An Origin-Destination Based Parking Pricing Policy for Improving Equity in Urban Transportation

Part of the AIRO Springer Series book series (AIROSS, volume 1)


In this paper we propose to optimise parking pricing fares in urban areas with the aim to improve transportation equity; the optimisation approach is applied to an origin-destination parking pricing policy that can differentiate the tariffs for each origin-destination pair, considering the difference in accessibility, in particular with public transport services. An optimisation model is implemented, and a solution algorithm is proposed. Model and algorithm are tested on the case study of Naples (Italy), where the quality of transit services is very different between zones and OD pairs; therefore, differentiating parking fares as a function of origin and destination of the trip may be very useful for rebalancing accessibilities among zones, aiming to improve transportation equity.


Transportation Parking pricing Equity Optimisation Accessibility 


  1. 1.
    Verhoef, E.T.: Second-best congestion pricing in general networks. Heuristic algorithms for finding second-best optimal toll levels and toll points. Transp. Res. B 36, 707–729 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Palmer, D., Ferris, C.: Parking measures and policies research review. Transport Research Laboratory—TRL. Project Record PPRO 4/45/4 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Inci, E.: A review of the economics of parking. Econ. Transp. 4, 501–563 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jansson, J.O.: Road pricing and parking policy. Res. Transp. Econ. 29, 346–353 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D’Acierno, L., Gallo, M., Montella, B.: Optimisation models for the urban parking pricing problem. Transp. Policy 13, 34–48 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gallo, M.: Improving equity of urban transit systems with the adoption of origin-destination based taxi fares. Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci. (2018) (in press)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jones, P., Lucas, K.: The social consequence of transport decision-making: clarifying concepts, synthesising knowledge and assessing implications. J. Transp. Geogr. 21, 4–16 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Caggiani, L., Camporeale, R., Ottomanelli, M.: Facing equity in transportation network design problem: a flexible constraints based model. Transp. Policy 55, 9–17 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cascetta, E.: Transportation systems analysis: models and applications. Springer, New York, USA (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ben-Akiva, M., Lerman, S.: Discrete Choice Analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge, USA (1985)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cascetta, E.: Modelli per i sistemi di trasporto. Teoria e applicazioni, UTET, Torino, Italy (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ISTAT I dati del censimento (2011).

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di IngegneriaUniversità del SannioBeneventoItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Edile e AmbientaleUniversità di Napoli Federico IINaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations