Advertisement

Vasectomy Reversal: The First Steps

  • Sheldon H. F. Marks
Chapter

Abstract

Performing a correctly performed microsurgical vasectomy reversal is so much more than throwing a few microsutures. There are a number of preparations the surgeon should take as well as key concepts before and during the reversal to ensure that the patient receives the very best care and surgical outcomes. It is important to understand crucial principals about preserving the tissues, locating the vasal defect, confirming abdominal patency, and transecting the vas. Analysis of the vasal fluid, both gross and microscopic, guides the intraoperative decision-making as to whether to perform a vasovasostomy or vasoepididymostomy. Challenges often occur with indeterminate vasal fluid with concerns about cross contamination. Sperm banking during the reversal is an option to be discussed preoperatively with the patient.

Keywords

Prophylactic antibiotics Pre-reversal examination Scrotal incisions Vasectomy site Transseptal vasovasostomy Transecting the vas Abdominal patency Gross and microscopic vasal fluid analysis Intraoperative decision-making Indeterminate vasal fluid Cross contamination Sperm banking 

References

  1. 1.
    American Urological Association; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Antibiotic prophylaxis for urological patients with total joint replacements. J Urol. 2003;169:1796–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wolf JS Jr, Bennett CJ, Dmochowski RR, Hollenbeck BK, Pearle MS, Schaeffer AJ. Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol. 2008;179(4):1379–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lowe G. Optimizing outcomes in vasectomy: how to ensure sterility and prevent complications. Transl Androl Urol. 2016;5(2):176–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jarvi K, Grober ED, Lo KC, Patry G. Mini-incision microsurgical vasectomy reversal using no-scalpel vasectomy principles and instruments. Urology. 2008;72:913–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grober ED, Jarvi K, Lo KC, Shin EJ. Mini-incision vasectomy reversal using no-scalpel vasectomy principles: efficacy and postoperative pain compared with traditional approaches to vasectomy reversal. Urology. 2011;77:602–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Werthman P. Mini-incision microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: a new surgical approach. Urology. 2007;70:794–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schulster ML, Cohn MR, Najari BB, Goldstein M. Microsurgically assisted inguinal hernia repair and simultaneous male fertility procedures: rationale, technique and outcomes. J Urol. 2017;198(5):1168–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schulster ML, Cohn MR, Najari BB, Goldstein M. Microsurgically assisted inguinal hernia repair and simultaneous male fertility procedures: rationale, technique and outcomes. J Urol. 2017;198(5):1168–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nagler HM, Belletete BA, Gerber E, Dinlenc CZ. Laparoscopic retrieval of retroperitoneal vas deferens in vasovasostomy for postinguinal herniorrhaphy obstructive azoospermia. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shaeer OK, Shaeer KZ. Pelviscrotal vasovasostomy: refining and troubleshooting. J Urol. 2005;174:1935–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lizza EF, Marmar JL, Schmidt SS, Lanasa JA Jr, Sharlip ID, Thomas AJ, Belker AM, Nagler HM. Transseptal crossed vasovasostomy. J Urol. 1985;134:1131–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sabanegh E, Thomas AJ. Effectiveness of crossover transseptal vasoepididymostomy in treating complex obstructive azoospermia. Fertil Steril. 1995;63(2):392–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crosnoe LE, Kim ED, Perkins AR, Marks MB, Burrows PJ, Marks SH. Angled vas cutter for vasovasostomy: technique and results. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(3):636–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Patel SR, Sigman M. Comparison of outcomes of vasovasostomy performed in the convoluted and straight vas deferens. J Urol. 2008;179:256–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sandlow JI, Kolettis PN. Vasovasostomy in the convoluted vas deferens: indications and outcomes. J Urol. 2005;173:540–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ostrowski KA, Tadros NN, Polackwich AS, McClure RD, Fuchs EF, Hedges JC. Factors and practice patterns that affect the decision for vasoepididymostomy. Can J Urol. 2017;24(1):8651–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Elzanaty S, Dohle GR. Vasovasostomy and predictors of vasal patency: a systematic review. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2012;46:241–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hinz S, Rais-Bahrami S, Weiske WH, Kempkensteffen C, Schrader M, Miller K, et al. Prognostic value of intraoperative parameters observed during vasectomy reversal for predicting postoperative vas patency and fertility. World J Urol. 2009;27(6):781–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kirby EW, Hockenberry M, Lipshultz LI. Vasectomy reversal: decision making and technical innovations. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6(4):753–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kolettis PN, Burns JR, Nangia AK, Sandlow JI. Outcomes for vasovasostomy performed when only sperm parts are present in the vasal fluid. J Androl. 2006;27:565–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kolettis PN, D'Amico AM, Box L, et al. Outcomes for vasovasostomy with bilateral intravasal azoospermia. J Androl. 2003;24:22–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jarow JP, Sigman M, Buch JP, Oates RD. Delayed appearance of sperm after end-to-side vasoepididymostomy. J Urol. 1995;153:1156–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ramasamy R, Mata DA, Jain L, Perkins AR, Marks SH, Lipshultz LI. Microscopic visualization of intravasal spermatozoa is positively associated with patency after bilateral microsurgical vasovasostomy. Andrology. 2015;3(3):532–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Scovell JM, Mata DA, Ramasamy R, Herrel LA, Hsiao W, Lipshultz LI. Association between the presence of sperm in the vasal fluid during vasectomy reversal and postoperative patency: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urology. 2015;85(4):809–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sheynkin YR, Chen ME, Goldstein M. Intravasal azoospermia: a surgical dilemma. BJU Int. 2000;85:1089–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shin YS, Sang KSD, Park JK. Preoperative factors influencing postoperative results after vasovasostomy. World J Mens Health. 2012;30(3):177–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sigman M. The relationship between intravasal sperm quality and patency rates after vasovasostomy. J Urol. 2004;171:307–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Smith RP, Khanna A, Kovac JR, et al. The significance of sperm heads and tails within the vasal fluid during vasectomy reversal. Indian J Urol. 2014;30:164–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Belker AM, Thomas AJ Jr, Fuchs EF, Konnak JW, Sharlip ID. Results of 1,469 microsurgical vasectomy reversals by the Vasovasostomy study group. J Urol. 1991;145:505–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Silber SJ. Microscopic vasectomy reversal. Fertil Steril. 1977;28:1191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Glazier DB, Marmar JL, Mayer E, Gibbs M, Corson SL. The fate of cryopreserved sperm acquired during vasectomy reversals. J Urol. 1999;161:463–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Boyle KE, Thomas AJ Jr, Marmar JL, Hirshberg S, Belker AM, Jarow JP. Sperm harvesting and cryopreservation during vasectomy reversal is not cost effective. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:961–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schrepferman CG, Carson MR, Sparks AE, Sandlow JI. Need for sperm retrieval and cryopreservation at vasectomy reversal. J Urol. 2001;166:1787–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chan PT. The evolution and refinement of vasoepididymostomy techniques. Asian J Androl. 2013;15:49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Peng J, Yuan Y, Zhang Z, Gao B, Song W, et al. Patency rates of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy for patients with idiopathic obstructive azoospermia: a prospective analysis of factors associated with patency – single-center experience. Urology. 2012;79:119–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Baker K, Sabanegh E. Obstructive azoospermia: reconstructive techniques and results. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013;68(Suppl 1):61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chan PT, Brandell RA, Goldstein M. Prospective analysis of outcomes after microsurgical intussusception vasoepididymostomy. BJU Int. 2005;96:598–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pavlovich CP, Schlegel PN. Fertility options after vasectomy: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Fertil Steril. 1997;67(1):133–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Shridharani A, Sandlow JI. Vasectomy reversal versus IVF with sperm retrieval: which is better? Curr Opin Urol. 2010;20:503–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sheldon H. F. Marks
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Arizona College of MedicineInternational Center Vasectomy ReversalTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations