. Bachelard, Gaston. 1934a. “Idéalisme discursif.” Recherches philosophiques IV (1934–1935): 21–29.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 1934b. Le nouvel esprit scientifique. Paris: Éditions Alcan; English Translation: 1984. The New Scientific Spirit. Translated by A. Goldhammer. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Boutroux, Émile. 1927. Des Vérités Éternelles chez Descartes. Translated by M. Canguilhem). Paris: Alcan; Reprinted in Canguilhem 2011, 935–978.Google Scholar
  4. Canguilhem, Georges. 1929. “À la Gloire d’Hippocrate, Père du Tempérament.” Libres propos (Journal d’Alain) 20 août; Reprinted in Canguilhem 2011, 248–250.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 1934. Dossier “Psychologies,” Valenciennes. Fonds Georges Canguilhem, Centre d’Archives de Philosophie, d’Histoire et d’Édition des Sciences— UMS 2267.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 1937. “Descartes et la Technique.” In Travaux du IXe congrès international de philosophie. Congrès Descartes, t. II, Études cartésiennes, IIe partie, edited by R. Bayer. Paris: Herman; Reprinted in Canguilhem 2011, 490–498.Google Scholar
  7. ———. (1943) 1989. The Normal and the Pathological. Translated by C. R. Fawcett. Brooklyn: Zone Books; (1943) 1966. Le normal et le pathologique. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  8. ——. 1943–1944. Course Notes, “L’erreur.” Fonds Georges Canguilhem, Centre d’Archives de Philosophie, d’Histoire et d’Édition des Sciences—UMS 2267.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 1955–1956. Course Notes, “La Science et l’Erreur.” Fonds Georges Canguilhem, Centre d’Archives de Philosophie, d’Histoire et d’Édition des Sciences—UMS 2267.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 1966. “L’Objet de l’Histoire des Sciences.” In Canguilhem (1968) 2002. Études d’histoire et de philosophies des sciences. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2011. Oeuvres Complètes, Tome 1. Edited by J.-F. Braunstein and Y. Schwartz. Paris: Vrin. Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2015. Oeuvres Complètes, Tome 4. Edited by C. Limoges. Paris: Vrin. Google Scholar
  13. Canguilhem, Georges, and Camille Planet. 1939. Traité de logique et de morale. Toulouse: Librairie Trentin; Reprinted in Canguilhem 2011, 633–924.Google Scholar
  14. Canguilhem, Georges, et al. 1965. “Philosophie et vérité.” Revue de l’enseignement philosophique 15 (4), avril-mai: 11–21; Reprinted in Canguilhem 2015, 1121–1140; English Translation in Tho and Bianco, eds. 2013. Badiou and the Philosophers: Interrogating 1960s French Philosophy. London: Bloomsbury, 79–98.Google Scholar
  15. Descartes, René. 1991. Discours de la méthode: suivi de La dioptrique. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2008. Meditations on First Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lalande, André, dir. (1926) 1996. Vocabulaire technique et critique de la philosophie. 18ème édition. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  18. Mol, Annemarie. 2006. The Body Multiple: An Essay in Medical Ontology. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Roth, Xavier. 2011. “Présentation.” In Canguilhem 2011, 597–626.Google Scholar
  20. Schmidgen, Hennig. 2008. “Georges Canguilhem et « les discours allemands ».” In Philosophie et médecine: en homage à Georges Canguilhem, edited by H.-J. Han and directed by A. Fagot-Largeault, C. DeBru, and M. Morange. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  21. Talcott, Samuel. 2014. “Errant Life, Molecular Biology, and the Conceptualization of Biopower: Georges Canguilhem, François Jacob, and Michel Foucault.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 36 (2): 254–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of HumanitiesUniversity of the SciencesPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations