Needs of Support for Swedish Property Owners to Implement More Energy-Efficiency Improvements During Renovations

  • Åsa WahlströmEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Energy book series (SPE)


It is a well-known fact that the built environment in Europe is responsible for approximately 40% of the overall energy end usage and that this has to be reduced drastically for the building stock to be sustainable in the long term. A prerequisite to meet the EU 2020 and 2030 targets is significantly increased ambition among property owners regarding energy-efficient renovation. However, it is not easy to regulate that large-scale energy-efficiency measures should be included in the ordinary renovation of buildings. In order to design the right policy instruments to influence property owners towards energy-efficiency-oriented renovation, deeper knowledge is needed on how property owners act and argue today. This study reviews several recently performed studies with the aim of obtaining an overview of how the decision-making process is conducted, and it makes comparisons between different categories of buildings. The aim is to allow conclusions to be drawn on whether a financial incentive is important to bringing about energy-efficiency renovation and, if so, how such an incentive should be formulated. The study shows that direct and simple subsidies are needed to bring about major energy-efficiency improvements in housing in connection with renovations, especially when it comes to additional insulation for facades. For non-residential property, there is little need for financial support, while other forms of support are needed. Current energy-efficiency improvements in connection with renovations are modest and a long way off the technical potential.


Energy-efficiency Buildings Incentives Control means Subsidy 



Bengt Nyman and Rolf Westerlund, secretaries of the governmental assignment “Investigation about energy-saving loan (N 2016:02)” are acknowledged.


  1. 1.
    European Commission, Energy-Efficient Buildings PPP, Multi-Annual Roadmap and Longer Term Strategy; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, of 19 May 2010, on the energy performance of buildings (recast). Official Journal, L 153 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    The National Bord of Housing Building and Planning, Teknisk status i den svenska bebyggelsen – resultat från projektet BETSI, Boverket (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Swedish Energy Agency, Energiläget i siffror (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. Nyman, R. Westerlund, Government public investigation: Energisparlån – ett incitament för energieffektivisering? Rapport från Utredningen om energisparlån, N 2016:02 (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Å. Wahlström, A. Persson, K. Glader, K. Westerbjörk, A. Göransson, Energieffektivisering vid renovering av flerbostadshus, skolor och kontor - En intervjustudie och analys i HEFTIG, Rapport till Energimyndigheten (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Thuvander, P. Femenías, M. Xygkogianni, B. Brunklaus, Renoveringsbarometern: Omfattning och karaktär av renoveringar i bostadshus, Bygg och Teknik nr 2 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. Thuvander, P. Femenías, K. Mjörnel, P. Meiling, Unveiling the process of sustainable renovation. Sustainability 4, 1188–1213 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Femenías, L. Thuvander, K. Mjörnell, A.-L. Lane, Koll på hållbar renovering, Bygg & teknik Nr 2 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Energy Renovations of Non-residential Buildings in Northern European Countries—National non-technical barriers and methods to overcome them, Report of IEE project Total Concept, (2014)
  11. 11.
    M.-L. Maripuu, P. Wennerhag, Å. Wahlström, P. Pasanen, T. Bruce, P. Krawczyk, A. Afshari, Totalmetodikens marknadspotential och affärsmöjligheter, projektrapport (2016)
  12. 12.
    Å. Wahlström, B. Berggren, J. Florell, R. Nygren, T. Sundén, Decision making process for constructing low-energy buildings in the public housing sector in Sweden. Sustainability 8(10), 1072 (2016). Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Hastig, S. Tapper Jansson, Val av energieffektiviserande åtgärder - En studie av fastighetsägarnas investeringsbedömning vid renovering, examensarbete Lunds Tekniska Högskola, ISSN 1651-0100 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Å. Wahlström, P. Filipsson, C. Heincke, in Cost Optimal Energy Efficiency in Multifamily Houses, Proceeding of the Sixth Nordic conference on Passive Houses, Göteborg, Sweden, Passivhus Norden, 15–17 Oct 2013Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Å. Wahlström, E. Abel, M.-L. Maripuu, in Total Concept-for Better Decision-Making About Energy Efficiency Investments in Non-residential Buildings, Proceeding of ECEEE Summer Study 2015, Toulon, France, paper 6-103-15, p. 1239, 1–6 June 2015Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. Högdal, Halvera Mera Slutrapport, BeBo-rapport, (2013)
  17. 17.
    F. Bonakdar, A. Sasic Kalagasidis, in An Optimum Renovation Strategy for Swedish Single-Family House Envelopes: The Implications of Climate Zones and the Age of the Houses, Proceeding of ECEEE Summer Study, Toulon, France, paper 5-165, 29 May–3 June 2017Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Å. Wahlström, T. Berggren, T. Rydstedt, in Technical Procurement of Heat Recovery Systems in Existing Apartment Blocks in Sweden, Proceeding of ECEEE Summer Study, Toulon, France, paper 5-104, p. 1165–1172, 3–8 June 2013Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. Lind, K. Annadotter, P. Björk, P. Högberg, T. Af Klintberg, Sustainable renovation strategy in the Swedish million homes programme: a case study. Sustainability 8, 388 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Å. Wahlström, M.-L. Maripuu, A. Afshari, in Market Potential and Business Opportunities for Mayor Renovation of Non-residential Buildings with the Use of the Belok Total Concept Method in Nordic Countries, Proceedings of the 12th REHVA World Congress, Clima 2016, paper 460, Aalborg Denmark, 22–26 May 2016Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    National Board of Housing Building and Planning, REN 1, Boverkets föreskrifter om stöd för renovering och energieffektivisering i vissa bostadsområden; BFS 2016:8 (2016)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
    Notice 2012/C 115/01, Guidelines for a comparative methodology framework for calculating cost-optimal levels of minimum energy performance requirements for buildings and building elements, accompanying Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 244 (2012)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Totalmetodiken konsultrapportmall Etapp 1, (2016)
  28. 28.
    Rapportmall Halvera mera 3, (2016)

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Building ServicesLund UniversityLundSweden
  2. 2.CIT Energy ManagementGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations