Skip to main content

Polysaccharides-Based Hybrids with Graphene

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Polysaccharide Based Hybrid Materials

Abstract

Graphene is a single layer of carbon atoms covalently bonded in a hexagonal crystalline structure, isolated for the first time by Geim and Novoselov from the University of Manchester (UK) [1]. Graphene is a flat-like single layer of hybridized sp2 carbon atoms, which are densely packed onto each other into an ordered 2D honeycomb network (Fig. 4.1a), described by IUPAC as a single carbon layer of the graphite structure, describing its nature by analogy to a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon of quasi infinite size [2]. A unit hexagonal cell of graphene comprises two equivalent sub-lattices of carbon atoms, joined together by sigma (σ) bonds with a carbon-carbon bond length of 0.142 nm [3]. Each carbon atom in the lattice has a π-orbital that contributes to a delocalized network of electrons, making graphene sufficiently stable compared to other nanosystems and providing graphene with unique properties [4]. The applicability of graphene is based on the advantageous carbon network which provides this material with a combination of a large specific surface area, superior mechanical stiffness and flexibility, remarkable optical transmittance, high electronic and thermal conductivities, permeability to gases, as well as many other supreme properties [4].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Raimond JM, Brune M, Computation Q, De Martini F, Monroe C, Moehring DL, Knight PL, Plenio MB, Vedral V, Polzik ES, Variables C, Braunstein SL, Pati AK, Lukin MD, Cirac IJ, Zoller P, Han C, Xue P, Guo GC, Polyakov SV, Kuzmich A, Kimble HJ, Cirac JI, Kennedy TAB, Horodecki P, Horodecki R, Divincenzo DP, Smolin JA, Beige A, Kwek LC, Kok P, Sauer JA, You L, Zangwill A, Chapman MS, Nielsen M. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science. 2004;20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  2. International union of pure and applied chemistry. Recommended Terminol. 1995;67:473–506

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bianco A, Cheng HM, Enoki T, Gogotsi Y, Hurt RH, Koratkar N, Kyotani T, Monthioux M, Park CR, Tascon JMD, Zhang J. All in the graphene family—a recommended nomenclature for two-dimensional carbon materials. Carbon. 2013;65:1–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhu Y, Murali S, Cai W, Li X, Suk JW, Potts JR, Ruoff RS. Graphene and graphene oxide: synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv Mater. 2010;22:3906–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gonçalves G, Marques PAAP, Barros-Timmons A, Bdkin I, Singh MK, Emami N, Grácio J. Graphene oxide modified with PMMA via ATRP as a reinforcement filler. J Mater Chem. 2010;20:9927.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Marques PAAP, Gonçalves G, Cruz S, Almeida N, Singh MK, Grácio J, Sousa AACM. Functionalized graphene nanocomposites. In: Hashim AA, editors. Advances in nanocomposite technology, IntechOpen; 2011. p. 247–72.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dreyer DR, Park S, Bielawsk CW, Ruoff RS. The chemistry of graphene oxide. Chem Soc Rev. 2010;39:228–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Acik M, Lee G, Mattevi C, Chhowalla M, Cho K, Chabal YJ. Unusual infrared-absorption mechanism in thermally reduced graphene oxide. Nat Mater. 2010;9:840–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ege D, Kamali AR, Boccaccini AR. Graphene oxide/polymer-based biomaterials. Adv Eng Mater. 2017;19:16–34.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Feng H, Cheng R, Zhao X, Duan X, Li J. A low-temperature method to produce highly reduced graphene oxide. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1537–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wick P, Louw-Gaume AE, Kucki M, Krug HF, Kostarelos K, Fadeel B, Dawson KA, Salvati A, Vázquez E, Ballerini L, Tretiach M, Benfenati F, Flahaut E, Gauthier L, Prato M, Bianco A. Classification framework for graphene-based materials. Angew Chemie Int Ed. 2014;53:7714–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Papageorgiou DG, Kinloch IA, Young RJ. Mechanical properties of graphene and graphene-based nanocomposites. Prog Mater Sci. 2017;90:75–127.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Li A, Zhang C, Zhang YF. Thermal conductivity of graphene-polymer composites: mechanisms, properties, and applications. Polymers. 2017;9:1–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Atif R, Shyha I, Inam F. Mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties of graphene-epoxy nanocomposites—a review. Polymers. 2016;8:281.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Terzopoulou Z, Kyzas GZ, Bikiaris DN. Recent advances in nanocomposite materials of graphene derivatives with polysaccharides. Materials. 2015;8:652–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Włodarczyk D, Urban M, Strankowski M. Chemical modifications of graphene and their influence on properties of polyurethane composites: a review. Phys Scr. 2016;91:104003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang M, Duan X, Xu Y, Duan X. Functional three-dimensional graphene/polymer composites. ACS Nano. 2016;10:7231–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wasupalli GK, Verma D. Polysaccharides as biomaterials. In: Thomas S, Balakrishnan P, Sreekala MS, editors. Fundamental biomaterials: polymers. Woodhead Publishing; 2018. p. 37–70.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reina G, González-Domínguez JM, Criado A, Vázquez E, Bianco A, Prato M. Promises, facts and challenges for graphene in biomedical applications, Chem Soc Rev. 2017;4400–4416

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ramani D, Sastry TP. Bacterial cellulose-reinforced hydroxyapatite functionalized graphene oxide: a potential osteoinductive composite. Cellulose. 2014;21:3585–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ciolacu DE, Suflet DM. Cellulose-based hydrogels for medical/pharmaceutical applications. In: Popa V, Volf I, editors. Biomass as renewable raw material to obtain bioproducts of high-tech value. Elsevier; 2018 p. 401–39.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Derivatives PP, Puiggal J. Hydrogels for biomedical applications: cellulose, chitosan, and protein/peptide derivatives. Gels. 2017;3:27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yu P, Bao R, Shi X, Yang W, Yang M. Self-assembled high-strength hydroxyapatite/ graphene oxide/chitosan composite hydrogel for bone tissue engineering. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;155:507–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stagnaro P, Schizzi I, Utzeri R, Marsano E, Castellano M. Alginate-polymethacrylate hybrid hydrogels for potential osteochondral tissue regeneration. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;185:56–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mohan N, Mohanan PV, Sabareeswaran A, Nair P. Chitosan-hyaluronic acid hydrogel for cartilage repair. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017;104:1936–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee KJ, Il Yun S. Nanocomposite hydrogels based on agarose and diphenylalanine, Polymer. 2018;67:86–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Vedadghavami A, Minooei F, Mohammadi MH, Khetani S, Rezaei Kolahchi A, Mashayekhan S, Sanati-Nezhad A. Manufacturing of hydrogel biomaterials with controlled mechanical properties for tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater. 2017;62:42–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mohd N, Draman SFS, Salleh MSN, Yusof NB. Dissolution of cellulose in ionic liquid: a review. AIP Conf Proc. 2017;1809:020035.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Swatloski RP, Spear SK, Holbrey JD, Rogers RD. Dissolution of cellulose with ionic liquids. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:4974–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Xu M, Huang Q, Wang X, Sun R. Highly tough cellulose/graphene composite hydrogels prepared from ionic liquids. Ind Crop Prod. 2015;70:56–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fan L, Yi J, Tong J, Zhou X, Ge H, Zou S, Wen H, Nie M. Preparation and characterization of oxidized konjac glucomannan/carboxymethyl chitosan/graphene oxide hydrogel. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016;91:358–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Shao W, Liu H, Liu X, Wang S, Zhang R. Anti-bacterial performances and biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose/graphene oxide composites. RSC Adv. 2015;5:4795–803.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Nandgaonkar AG, Wang Q, Fu K, Krause WE, Wei Q, Gorga R, Lucia LA. A one-pot biosynthesis of reduced graphene oxide (RGO)/bacterial cellulose (BC) nanocomposites. Green Chem. 2014;16:3195–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mura S, Nicolas J, Couvreur P. Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug delivery. Nat Mater. 2013;12:991–1003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Deng L, Li Q, Al-Rehili S, Omar H, Almalik A, Alshamsan A, Zhang J, Khashab NM. Hybrid iron oxide-graphene oxide-polysaccharides microcapsule: a micro-matryoshka for on-demand drug release and antitumor therapy in vivo. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8:6859–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Luo H, Ao H, Li G, Li W, Xiong G, Zhu Y, Wan Y. Bacterial cellulose/graphene oxide nanocomposite as a novel drug delivery system. Curr Appl Phys. 2017;17:249–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang C, Wu C, Zhou X, Han T, Xin X, Wu J, Zhang J, Guo S. Enhancing cell nucleus accumulation and dna cleavage activity of anti-cancer drug via graphene quantum dots. Sci. Rep. 2013;3:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Schroeder KL, Goreham RV, Nann T. Graphene quantum dots for theranostics and bioimaging. Pharm Res. 2016;33:2337–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Javanbakht S, Namazi H. Doxorubicin loaded carboxymethyl cellulose/graphene quantum dot nanocomposite hydrogel films as a potential anticancer drug delivery system. Mater Sci Eng, C. 2018;87:50–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Justin R, Román S, Chen D, Tao K, Geng X, Grant RT, MacNeil S, Sun K, Chen B. Biodegradable and conductive chitosan–graphene quantum dot nanocomposite microneedles for delivery of both small and large molecular weight therapeutics. RSC Adv. 2015;5:51934–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Aggarwal P, Johnston CR. Geometrical effects in mechanical characterizing of microneedle for biomedical applications. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2004;102:226–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Olszowska K, Pang J, Wrobel PS, Zhao L, Ta HQ, Liu Z, Trzebicka B, Bachmatiuk A, Rummeli MH. Three-dimensional nanostructured graphene: synthesis and energy, environmental and biomedical applications. Synth Met. 2017;234:53–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Henriques B, Gonçalves G, Emami N, Pereira E, Vila M, Marques PAAP. Optimized graphene oxide foam with enhanced performance and high selectivity for mercury removal from water. J Hazard Mater. 2016;301:453–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mahfoudhi N, Boufi S. Nanocellulose as a novel nanostructured adsorbent for environmental remediation: a review. Cellulose. 2017;24:1171–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Crini G. Recent developments in polysaccharide-based materials used as adsorbents in wastewater treatment. Prog Polym Sci. 2005;30:38–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Brion-Roby R, Gagnon J, Deschênes JS, Chabot B. Development and treatment procedure of arsenic-contaminated water using a new and green chitosan sorbent: Kinetic, isotherm, thermodynamic and dynamic studies. Pure Appl Chem. 2018;90:63–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Bertoni FA, González JC, García SI, Sala LF, Bellú SE. Application of chitosan in removal of molybdate ions from contaminated water and groundwater. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;180:55–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Shen Y, Zhu X, Chen B. Size effects of graphene oxide nanosheets on the construction of three-dimensional graphene-based macrostructures as adsorbents. J Mater Chem A. 2016;4:12106–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Xiao J, Lv W, Song Y, Zheng Q. Graphene/nanofiber aerogels: performance regulation towards multiple applications in dye adsorption and oil/water separation. Chem Eng J. 2018;338:202–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Mi HY, Jing X, Politowicz AL, Chen E, Huang HX, Turng LS. Highly compressible ultra-light anisotropic cellulose/graphene aerogel fabricated by bidirectional freeze drying for selective oil absorption. Carbon. 2018;132:199–209.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Wei X, Huang T, Hui Yang J, Zhang N, Wang Y, Wan Zhou Z. Green synthesis of hybrid graphene oxide/microcrystalline cellulose aerogels and their use as superabsorbents. J Hazard Mater. (2017);335:28–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Yao Q, Fan B, Xiong Y, Jin C, Sun Q, Sheng C. 3D assembly based on 2D structure of cellulose nanofibril/graphene oxide hybrid aerogel for adsorptive removal of antibiotics in water. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Sitko R, Musielak M, Zawisza B, Talik E, Gagor A. Graphene oxide/cellulose membranes in adsorption of divalent metal ions. RSC Adv. 2016;6:96595–605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Xu L, Wang J. The application of graphene-based materials for the removal of heavy metals and radionuclides from water and wastewater. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2017;47:1042–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Chen X, Zhou S, Zhang L, You T, Xu F. Adsorption of heavy metals by graphene oxide/cellulose hydrogel prepared from NaOH/urea aqueous solution. Materials. 2016;9:582.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Khulbe KC, Matsuura T. Removal of heavy metals and pollutants by membrane adsorption techniques. Appl Water Sci. 2018;8:19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Kyzas GZ, Travlou NA, Deliyanni EA. The role of chitosan as nanofiller of graphite oxide for the removal of toxic mercury ions. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces. 2014;113:467–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Debnath S, Maity A, Pillay K. Magnetic chitosan–GO nanocomposite: Synthesis, characterization and batch adsorber design for Cr(VI) removal. J Environ Chem Eng. 2014;2:963–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Xu C, Shi L, Guo L, Wang X, Wang X, Lian H. Fabrication and characteristics of graphene oxide/nanocellulose fiber/poly(vinyl alcohol) film. J Appl Polym Sci. 2017;134:45345.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Yan N, Capezzuto F, Lavorgna M, Buonocore GG, Tescione F, Xia H, Ambrosio L. Borate cross-linked graphene oxide-chitosan as robust and high gas barrier films. Nanoscale. 2016;8:10783–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Ionita M, Pandele MA, Iovu H. Sodium alginate/graphene oxide composite films with enhanced thermal and mechanical properties. Carbohydr Polym. 2013;94:339–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ashori A. Effects of graphene on the behavior of chitosan and starch nanocomposite films. Polym Eng Sci. 2014;54:2258–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Ahmed J, Mulla M, Arfat YA. Mechanical, thermal, structural and barrier properties of crab shell chitosan/graphene oxide composite films, Food Hydrocoll. (2017);71:141–148.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. El Achaby M, Essamlali Y, El Miri N, Snik A, Abdelouahdi K, Fihri A, Zahouily M, Solhy A. Graphene oxide reinforced chitosan/polyvinylpyrrolidone polymer bio‐nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci. 2014;131

    Google Scholar 

  65. Ma T, Chang PR, Zheng P, Ma X. The composites based on plasticized starch and graphene oxide/reduced graphene oxide. Carbohydr Polym. 2013;94:63–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Dutta S, Kim J, Ide Y, Ho Kim J, Hossain MSA, Bando Y, Yamauchi Y, Wu KC-W. 3D network of cellulose-based energy storage devices and related emerging applications. Mater. Horiz. 2017;4:522–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Wang Z, Tammela P, Strømme M, Nyholm L. Cellulose-based supercapacitors: material and performance considerations. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017;7:1700130.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Pérez-Madrigal MM, Edo MG, Aleman C. Powering the future: Application of cellulose-based materials for supercapacitors. Green Chem. 2016;18:5930–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Du X, Zhang Z, Liu W, Deng Y. Nanocellulose-based conductive materials and their emerging applications in energy devices—a review. Nano Energy. 2017;35:299–320.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Koga H, Tonomura H, Nogi M, Suganuma K, Nishina Y. Fast, scalable, and eco-friendly fabrication of an energy storage paper electrode. Green Chem. 2016;18:1117–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Zhang C, Cha R, Yang L, Mou K, Jiang X. Fabrication of cellulose/graphene paper as a stable-cycling anode materials without collector. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;184:30–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Kang Y-R, Li Y-L, Hou F, Wen Y-Y, Su D. Fabrication of electric papers of graphene nanosheet shelled cellulose fibres by dispersion and infiltration as flexible electrodes for energy storage. Nanoscale. 2012;4:3248–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Sevilla M, Ferrero GA, Fuertes AB. Graphene-cellulose tissue composites for high power supercapacitors. Energy Storage Mater. 2016;5:33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Ma L, Liu R, Liu L, Wang F, Niu H, Huang Y. Facile synthesis of Ni(OH)2/graphene/bacterial cellulose paper for large areal mass, mechanically tough and flexible supercapacitor electrodes. J Power Sources. 2016;335:76–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Lv Y, Li L, Zhou Y, Yu M, Wang J, Liu J, Zhou J. A cellulose-based hybrid 2D material aerogel for a flexible all-solid-state supercapacitor with high specific capacitance. RSC Adv. 2017;7:43512–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Liu Y, Zhou J, Zhu E, Tang J, Liu X, Tang W. Facile synthesis of bacterial cellulose fi bres covalently intercalated with graphene oxide by. J Mater Chem C Mater Opt Electron Devices. 2015;3:1011–1017

    Google Scholar 

  77. Liu Y, Zhou J, Tang J, Tang W. Three-dimensional, chemically bonded polypyrrole/bacterial cellulose/graphene composites for high-performance supercapacitors. Chem Mater. 2015;27:7034–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Gao K, Shao Z, Li J, Wang X, Peng X, Wang W, Wang F. Cellulose nanofiber–graphene all solid-state flexible supercapacitors. J Mater Chem A. 2013;1:63–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Liu R, Ma L, Huang S, Mei J, Xu J, Yuan G. Large areal mass, flexible and freestanding polyaniline/bacterial cellulose/graphene film for high-performance supercapacitors. RSC Adv. 2016;6:107426–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Luo H, Dong J, Zhang Y, Li G, Guo R, Zuo G, Ye M, Wang Z, Yang Z, Wan Y. Constructing 3D bacterial cellulose/graphene/polyaniline nanocomposites by novel layer-by-layer in situ culture toward mechanically robust and highly flexible freestanding electrodes for supercapacitors. Chem Eng J. 2018;334:1148–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Selvam S, Balamuralitharan B, Jegatheeswaran S, Kim M-Y, Karthick SN, Anandha Raj J, Boomi P, Sundrarajan M, Prabakar K, Kim H-J. Electrolyte-imprinted graphene oxide-chitosan chelate with copper crosslinked composite electrodes for intense cyclic-stable, flexible supercapacitors. J Mater Chem A. 2017;5:1380–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Andreeva TD, Stoichev S, Taneva SG, Krastev R. Hybrid graphene oxide/polysaccharide nanocomposites with controllable surface properties and biocompatibility. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;181:78–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Saravanan S, Chawla A, Vairamani M, Sastry TP, Subramanian KS, Selvamurugan N. Scaffolds containing chitosan, gelatin and graphene oxide for bone tissue regeneration in vitro and in vivo. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017;104:1975–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Serrano-Aroca Á, Iskandar L, Deb S. Green synthetic routes to alginate-graphene oxide composite hydrogels with enhanced physical properties for bioengineering applications. Eur Polym J. 2018;103:198–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Rajesh R, Ravichandran YD. Development of new graphene oxide incorporated tricomponent scaffolds with polysaccharides and hydroxyapatite and study of their osteoconductivity on MG-63 cell line for bone tissue engineering. RSC Adv. 2015;5:41135–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Pal N, Dubey P, Gopinath P, Pal K. Combined effect of cellulose nanocrystal and reduced graphene oxide into poly-lactic acid matrix nanocomposite as a scaffold and its anti-bacterial activity. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017;95:94–105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Sun H, Zhang L, Xia W, Chen L, Xu Z, Zhang W. Fabrication of graphene oxide-modified chitosan for controlled release of dexamethasone phosphate. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process. 2016;122:1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Liu X, Cheng X, Wang F, Feng L, Wang Y, Zheng Y, Guo R. Targeted delivery of SNX-2112 by polysaccharide-modified graphene oxide nanocomposites for treatment of lung cancer. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;185:85–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Li Y, Zhang H, Fan M, Zheng P, Zhuang J, Chen L. A robust salt-tolerant superoleophobic alginate/graphene oxide aerogel for efficient oil/water separation in marine environments. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Suo F, Xie G, Zhang J, Li J, Li C, Liu X, Zhang Y, Ma Y, Ji M. A carbonised sieve-like corn straw cellulose–graphene oxide composite for organophosphorus pesticide removal. RSC Adv. 2018;8:7735–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Yang A, Wu J, Huang CP. Graphene oxide-cellulose composite for the adsorption of uranium (VI) from dilute aqueous solutions. 2018;22:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  92. Yakout AA, El-Sokkary RH, Shreadah MA, Abdel OG. Hamid, Cross-linked graphene oxide sheets via modified extracted cellulose with high metal adsorption. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;172:20–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Algothmi WM, Bandaru NM, Yu Y, Shapter JG, Ellis AV. Alginate–graphene oxide hybrid gel beads: An efficient copper adsorbent material. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2013;397:32–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Huang H-D, Liu C-Y, Li D, Chen Y-H, Zhong G-J, Li Z-M. Ultra-low gas permeability and efficient reinforcement of cellulose nanocomposite films by well-aligned graphene oxide nanosheets. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2014;2:15853–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. El Achaby M, El Miri E, Snik A, Zahouily M, Abdelouahdi K, Fihri A, Barakat A, Solhy A. Mechanically strong nanocomposite films based on highly filled carboxymethyl cellulose with graphene oxide J Appl Polym Sci. 2015;133

    Google Scholar 

  96. Huang Q, Xu M, Sun R, Wang X. Large scale preparation of graphene oxide/cellulose paper with improved mechanical performance and gas barrier properties by conventional papermaking method. Ind Crops Prod. 2016;85:198–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Lee DB, Kim DW, Shchipunov Y, Ha C-S. Effects of graphene oxide on the formation, structure and properties of bionanocomposite films made from wheat gluten with chitosan. Polym Int. 2016;65:1039–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Demitri C, De Benedictis VM, Madaghiele M, Corcione CE, Maffezzoli A. Nanostructured active chitosan-based films for food packaging applications: effect of graphene stacks on mechanical properties. Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed. 2016;90:418–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Ge X, Li H, Wu L, Li P, Mu X, Jiang Y. Improved mechanical and barrier properties of starch film with reduced graphene oxide modified by SDBS. J Appl Polym Sci. 2017;134:44910.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Jose J, Al-Harthi MA. Citric acid crosslinking of poly(vinyl alcohol)/starch/graphene nanocomposites for superior properties. Iran Polym J. 2017;26:579–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Aqlil M, Moussemba Nzenguet A, Essamlali Y, Snik A, Larzek M, Zahouily M. Graphene oxide filled lignin/starch polymer bionanocomposite: structural, physical, and mechanical studies. J Agric Food Chem. 2017;65:10571–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Bher A, Unalan IU. Toughening of poly(lactic acid) and thermoplastic cassava starch reactive blends using graphene nanoplatelets. Polymers. 2018;10:1–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Nie L, Liu C, Wang J, Shuai Y, Cui X, Liu L. Effects of surface functionalized graphene oxide on the behavior of sodium alginate. Carbohydr Polym. 2015;117:616–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Zheng Q, Cai Z, Ma Z, Gong S. Cellulose nanofibril/reduced graphene oxide/carbon nanotube hybrid aerogels for highly flexible and all-solid-state supercapacitors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7:3263–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Wang Y, He Z, Wang Y, Fan C, Liu C, Peng Q, Chen J, Feng Z. Preparation and characterization of flexible lithium iron phosphate/graphene/cellulose electrode for lithium ion batteries. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2018;512:398–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Chang Y, Zhou L, Xiao Z, Liang J, Kong D, Li Z, Zhang X, Li X, Zhi L. Embedding reduced graphene oxide in bacterial cellulose-derived carbon nanofibril networks for supercapacitors. ChemElectroChem. 2017;4:2448–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Zhang Y, Wang F, Zhang D, Chen J, Zhu H, Zhou L, Chen Z. New type multifunction porous aerogels for supercapacitors and absorbents based on cellulose nanofibers and graphene. Mater Lett. 2017;208:73–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Sun G, Li B, Ran J, Shen X, Tong H. Three-dimensional hierarchical porous carbon/graphene composites derived from graphene oxide-chitosan hydrogels for high performance supercapacitors. Electrochim Acta. 2015;171:13–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Zhang Y, Zhu J-Y, Ren H-B, Bi Y-T, Zhang L. Facile synthesis of nitrogen-doped graphene aerogels functionalized with chitosan for supercapacitors with excellent electrochemical performance. Chinese Chem. Lett. 2017;28:935–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Hosseini MG, Shahryari E. A Novel High-performance supercapacitor based on chitosan/graphene oxide-mwcnt/polyaniline. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2017;496:371–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Wu W, Li Y, Yang L, Ma Y, Pan D, Li Y. A facile one-pot preparation of dialdehyde starch reduced graphene oxide/polyaniline composite for supercapacitors. Electrochim Acta. 2014;139:117–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Ma T, Chang PR, Zheng P, Zhao F, Ma X. Porous graphene gels: preparation and its electrochemical properties. Mater Chem Phys. 2014;146:446–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carmen Sofia da Rocha Freire Barros .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vilela, C., Pinto, R.J.B., Pinto, S., Marques, P., Silvestre, A., da Rocha Freire Barros, C.S. (2018). Polysaccharides-Based Hybrids with Graphene. In: Polysaccharide Based Hybrid Materials. SpringerBriefs in Molecular Science(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00347-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics