Skip to main content

Canadian Soil Law

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Yearbook of Soil Law and Policy 2018

Part of the book series: International Yearbook of Soil Law and Policy ((IYSLP,volume 2018))

  • 390 Accesses

Abstract

Unlike many countries, Canada does not have a national soil policy. Rather, a patchwork of incentives, nonbinding guidelines, and mandatory regulations contribute to soil law in Canada. Constitutional mandates related to jurisdiction have resulted in all levels of government having some authority over soils. After providing the historical context for the emergence of soil law in Canada, this chapter provides an overview of soil policies in the areas of sustainable development, agriculture, forestry, and contaminated sites. As will be made clear, nonbinding guidelines and incentives have been the preferred tool of governments in the agricultural sector, while binding regulations are commonly employed in the forestry sector and to address contaminated sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The terms policy and regulation are generally used interchangeably throughout this text to describe government initiatives that have an impact on soils. Governments have a range of tools they can use to motivate specific action including nonbinding incentives and guidelines and binding regulations.

  2. 2.

    1994-55 Conservation Committee (1956), p. 2.

  3. 3.

    Due to the limited amount of soil in the Canadian territories and that much of it exists in the permafrost and has rarely attracted specific government attention, territorial regulation of soils is not discussed in this paper.

  4. 4.

    Constitution Act, 1867, s92(13).

  5. 5.

    Constitution Act, 1867, s92(16).

  6. 6.

    Constitution Act, 1867,s92A.

  7. 7.

    Constitution Act, 1867, s91(12).

  8. 8.

    Constitution Act, 1867, s91(10).

  9. 9.

    Interprovincial Co-operatives Ltd. et al v R (1976).

  10. 10.

    R. v. Crown Zellerbach (1988).

  11. 11.

    Constitution Act, 1867, s95.

  12. 12.

    For a comprehensive overview of early explorers and soil surveying in Canada, see generally Gray (1967).

  13. 13.

    McKeague and Stobbe (1978), p. 6.

  14. 14.

    McKeague and Stobbe (1978), pp. 7–10.

  15. 15.

    McKeague and Stobbe (1978), p. 12. More information about the importance of role of the Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Act played in the regulation of Canadian soils is found in Sect. 5.2 Erosion.

  16. 16.

    McKeague and Stobbe (1978), p. 21.

  17. 17.

    McKeague and Stobbe (1978), p. 14.

  18. 18.

    McKeague and Stobbe (1978), p. 17.

  19. 19.

    McKeague and Stobbe (1978), p. 22.

  20. 20.

    Canadian Soil Information Service (2017).

  21. 21.

    Environment and Climate Change Canada (2016).

  22. 22.

    Environment and Climate Change Canada (2016), p. 60.

  23. 23.

    Environment and Climate Change Canada (2016), pp. 19, 83, 84.

  24. 24.

    AAFC (2015).

  25. 25.

    AAFC (2016).

  26. 26.

    Soil organic carbon has actually declined in eastern Canada as the percentage of cultivated acres of annual crops has increased.

  27. 27.

    Statistics Canada (2016).

  28. 28.

    The earliest policies targeting soil erosion typically referred to the problem as ‘soil drift’.

  29. 29.

    The PFRA became the name used for the federal government agency that was established in 1937 to implement The Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Administration Act.

  30. 30.

    Marchildon (2009), p. 289.

  31. 31.

    Gray (1967), p. 99.

  32. 32.

    Gray (1967), p. 99.

  33. 33.

    Gray (1967), p. 100.

  34. 34.

    Gray (1967), p. 121.

  35. 35.

    Marchildon (2009), p. 293.

  36. 36.

    Marchildon (2009), p. 294.

  37. 37.

    Birnie (2013).

  38. 38.

    Wilson (2012).

  39. 39.

    Canada subsequently rejoined the UN Convention after a change in federal government.

  40. 40.

    Briere (2012).

  41. 41.

    AAFC (2014).

  42. 42.

    Herriot (2013).

  43. 43.

    CBC News online (2017).

  44. 44.

    Worster (1992), p. 49.

  45. 45.

    The Municipalities Act, s4(2)(d).

  46. 46.

    The Soil Conservation Act, s3.

  47. 47.

    Government of Prince Edward Island (2017).

  48. 48.

    Dorff and Beaulieu (2014), p. 4.

  49. 49.

    Dorff and Beaulieu (2014), p. 5.

  50. 50.

    Fertilizer Act, s5.2(1).

  51. 51.

    Fertilizer Act, s3.1.

  52. 52.

    Fertilizer Act, s3(c).

  53. 53.

    Agricultural Waste Control Regulation, s3.

  54. 54.

    Agricultural Waste Control Regulation, s11.

  55. 55.

    Alberta Agriculture and Forestry (2015).

  56. 56.

    CFIA (2014).

  57. 57.

    Plant Protection Regulations, s43.

  58. 58.

    Climate Change and Emissions Management Act; Jones (2017) Ontario signs agreement to join Quebec-California carbon market in 2018. The Globe and Mail. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/industry-news/energy-and-resources/ontario-signs-agreement-to-join-quebec-california-carbon-market-in-2018/article36368063/. Accessed 21 Feb 2018.

  59. 59.

    Carbon Competitiveness Incentive Regulation, s16.

  60. 60.

    Alberta Government (2017).

  61. 61.

    CCFM (2008), p. 5.

  62. 62.

    CCFM (2006).

  63. 63.

    CCFM (2006), p. 6.

  64. 64.

    CCFM (2006), p. 6.

  65. 65.

    The Forest Resource Management Regulations, s8.

  66. 66.

    Saskatchewan Environment (2007), p. 43.

  67. 67.

    Saskatchewan Environment (2007), p. 51.

  68. 68.

    CCME (2006), pp. 1–2.

  69. 69.

    The Protocol was updated in 2006.

  70. 70.

    CCME (2006), p. 2.

  71. 71.

    CCME (1998).

  72. 72.

    CCME (2001).

  73. 73.

    CCME (2001), p. 2.

  74. 74.

    CCME (2001), p. 4.

  75. 75.

    CCME (2014), p. 9.

  76. 76.

    Orland (2018).

  77. 77.

    Oil Sands Conservation Act, s1(l)(i).

  78. 78.

    Oil Sands Conservation Act, ss10, 11.

  79. 79.

    Oil Sands Environmental Monitoring Program Regulation.

  80. 80.

    Oil and Gas Conservation Rules, s12.140(1).

References

Documents

Regulation

Jurisprudence

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia L. Farnese .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Farnese, P.L. (2019). Canadian Soil Law. In: Ginzky, H., Dooley, E., Heuser, I., Kasimbazi, E., Markus, T., Qin, T. (eds) International Yearbook of Soil Law and Policy 2018. International Yearbook of Soil Law and Policy, vol 2018. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00758-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00758-4_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00757-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00758-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics